170 likes | 292 Views
Response to Intervention in School Improvement Plans . Macomb ISD April, 2011. Problem-Solving Model. Dr. Judy Elliot. Chief Academic Officer for Los Angeles Unified Schools. Response to Intervention is…. the practice of providing high-quality
E N D
Response to Intervention in School Improvement Plans Macomb ISD April, 2011
Dr. Judy Elliot Chief Academic Officer for Los Angeles Unified Schools
Response to Intervention is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and level of performance to inform educational decisions Source: NASDSE. Response to Intervention: policy considerations and implementation Updated & Adapted January 2011 - MISD 4 IDEA Partnership
RtI Core Principles We can effectively teach all children Intervene early Use a multi-tier model of service delivery Use a problem-solving methodology
RtI Core Principles (2) Use research-based, scientifically validated interventions/instruction Monitor student progress to inform instruction Use data to make decisions Use assessments for three different purposes: (1) screening; (2) diagnostics; and (3) progress monitoring
RTI Steps Core Instruction implemented with fidelity Universal Screening/Data Collection (3x yr) Data reviews by Building/Grade Level/Dept. Teams Evaluate the success of core program, modify as needed Tier 2 interventions and Intense Tier 3 interventions Progress monitoring data is collected for Tier 2 and 3 Data reviews of progress monitoring data by Building/Grade Level Team Evaluate the success of tier 2 and 3 interventions, modify as needed Evaluation of Implementation 7
How Do We Sustain RtI • Organized by both building level and district school improvement plans • Driven by Professional Development • Supported by Coaching and Technical Assistance • Informed by DATA
Resources for You http://misdrti.weebly.com/
Strategies:RTI for Reading Goal Strategy #1: School Wide Data-based decision making process for Tier I, II, and III Strategy #2: Tier I Close and Critical Reading Strategy #3: Tier 2 Reading Interventions Strategy #4: Tier 3 Intensive Reading Interventions
Data-Based Decision Making Nine actions to carryout this strategy 4 related to Tier I 4 related to Tiers II and III Evaluation of Implementation
Data-Based Decision MakingTier I Activity #1:Tier I Data Collection Activity #2:Tier I Data Input and Report Generation Activity #3:Tier I Data Analysis and Dialogue Activity #4: Professional Development for Tier I Data Collection and Analysis
Data-Based Decision MakingTier 2 and 3 Activity #5:Tier 2 Progress Monitoring Activity #6:Tier 2 and 3 Data Input and Report Generation Activity #7:Tier 2 and 3 Progress Monitoring Data Analysis and Dialogue Activity #8: Professional Development for Tier 2 and 3 Data Collection and Analysis
Evaluation of school-wide data-based decision making implementation
Evaluating ImplementationSAPSI Self-Assessment of Problem Solving Implementation (SAPSI)*
Evaluating ImplementationSWEPT Middle School Literacy School-Wide Evaluation & Planning Tool (SWEPT) Middle School Literacy Self-assessment tool addresses seven elements of an effective schoolwide reading program Goals and Objectives • Assessment • Instructional Practices • Instructional Time • Differentiated Instruction/Grouping • Administration/Organization/Communication • Professional Development