350 likes | 492 Views
UTILIZATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS IN SOD BASED ROTATIONS M. B. Adjei and J.E. Rechcigl . Objective. Evaluate effect of N source by rate on bahiagrass forage production, and associated groundwater and soil chemical changes. Environmental Concerns. Potential for spread of pathogens
E N D
UTILIZATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS IN SOD BASED ROTATIONS M. B. Adjei and J.E. Rechcigl
Objective Evaluate effect of N source by rate on bahiagrass forage production, and associated groundwater and soil chemical changes.
Environmental Concerns • Potential for spread of pathogens • Accumulation of heavy metals • Nutrient loading and pollution 3b Organic contaminants (dioxin, brominated flame retardants, alkylphenol ethoxylates) • Odor
Materials & Methods • Randomized complete block design with three replicates • 9 Fertilizer treatments: • Sources: (4) • Ammonium nitrate • Liquid sludge pH 7 • Liquid sludge pH11 • Lime stabilized cake biosolid • Control
Materials & Methods contd. • Fertilizer rates: • 0 lb/A (Control) • 80 lb/A • 160 lb/A • Fertilizer application: • Applied July 1997 during bahiagrass plot establishment. • Repeated on same plots in April-May, 1998. • Repeated on same plots in March 1999, 2000.
Water sample processing • Determine pH and Conductivity • Acidify to pH<2 • P, & trace metals ( nitric acid) • N fractions (conc. H2SO4) • immediately froze samples until analyzed
Fertilizer Treatments • 1) Ammonium nitrate: 80 lb/A(AML) • 2) Ammonium nitrate: 160 lb/A(AMH) • 3) Liquid sludge pH 7: 80 lb/A (LS7L) • 4) Liquid sludge pH 7: 160 lb/A (LS7H) • 5) Liquid sludge pH 11: 80 lb/A (LS11L) • 6) Liquid sludge pH 11: 160 lb/A (LS11H) • 7) Cake biosolid: 80 lb/A (CBL) • 8) Cake biosolid: 160 lb/A (CBH) • 9) Control 0 kg lb/A (CONT)
Measured Variables • Forage: • (DMY, CP, Tissue minerals) • Groundwater: 2ft vs. 4ft wells • (pH, NaCl, Trace metals, Plant nutrients) • Soil: 3 depths • (pH, Trace metals, Plant nutrients)
Survey of groundwater quality • 3 county sites: Desoto, Hardee, Manatee • 3 treatments: • Control • Ammonium nitrate (80 lb/A) • Sludge/biosolid (80 lb/A) • pH, trace metals & plant nutrients
Results • Forage measures • Yield • CP, IVOMD • Nutrient uptake (N, P, K Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn) • Groundwater • pH, NaCl • Trace metals (Ba Cd Ni Pb) • Plant nutrients (P NO3) • Soil (Zn & Mn accumulated under LS7-160)
a a a ab ab ab bc cd d a a a b b b bc bc bc b b b b b b b cd d a b bc bc bc bcd cd cd cd d
Conclusions • Forage yield and quality were similar for liquid sludge and ammonium nitrate. • Greater forage uptake of P, K, Ca, Fe from sludge sources of fertilizer ‘cause of greater nutrient availability & improved soil pH. • P concentration in groundwater not affected by N-source but 10 times higher (3 ppm) above than below (0.3 ppm) the spodic horizon .
Conclusions Contd. • Trace metal concentrations were negligible. • Spikes of NO3 in surface groundwater exceeding 10 mg L-1 occurred in shallow wells within 60 d period of grass establishment following ammonium nitrate application and also at Dump site.
Conclusions contd. • Tendency for pH and P to increase in soil from repeated use. Sod based rotations will provide the needed break. • Supplemental K and Mn may be needed. • Wastewater residuals could be an inexpensive and safe alternative N-source for sod based rotations if used judiciously.
Acknowledgment • Authors acknowledge with thanks the financial support provided by the FDACS- NBMP Program & the USDA Smith-Lever Water Quality Extension Award.