700 likes | 943 Views
Competitor Analysis (Ver. 1.02). Introduction. This document is designed as a promotional material where functional and comprehensive product performance is compared and evaluated between the e-STUDIO6550C/6540C/5540C and their competitors’ models.
E N D
Introduction • This document is designed as a promotional material where functional and comprehensive product performance is compared and evaluated between the e-STUDIO6550C/6540C/5540C and their competitors’models. • This document is created as a worldwide version. Information on Toshiba and its competitors' MFPs contains the models and options not supported in some regions. • The comparison between the e-STUDIO6550C/6540C/5540C and their competitors’ models is performed by conducting one-to-many functional evaluation and one-to-one comprehensive evaluation. • It is the CanonimageRUNNER ADVANCE C7055 that was compared with the e-STUDIO6550C in copy productivity, print performance, and image quality (copy, print, and scan) since it was the only competitor model purchased for the evaluation. • The e-STUDIO6550C/6540C/5540C are referred to as “e-STUDIO6550C series” in this document, unless otherwise specified. • The color tone and image quality of the images in this report may be different from the actual images depending on the features of the display and printer.
Table of Contents • Competitors’ Lineup of Color MFPs Canon/Ricoh /Xerox/Fuji Xerox/Konica Minolta/Sharp • Verification of Competitive Edge Dimensions & Weight (Main Unit) / Max. Paper Weight & Size / Document Feeder / Paper Handling Options / Touch Panel / Operation Panel / Template / Copier Features / Printer Features /Scanner Features / Fax Features / Box Features / Media Correspondence / Security Features / Authentication Features / Device Management (Web Utility) / Environmental Features / Web Enhanced Features / Software Solutions (Capture & Distribution) / Software Solutions (Document Management) / Software Solutions (Output Management) / Software Solutions (Device Management) / Copy Productivity / Actual Copying Time / Print Performance / Copy Image Quality / Print Image Quality / Scan Image Quality 3. One-to-One Comparison with Competitors’ Models • Vs. Canon imageRUNNER ADVANCE C7065/C7055 series • Vs. Canon imageRUNNER ADVANCE C9075 PRO/C9070 PRO/C9065 PRO/9060 PRO series • Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP C7501SP/C6501SPseries • Vs. Xerox WorkCentre 7775/7765/7755 series • Vs. Fuji Xerox DocuCentre-III C7600/C6500/C5500 series • Vs. Fuji Xerox ApeosPort-III C7600/C6500/C5500 series • Vs. Konica Minolta bizhub C652 DS/C552 DS series • Vs. Konica Minolta bizhub PRO C6501SP/C5501series • Vs. Sharp MX-6201N/7001N series
Canon – Competitor Models – • Comparison of externals and print speed (B&W / Full Color) Image RUNNER ADVANCE C7065 series Image RUNNER ADVANCE C9075 PRO series e-STUDIO6550C series Note: The models recorded by a magenta character are production printing models.
Ricoh – Competitor Models – • Comparison of externals and print speed (B&W / Full Color) e-STUDIO6550C series Aficio MP C7501SP series
Xerox – Competitor Models – • Comparison of externals and print speed (B&W / Full Color) e-STUDIO6550C series WorkCentre 7775 series Xerox Color 560 series Note: The models recorded by a blue character are professional color models.
Fuji Xerox – Competitor Models – • Comparison of externals and print speed (B&W / Full Color) DocuCentre/ApeosPort-III 7600 series e-STUDIO6550C series
Konica Minolta – Competitor Models – • Comparison of externals and print speed (B&W / Full Color) e-STUDIO6550C series bizhub C652DS series bizhub PRO C6501SP series Note: The models recorded by a magenta character are production printing models.
Sharp – Competitor Models – • Comparison of externals and print speed (B&W / Full Color) e-STUDIO6550C series MX-7001N series
Touch Panel (1) Toshiba e-STUDIO6550C series Canon imageRUNNER ADVANVE C7065 series 8.4 inches 10.4 inches Ricoh Aficio MP C7501SP series 10.4 inches (Option) 8.5 inches
Touch Panel (2) Konica Minolta bizhub C652DS series Fuji Xerox DC/AP-III C7600series Xerox WorkCentre 7775 series 8.5 inches 8.4 inches 10.4 inches 10.4 inches(Option) Sharp MX-7001N series 10.4 inches
Media Correspondence (Reference: Case in Japan) Note: Special paper to be used varies depending on the country. Note the use of special paper may be allowed at the dealer’s discretion and responsibility, without any description in product specifications.
Software Solutions (1. Capture & Distribution) • U.S. Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (1. Capture & Distribution) • U.S. Market (Continued) Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (1. Capture & Distribution) • European Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (1. Capture & Distribution) • European Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (1. Capture & Distribution) • Australian Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (2. Document Management) • U.S. Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (2. Document Management) • European Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (2. Document Management) • Australian Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (3. Output Management) • U.S. Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (3. Output Management) • European Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (3. Output Management) • Australian Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (4. Device Management) • U.S. Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (4. Device Management) • U.S. Market (Continued) Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (4. Device Management) • European Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Software Solutions (4. Device Management) • Australian Market Note) The source of this data is software product information that relates to the solution put on the homepage of each MFP manufacturer. (As of August,2011)
Copy Productivity Full color mode B&W mode 11 12
Actual Copying Time Full color mode B&W mode 11 12
Print Performance 2. Ms Excel (Color: 26 pages [20 sheets], 620 KB) • MS Word (Color: 28 pages, B&W: 4 pages, 2,377 KB) 4. Adobe Acrobat PDF (Color: 5 pages, 1,204 KB) 3. MS PowerPoint (Color 6 pages, 756 KB)