1 / 23

Quench Simulation at GSI

Quench Simulation at GSI. FAIR Project. Quench. A sudden transition from the superconducting state to the normal-conducting state. Quench causes: conductor movement eddy currents in the conductor beam losses poor cooling. Self-protecting and not self protecting magnets.

laird
Download Presentation

Quench Simulation at GSI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quench Simulation at GSI August 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 1

  2. FAIR Project June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 2

  3. Quench • A sudden transition from the superconducting state to the normal-conducting state. • Quench causes: • conductor movement • eddy currents in the conductor • beam losses • poor cooling June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 3

  4. Self-protecting and not self protecting magnets If max. temp. < 300 (350) K and max. voltages (coil-to-ground, coil-to-coil) do not damage the insulation magnet / group of magnets is self protecting if not Quench protection is required dump resistors, cold diodes, quench heaters etc. June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 4

  5. Self-protecting and not self protecting magnets:Tau and MIITs June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 5

  6. Self-protecting and not self protecting magnets@ FAIR • All Super-FRS magnets - self protecting • SIS100 rings (dipole ring, quadrupoles rings, chromaticity sextupoles - 6 magnets in series, other correctors) – not self-protecting • single SIS100 dipole almost self-protecting • SIS300 magnets – not self-protecting June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 6

  7. FAIR Project: Super-FRS Super-FRS dipole (66 um) Potted coil: 28 layers, 20 turns/layer In= 232 A, Emag=414 kJ DC machine 3D Simulation June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 7

  8. FAIR Project: SIS100 Nuclotron cable SIS100 dipole (2 layer prototype, 4.3 um) June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 8

  9. FAIR Project: SIS100 dipole magnetsfast cycling 2 T/s -> 28 kA/s, one dipole = 47 kJ 1D Simulation Insulated wire and 23 wires + CuNi tube FoS dipole magnet 109 dipoles in series 13.1 kA, 1.9 T, CuMn matrix in order to reduce AC losses June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 9

  10. FAIR Project: SIS100 quadrupole magnets 1D Simulation Insulated wire and 23 wires + CuNi tube up to 84 quadrupoles in series 3 quadrupole circuits: QD, F1 and F2 June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 10

  11. FAIR Project: SIS100 corrector magnets • Chromaticity sextupole magnets • Steering magnets (2 dipoles) • Multipole corrector magnets (Quadrupole + Sextupole + Octupole) 1D Simulation Insulated wire June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 11

  12. TEVATRON FAIR Project: SIS300 Rutherford cable ArjanVerweij’s talk June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 12

  13. FAIR Project: other superconducting magnets • High Energy Beam Transfer Line (HEBT) • SIS300 type magnets (Rutherford cable), line to CBM and beam dump • CBM Dipole • potted coil, “wire in channel”, similar to Super-FRS, 5.15 MJ • Quadrupoles of HEDgeHOB final focusing system (Rutherford cable) June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 13

  14. GSI Quench Program @ microscopic scale @ macroscopic scale June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 14

  15. Heat-balance equation (implicit method) i – position j – time June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 15

  16. GSI Quench Program Equation matrix Initial temperature profile is known! i – position j – time we compute: then electrical equation is updated to avoid high jumps in temperature, an adaptive time stepping algorithm is applied (max dT is fixed) June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 16

  17. 3D Simulation vs. measurements Super-FRS dipole (prototype) June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 17

  18. 3D Simulation vs. measurements Super-FRS dipole (prototype) June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 18

  19. 3D Simulation vs. measurements Super-FRS dipole (prototype) June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 19

  20. 1D Simulation vs. measurements:SIS100 FoS dipole and 2 layer prototype 2 layer prototype FoS dipole June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 20

  21. Conclusion • One need to perform at least simplified quench calculation before the experiment. • Expected max. temp. and max voltages (coil-to-ground and coil-to-coil) need to be known in advance safety of the machine and personnel! • Tmax < 300 (350) K, sometimes lower < 100 K; High Voltage (HV)! Insulation? Electrical sockets? • HV? He gas in the cryostat? Paschen effect! • Small change in MIITs value • corresponds in a big change in Tmax. • Quench calculation is a part of the machine design! June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 21

  22. Thank you for attention! June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 22

  23. Quench Detection June 18th 2014 | TEMF TU Darmstadt / GSI | Piotr Szwangruber | 23

More Related