100 likes | 239 Views
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Author of Record Workgroup and Harmonization of UC 1&2 Workgroup. Friday, September 14, 2012. Meeting Etiquette. Please announce your name each time prior to making comments or suggestions during the call
E N D
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)Author of Record Workgroup and Harmonization of UC 1&2 Workgroup Friday, September 14, 2012
Meeting Etiquette • Please announce your name each time prior to making comments or suggestions during the call • Remember: If you are not speaking keep your phone on mute • Do not put your phone on hold – if you need to take a call, hang up and dial in again when finished with your other call • Hold = Elevator Music = very frustrated speakers and participants • This meeting, like all of our meetings, is being recorded • Another reason to keep your phone on mute when not speaking! • Feel free to use the “Chat” or “Q&A” feature for questions or comments From S&I Framework to Participants: Hi everyone: remember to keep your phone on mute NOTE: This meeting is being recorded and will be posted on the esMD Wiki page after the meeting
Announcements • Schedule next week:
September 2012 Proposed Schedule AoR L1 UC E2E Review AoR L1 UC E2E Review AoR L1 UC Consensus AoR L1 UC Consensus
Recap of Last Meeting • Completed the E2E Review by reviewing comments with the community • Initiated the Consensus voting period for the AoR L1 UC • Discussed the AoR Sub-Workgroups
Today’s Objectives • Provide AoR L1 UC Consensus voting results • Conduct a round-robin verbal consensus vote for committed members who did not submit a vote via the online form • Provide an overview of the UC 1 Provider Registration Implementation Guide (IG) • Begin review of the UC 1 IG
AoR L1 UC Consensus Voting Results • 5 Yes Votes • No comments or modifications to the UC
Consensus Voting Round Robin for Committed Members • Yes • A Yes vote does not necessarily mean that the deliverable is the ideal one from the perspective of the Initiative Member, but that it is better to move forward than to block the deliverable • Yes with comments • If a Consensus Process attracts significant comments (through Yes with comment votes), it is expected that the comments be addressed in a future revision of the deliverable. • Formal Objection- with comments • Indicating a path to address the objection in a way that meets the known concerns of other members of the Community of Interest. "Formal Objection" vote without such comments will be considered Abstain votes. • Formal Objection • Should a Consensus Process attract even one "Formal Objection" vote with comments from an Initiative Member, the deliverable must be revised to address the "Formal Objection" vote (unless an exceptional process is declared). • Abstain (decline to vote) 9
Harmonization of UC 1 • Provider Registration Implementation Guide Overview