1 / 14

Field test results on W4: Mobility Margie Schneider

This presentation focuses on the field test results of mobility data collected during the 6th Meeting of the Washington Group. The presentation includes an analysis of core vs. detailed questions, crosstabulations for core questions, analysis by age and sex in Vietnam, and separate analyses of the cognitive data set in Gambia, Vietnam, and South Africa.

leahm
Download Presentation

Field test results on W4: Mobility Margie Schneider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Field test results on W4: MobilityMargie Schneider 6th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala,Uganda 10 – 13th October 2006

  2. Structure of presentation • Results • Core vs detailed Questions • Crosstabulations for core Q by individual detailed Qs (correspondence) • Analysis by age and sex (Vietnam) • Separate analysis of • cognitive data set • Gambia • Vietnam • South Africa

  3. Core vs detailed Qs: Mobility

  4. Crosstabulations

  5. Comments • ‘Move inside home’ : more severe difficulties than on W3 Mobility. • ‘unable to do’ for moving inside home mostly ‘no’ on W3 mobility and many opn ‘some’ and ‘a lot’ • 2 different aspects of mobility – moving within a small space vs walking (outside? And for a distance?) and climbing stairs? • Similar results for ‘moving outside home’

  6. Walking a long distance Better correspondence between responses on Core and detailed question

  7. Gambia

  8. Good correspondence between responses on W3 and • those on all four questions. • For walk long distance and use of hands/fingers there • is a trend to use adjacent response categories as • frequently.

  9. Comments on Vietnam • Good (but not very good) correspondence between W3 mobility responses and detailed question responses • Unable on detailed = ‘a lot’ on W3 • ‘A lot’ on detailed = ‘some’ on W3 • Additional Qs: (excl. inside, outside, long distance) • Stoop, crouch, kneel • Set for 2 hrs • Stand for 2 hrs • Walk 400 m • Walk ten steps

  10. Vietnam Mobility by age

  11. Vietnam Mobility by sex

More Related