1 / 11

Regulatory Program Updates

Regulatory Program Updates. Mitigation – Federal requirements increased WRDA 214 – permanent authority remains our common goal Appeals – DE’s decisions under review Regional Interagency agreement Marci Cook will address sediment (SEF/RSET) issues. New Mitigation Rule.

lars-sutton
Download Presentation

Regulatory Program Updates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regulatory Program Updates • Mitigation – Federal requirements increased • WRDA 214 – permanent authority remains our common goal • Appeals – DE’s decisions under review • Regional Interagency agreement • Marci Cook will address sediment (SEF/RSET) issues

  2. New Mitigation Rule • Why it was Developed? • Mitigation practices varied among Districts • Interagency teams were not always decisive • Existing guidance was non-binding • What does it do? • Consolidates and clarifies prior ‘guidance’ • Provides more mitigation opportunities for permittees • Levels the playing field among mitigation providers • Retains sequencing – avoid, minimize, compensate • Promotes consistency, predictability & accountability

  3. General Principles • Does not change when mitigation is required • Does change where and how • Self-sustaining aquatic resources to replace lost functions in the watershed are achieved • Responsibility for mitigation transferred from permittee to sponsors (banks/ILF) • Corps has the final decision on all: • Approval of banks or ILF programs • Mitigation for Dept of Army permits

  4. Mitigation Process • To create a new bank or In-Lieu Fee program • Sponsor submits prospectus to the Corps for approval • Public Notice and comment process • Interagency review, w/dispute resolution process if needed • Instrument is vetted and approved • Rule establishes timeframes for DE’s decisions to approve mitigation sponsor Extensions to timeframes may occur (e.g., ESA or Tribal consultations)

  5. Mitigation Process… • Mitigation instruments in process today must be approved by a Commander by July 9th or sponsor needs to start over adhering to new process • Corps approval is needed to release credits to sponsors • Corps approval is needed to utilize credits for meeting compensation requirements of DA permits

  6. Benefits of the Mitigation Rule • Improved mitigation performance • Increased efficiency in instrument approval process • Streamlines permit process thru preference for existing approved mitigation sources • Strongly encourages watershed approach • Formalizes procedures and Federal policy for mitigation (may differ from States)

  7. WRDA 214 • Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 allows non-Federal public entities to provide funds to expedite permit processing • WRDA 2007 extended expiration to Dec 2009 • Nationally 37 entities fund 48 positions in 15 Districts • Allows districts to be more responsive to all customers

  8. WRDA 214 • DEs are authorized to accept & expend funds contributed by non-Federal public entities • Public Notice & comment process used • DE’s basis is compliant with the Act • Accountability of usage of these funds is tracked up to the Army level • Several Ports have such agreements (Seattle, Tacoma and Vancouver) • Permanent authority being sought by Army

  9. Port Issues • Administrative Appeals – 5 now in NWD • Port of Arlington has appealed permit denial by Portland District • NWD reviewing 14 reasons presented in the Request For Appeal • Planning on conference this month • NWD Commander is decision-maker • Options are to remand to district or uphold

  10. Interagency issues • Corps, EPA, Fish & Wildlife & NOAA Fisheries met with PNWA in Oct 2007 • Renewed commitment made verbally • Improving Sediment review process a priority • Making the new Mitigation and Jurisdictional processes efficient and effective also a priority • Elevation of issues to region always an option • Next Steps • Finalize revised agreement by July 2008 • Organize working session on improving SEF • Continue the dialogue

  11. Questions? • Regulatory Program Regional POC is Karen Kochenbach, 503-808-3888 or karen.a.kochenbach@usace.army.mil • Mitigation - Regional Subject Matter Expert is Ms. Corrie Veenstra at Portland District, 503-808-4378 • Check the Web for details at www.nwd.usace.army.mil/et/reg/home

More Related