110 likes | 204 Views
Who is Controlling the Internet ?. Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange Predicts 98+ Conference Paris, 21st Apr 98. Personal view rather than organisation policy. CORE model:. 7 new gTLDs one shared registry many registrars competition between registrars.
E N D
Who is Controlling the Internet ? Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange Predicts 98+ Conference Paris, 21st Apr 98
CORE model: • 7 new gTLDs • one shared registry • many registrars • competition between registrars
US Green Paper model: • 5 new gTLDs • each a monolithic registrar + registry • competition between gTLDs • NSI keeps com/net/org monopoly initially • eventually split NSI registrar/registry roles
Issues facing CORE approach • Will open technology for shared registry database be ready in time ? • Proprietary distributed database could lead to supplier rather than registrar monopoly • Registrars have accepted pre-registrations for new gTLDs
Issues facing Green Paper approach • NSI monopoly must be dealt with by end Sep 98 • Wider Internet governance issues raised
IANA Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Responsible for: • root of TLD namespace • IP address assignments • Protocol standards and identifiers • Largely de-facto authority
Regional Number Registries • RIPE, APNIC, ARIN • Delegated authority & address space from IANA • Broad base of Internet Provider members (registrars)
RIPE NCC • Operational arm of pan -European ISP body, RIPE • Autonomous from 1st Jan 98 • Has ~900 member registrars in greater "European" area • Spinning off new RIPE CENTR project for national TLDs
Green paper on IANA governance: • US legal entity • Board appointed from "bottom up" representation • 7 out of 15 seats from name & number registries, IAB • 7 out of 15 seats from "user organisations"
Issues facing Green Paper IANA Proposals: • Who and Where exactly are the "user organisations" ? • Incorporation under Californian law • Not clear if Internet providers are represented as users or via registries • US bias under opposition from EU • Timescales