290 likes | 439 Views
DAEDALUS EC 5th framework: aerosol users survey. Olivier Boucher Laboratoire d ’Optique Atmosphérique USTL / CNRS, Villeneuve d ’Ascq, France Gerrit de Leeuw TNO, The Hague, Netherlands and the DAEDALUS team. DAEDALUS: an FP5 GMES project. D elivery of AE rosol pro D ucts for
E N D
DAEDALUS EC 5th framework: aerosol users survey Olivier Boucher Laboratoire d ’Optique Atmosphérique USTL / CNRS, Villeneuve d ’Ascq, France Gerrit de Leeuw TNO, The Hague, Netherlands and the DAEDALUS team
DAEDALUS: an FP5 GMES project Delivery of AErosol proDucts for Assimilation and environmentaLUSe • specially written for the recent • GMES call for proposal of the EESD • 3 year project: Jan 2003 - Dec 2005 • 7 partners: F, B, NL, N, P + JRC • run in parallel with another “aerosol” • EC project (CREATE)
Reasons for getting interested in atmospheric aerosols: • visibility ==> tourism, aviation • air quality issues ==> human health, ecosystems • deposition and acid rain issues ==> ecosystems • climate effect (clear-sky, cloudy-sky) • - anthropogenic aerosols are responsible for a radiative forcing • - anthropogenic aerosols may modify the hydrological cycle • - natural aerosols may response to climate change • satellite atmospheric corrections • ==> retrieval of the properties of ocean, land, and atmosphere • role of aerosol deposition on ocean biology • improvement in meteorological (re)analysis • improvements in weather forecasts ? • depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer
As aerosol concentrations increase and visibility decreases, there is - a whitening of the landscape, - loss of texture, - loss of contrast.
WP1: Users needs * 2-page questionnaire on tropospheric and stratospheric aerosol products * Questionnaire was sent out by e-mail to over 200 people across Europe * 33 answers received so far (most are users, some producers, some inconsistencies) * Several talks and posters presented at this workshop CERMES, ADEME, EPA Ireland, …
Role of organization 4 University + 15 Research Centres
Aerosol properties of interest 97% of users interested in aerosols (3% in gas species) 91% of users interested in tropospheric aerosols 38% of users interested in stratospheric aerosols
Satellite Data 97% of users would consider satellite data if available and in a suitable format Spatial resolution Time resolution (average) Timeliness
Model Aerosol Forecast 67% of users would consider model forecast if available and in a suitable format Spatial resolution Time resolution (average) Timeliness
Conclusions • 200 potential users contacted; 33 answers • Semi-quantitative analysis of answers BUT • each user is unique • we should not try to please an “average” user • some users not covered (aviation, army, ...) • Interest for both tropospheric and stratospheric aerosols • Very positive feeling for satellite data • Positive feeling for model forecast (near real time needed) DAEDALUS / users dinner scheduled at 8.30pm Mexican restaurant 7 Koningin Wilhelmina Boulevard, Noordwijk Reservation for 10 +/-2 people made
http://www-loa.univ-lille1.fr/Daedalus boucher@loa.univ-lille1.fr END Appendix on MODIS Rapid Response Team http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov
Terra Aqua TDRSS USDA Forest Service Remote Sensing Application Center Direct Broadcast Receiving Station EDOS NOAA/NESDIS University of Maryland Geography Dept Rapid Response System NASA/GSFC GES DAAC NASA/GSFC L1B Data MODIS Rapid Response Project: Data Flow ChartJacques Descloitres – Rapid Response Team December 2001 T+30min Cumulative Fire Maps http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us Backup Feed L1B Data Updated 3 times daily Active Fire Locations Burn Severity Maps Application-specific products T+4hrs Active Fire Locations Selected Imagery Active Fire Locations GOFC Fire Partners MODIS L0 Data T+2-3hrs T+4hrs Active Fire and Corrected Reflectance http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov NASA Earth Observatory http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov Web Fire Mapper http://maps.geog.umd.edu MODIS home page http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov
Biscuit and Tiller Fires in California and Oregon (08/14/02) – Courtesy of J. Descloitres
MODIS Rapid Response known applications users http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov • USDA Forest Service (Remote Sensing Applications Center, Fire Sciences Lab): fire monitoring within the US, burn severity assessment, smoke monitoring and emissions • National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC): GOFC/GOLD (Global Observation of Forest Cover and Land Dynamics) regional networks: fire monitoring across the world • Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Teams (BEAR): mitigating impacts of fires on water quality and ecology • USDA Foreign Agriculture Service: worldwide crop monitoring and forecasting • Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC) and UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR): worldwide fire monitoring and early warning of fire danger • Conservation International: early warning of fires in protected areas across the world • Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) and Navy’s Naval Research Laboratory (NRL): worldwide and regional monitoring of dust storms, smoke, fires, volcanic ash, and snow conditions • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Environmental Sciences Division: oil well fires and smoke monitoring in Iraq • Dartmouth Flood Observatory: worldwide flood monitoring • University of Cape Town: near-real-time monitoring and early warning of hydrogen sulphide eruptions off Namibia • Canadian Ice Service: operational monitoring of ice conditions in Canadian coastal waters • Earth Observatory: PR imagery and provision of early imagery in response to Natural Hazards
CREATE-DAEDALUS Methods Intercomparison of satellite data Harmonization of in-situ data and format Analysis of network sustainability Aerosol satellite retrievals Quality assurance User survey Training Prototype of aerosol data assimilation systems Modelling HARMONIZED IN-SITU AEROSOL DATABASE & STRATEGY STEPS TOWARDS AN AEROSOL MONITORING SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION OF GMES
Results: information on aerosol 2. Model application
Lessons learned / Recommendations • CREATE • Emission databases are not accurate enough to predict evolution of aerosol fields over Europe • Validation of satellite derived aerosol products is needed from in-situ ground truth and vertical profile (sunphotometer / lidar) data • Measurement programmes should have long term continuity and not subject to vagaries of short term funding • Observational capacity needs to be increased • DAEDALUS • Difficulty in accessing and distributing processed data from ESA • Availability of model results and forecasts should be improved. • No infrastructure for a fully-European network of sunphotometers (e.g., integration of PHOTONS / GAW needed) • Ingredients start to be available for an operational aerosol monitoring system although some work still needed for satellite aerosol retrieval and assimilation techniques.
Ground-based networks AERONET (PHOTONS) aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov www-loa.univ-lille1.fr/photons EARLINET World Data Centre for Aerosols (GAW / WMO) www.ei.jrc.it/wdca/ + EMEP / IMPROVE lidarb.dkrz.de/earlinet/
Atmospheric aerosols are particles of natural or anthropogenic origin in suspension in the air. Typical sizes of 10 nm to 100 m, with different roles of the very fine mode (below 100 nm), accumulation mode (0.1 to 1 m), and the coarse mode (1 to 10 m). Chemical composition varies: sulfate, nitrate, organics, black carbon, sea salt, dust, (may also carry some carcirogenic compounds) Particulate matter: PM1, PM2.5, or PM10. Typical lifetime of 5 to 10 days in the lower troposphere.
United-States • Clean Air act (1977) • ==> IMPROVE network (measurements) • ==> EPA (emissions) • NADP network for acid rain monitoring • Europe • Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollutants • ==> EMEP (emissions, measurements, modelling) • organized in different task forces • includes both gas and aerosol species • Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) • (aims at a long-term, strategic and integrated policy to • protect against air pollution effects on human health and env.) • post-Kyoto? • -black carbon aerosol responsible for global warming • -one of the (official) reason for the US to refuse Kyoto • -measurements of black carbon still very delicate • -we do not know yet how to monitor emissions and sinks