540 likes | 1.22k Views
Audit. A systematic and independent examination of trial related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial related activities were conducted and the data were recorded analysed and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's standard operating procedures (SOPs) Good Clinical Practice , and the applicable regulatory requirements ICH 1.6.
E N D
1. GCP AUDIT AND INSPECTION - ARE YOU READY ?
Joan Perou
November 2005
3. Inspection The act by a Competent Authority of conducting an official review of documents, facilities, records, quality assurance arrangements, and any other resources that are deemed by the competent authority to be related to the clinical trial and that may be located at the site of the trial at the sponsor’s and/or contract research organisations’s facilities or at other establishments which the competent authority sees fit to inspect
EU Directive 2(l)
ICH 1.29
4. EU Directive on GCP in Clinical Trials (2001/20/EC) Verification of compliance (Article 15)
Member states shall appoint inspectors to verify compliance with GCP and GMP at any time before, during, after the trial at:
trial sites
manufacturing site of investigational product
laboratories used for analyses
sponsor premises
5. The Role of the European Medicines Agency European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) based in London. Referred to as ‘The Agency’ in the Directive.
The European Medicines Evaluation Agency changed its name in 2004 to become the European Medicines Agency
‘Inspections may be requested and coordinated by the European Medicines Agency’ (Directive 2005/28)
In Directive 2001/20 The EMEA is referred to sometimes by its full name and sometimes as the Agency.
In Directive 2005/28 the European Medicines Agency is referred to. They are the same organisation. They changed their name in 2004 from the European Medicines Evaluation Agency to the European Medicines Agency.
The are a European organisation, coincidentally based in London.
They are responsible for co-ordinating inspections within Member States.In Directive 2001/20 The EMEA is referred to sometimes by its full name and sometimes as the Agency.
In Directive 2005/28 the European Medicines Agency is referred to. They are the same organisation. They changed their name in 2004 from the European Medicines Evaluation Agency to the European Medicines Agency.
The are a European organisation, coincidentally based in London.
They are responsible for co-ordinating inspections within Member States.
6. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) UK ‘Competent Authority’ (CA)
Based in London
Grants licences to conduct trials
Monitors safety aspects of trials
Provides enforcement - mandatory inspections started
1 May 2004
The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency are the U.K. competent authority responsible.
They are based in London
Give licences to conduct clinical trials, the CTAs
Monitor safety aspects of trials
Inspect predominately U.K. studies but will also inspect centres that are part of a multi-centre study if requested to do so by the EMAThe Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency are the U.K. competent authority responsible.
They are based in London
Give licences to conduct clinical trials, the CTAs
Monitor safety aspects of trials
Inspect predominately U.K. studies but will also inspect centres that are part of a multi-centre study if requested to do so by the EMA
7. Types of Inspection Trial related
Systems
‘For Cause’
‘Voluntary Inspection
(finished April 2004) What types of inspection:
Trial related where the inspectors will mainly review trial data and will track the audit trail – from the very start of the study right along the path of the trial.
Inspectors will check the dates, example the date of the final protocol, when the protocol was given approval through the various agencies. The dates the supplies were sent to the centre, the dates the patients were entered etc. Dates, version numbers are all expected to be consistent.
A systems inspection is where processes and procedures are checked to make sure that for instance proper Standard Operating Procedures are in place to allow consistent working practices in compliance with GCP
For cause is where there is an inspection scheduled for a reason. The Inspectors arrive because they believe there are issues of non-GCP compliance that they need to investigate further.
The voluntary inspection programme in the U.K. finished in April 2004. Under the voluntary scheme pharma companies, contract research organisations and trial sites were able to volunteer to host an inspection to enable them to ascertain their own strengths and weaknesses prior to the mandatory inspections taking place. This scheme finished on 30 April when the mandatory inspections startedWhat types of inspection:
Trial related where the inspectors will mainly review trial data and will track the audit trail – from the very start of the study right along the path of the trial.
Inspectors will check the dates, example the date of the final protocol, when the protocol was given approval through the various agencies. The dates the supplies were sent to the centre, the dates the patients were entered etc. Dates, version numbers are all expected to be consistent.
A systems inspection is where processes and procedures are checked to make sure that for instance proper Standard Operating Procedures are in place to allow consistent working practices in compliance with GCP
For cause is where there is an inspection scheduled for a reason. The Inspectors arrive because they believe there are issues of non-GCP compliance that they need to investigate further.
The voluntary inspection programme in the U.K. finished in April 2004. Under the voluntary scheme pharma companies, contract research organisations and trial sites were able to volunteer to host an inspection to enable them to ascertain their own strengths and weaknesses prior to the mandatory inspections taking place. This scheme finished on 30 April when the mandatory inspections started
8. Inspection Preparation
Refer to SOPs
Appoint Inspection Co-ordinator
Contact with the MHRA
Respond to document requests from MHRA
Training (including inspection training!)
Ensure CVs, job descriptions are current
Progress meetings with everyone involved
Personal preparation
9. Inspection Preparation Documentation
Review and learn SOPs on documentation/process
Document review - on selected trials
File notes
‘Tidy up’ of files and filing area
Clear and consistent labelling
Security/access to documents
Correct terminology - archive or storage area ?
Archives
10. Inspection Preparation Centre
Communication between PI, study team, sponsor
Update training for investigator and study team - regulatory and study specific
Check CVs and training records and update to include latest training
Check Investigator Site Files – emails should be printed off and all documentation up to date and compliant with Essential Documents
Check IMP - storage/temperature logs, accountability
Check equipment - calibration and servicing
Ensure copies of ICH and the Directive are available
11. GCP Inspection Inspection Day
Inspectors will work to Inspection Plan
Appointed co-ordinator should be available to assist Inspectors throughout
Facilities Check
Pre-inspection meeting
Interviews - according to Inspection Plan
Process and document review
12. Inspection Process
Background information
Interview technique
Facilities information
Documentation – records, files, patient notes
Systems – processes and SOPs
Equipment check – calibration and servicing
13. Post- Inspection
Close-out meeting
Findings discussed
Report issued
Actions from report finalised
14. What are the Inspectors looking for ?
Evidence of compliance and
Total Quality Management Systems
Documents:
Data trail required
Dates and version numbers of documents
Evidence of distribution/receipt and document control systems
Clear labelling/indices on files
General tidiness, file notes if necessary but no yellow stickies !
15. What are the Inspectors looking for ?
Evidence of compliance and
Total Quality Management Systems
Standard Operating Procedures/processes should be:
GCP Compliant
Reflect current working practices
Controlled, updated, managed
Implemented only after training
16. What are the Inspectors looking for ? Evidence of compliance and
Total Quality Management Systems
Databases
Archiving
Contracts
Training records/CVs
SOPs for related departments
Communication flow across departments
Equipment
Security
Emergency out of hours procedures
17. ICH E6 GCP Document 1.0 Definitions
2.0 Principles of ICH GCP
3.0 Ethics Committees
4.0 Investigator Responsibilities
5.0 Sponsor Responsibilities
6.0 Protocol/Amendments Format
7.0 Investigator Brochure Format
8.0 Essential Documents
18. Essential Documents are those documents which individually and collectively permit evaluation of the conduct of the trial and the quality of the data produced. These documents serve to demonstrate the compliance of the investigator, sponsor, and monitor with the standards of Good Clinical Practice and with all applicable regulatory requirements.
19. Files and Procedures Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS)
(Provide overall guidance/policy)
Department or clinical trial unit processes
(Detail working procedures)
Trial Master File
(maintained by Sponsor)
Investigator Centre File
(maintained by Investigator/study team)
20. ICH E6 GCP DocumentSection 8.0 on Essential Documents 8.2 Lists all those documents that must be on file prior to start of study
8.3 Lists all those documents which may require updating during the course of the study
8.4 Lists all those documents which need to be added to the other two sections at the end of the study to complete the Trial Master File prior to archiving.
21. The Centre Investigator File
Sample list (see ICH 8.0 for complete list)
Investigator Brochure (current version)
Final Protocol + amendments (all signed and dated)
Ethics Committee documentation
Study correspondence
Original signed consent form(s) for each patient
CV of Investigator and study team
Delegation log/signature record
Serious adverse event reports (copies)
Laboratory normal ranges/methods
22. Sample only - see ICH 8.0 for complete list
Patient Enrolment Log
Training certificates for study team
Calibration certificates for study equipment
Randomisation codes
Monitoring visit log
Subject screening log
Drug receipt/dispensing documentation
23.
Ensure the staff delegation log is up to date:
Should list names of staff delegated to each procedure
Should reflect the current situation
Should be signed by the investigator, and updated when appropriate throughout trial.
Copy available in Trial Master File (sponsor) and Investigator Site File
If new staff are recruited the list should be updated, but old versions must not be destroyed.
24. Investigator Brochure
Mandatory requirement for trials using unlicensed products.
The most recent version should be held on file at centre
A log on file should track previous versions if removed
Safety update letters should be filed together with Investigator Brochures.
Updated versions of the Investigator Brochures should include the safety updates.
Investigator Brochures should be updated at least annually.
25. Amendments Any change to the protocol is an amendment
All ‘substantial’ amendments must be sent to ethics committees and the MHRA
There must be a letter of favourable opinion from the ethics committee (within 35 days) before the amendment can be implemented .
The MHRA will not review all amendments but the ethics committee will given an opinion.
It is important that all amendments are tracked so that their status is known.
26. Inspectors will check the following have been obtained:
Clinical Trial Authorisation from Competent Authority
Favourable opinion from a Recognised ethics committee
Opinion on suitability of local investigator and facilities from local ethics committee
Permission from NHS Trust for trial to take place within that Trust (R & D approval)
Eudract number from the Eudract database for all trials which commenced after 1st May 2004
27.
CRITICAL
MAJOR
OTHER
28. Inspection Findings Centre:
Absence of investigator from trial related duties/monitoring visits - heavy delegation
Inappropriate delegation of duties.
Dating of consent form by inappropriate person
Inadequate training records/CVS
Insufficient certificates/calibration of equipment.
Temperature logs not kept for investigational product
29. Inspection Feedback MHRA requested:
Index of SOPs
Organigrams
Summary of responsibility of departments involved in clinical trials
Overview of Trust arrangements for trials
Protocols, consent forms and patient information sheets for those trials selected
MHRA selected names from organigrams
Trust had no influence on trials selected
MHRA not interested in investigator status
30. Inspection Feedback MHRA priorities (according to Bristol)
Non-commercial trials
Paediatric studies
Investigators conducting numerous trials
Greatest number of patients at risk
Anything that would jeopardise patient safety
Trust systems and procedures
Evidence of training - certificates reviewed
Procedures in place to terminate study in event of emergency situations
31. Inspection Feedback Lessons Learned
Trust systems and processes must incorporate SOPs for clinical research
Archiving of records must be sufficient to ‘reconstruct’ trial if required by MHRA
Disaster recovery plan must be in place in case of emergency
All staff must be trained - this should include basic training for those not directly involved in research, I.e. I.T. staff and medical records staff
Formulate an action plan for what you feel is not ‘perfect’ and set a time frame for action - prepare this prior to the Inspection
32. EU Directive On GCP in Clinical Trials (2001/20/EC) Article 1
Good clinical practice is a set of internationally recognised ethical and scientific quality requirements which must be observed for designing, conducting, recording and reporting clinical trials that involve the participation of human subject.
Compliance with this good practice provides assurance that the rights, safety and well-being of trial subjects are protected, and that the results of the clinical trials are credible.
33.
A person does not commit an offence under these Regulations if he took all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of that offence.
Where evidence is adduced which is sufficient to raise an issue with respect to that defence, the court or jury shall assume that the defence is satisfied unless the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that it is not
34. Key Messages Document everything - ‘if it isn’t in writing it is a rumour!’
Ensure you have a verifiable ‘data trail’ for each trial
Identify all trial documents with appropriate reference numbers, dates and version numbers
Work to clearly defined written processes
Know your own role/responsibility and competencies
Ensure you are properly trained (with training records)
Ensure all safety reporting is done on time
Pay extra attention to the consent procedure and documentation