430 likes | 572 Views
Evaluating Online Learning Materials in MERLOT. Jeanne Sewell MERLOT Associate Editor Health Sciences Editorial Board. Objectives. Discuss the advantages of MERLOT membership Compare and contrast the classifications of MERLOT learning resources Contribute to the MERLOT collection
E N D
Evaluating Online Learning Materials in MERLOT Jeanne Sewell MERLOT Associate Editor Health Sciences Editorial Board
Objectives • Discuss the advantages of MERLOT membership • Compare and contrast the classifications of MERLOT learning resources • Contribute to the MERLOT collection • Experience examples of best practice
What is MERLOT? • Links to learning materials • Sample assignments • Evaluations of the learning materials • Links to a community of people with common interests in teaching & learning • Personal Collections of learning materials (with links to others)
Shared Learning Resources Learners Teachers
Communities Health Sciences Resources
Browse Materials Search By: Author Names Title URL Discipline
Why? Benefits the community of teachers • Guide faculty members • Feedback for authors
What’s New? • Federated Search Tool Search within 3 databases: • MERLOT • EdNA Online - Education Network Australia • SMETE Digital Library - Collection of science, mathematics, engineering and technology education (Affiliated Communities)
What’s New? • Teaching and Learning Community • Accessibility • Assessment and Evaluation • Best Practices • Instructional Design • Policies • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning • Selecting Tools • Support and Training • Websites
Why User Comments? Benefits the content developer • Fosters collegial coaching, mentoring & collaboration • Provides evidence of quality & value for teaching portfolios
Teaching & Learning Field Testing Learning Assessment Guide
Evaluation Standards • Quality of Content • Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching-Learning Tool • Ease of Use Rating • Your Rating • General Remarks • Technical Remarks
Biology Business Chemistry Engineering Health Science History Information Technology Mathematics Music Physics Psychology Teacher Education Teaching & Technology World Languages 14 Discipline Communities
Peer Review Standards • Quality of content • Potential effectiveness as a teaching-learning tool • Ease of use
Peer Review Process • Evaluation Standards • Rating System
Peer Review Process Stage 2 – “Intensive” Reviews • Members assigned materials • Discipline leaders notify authors • Teams of 2 review material • Individual review using Module Review Form • Summarize using Narrative Review Form
Report Evaluations • Post reviews • Send review to authors for • feedback • permission to post in MERLOT • Post the Peer Review report in MERLOT