1 / 18

Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR To The Proposed Master Plan Improvements at LAX

Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR To The Proposed Master Plan Improvements at LAX. Presentation to Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates October 28, 2003. Project Team. A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates Bauer Environmental Services Michael Brandman Associates

lillian-daugherty
Download Presentation

Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR To The Proposed Master Plan Improvements at LAX

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR To The Proposed Master Plan Improvements at LAX Presentation to Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates October 28, 2003

  2. Project Team • A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates • Bauer Environmental Services • Michael Brandman Associates • BoydForbes, Inc • Mestre Greve Associates • Austin-Foust Associates A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  3. Project Team ( Cont.) • County of Los Angeles Chief Administrative Office • County of Los Angeles County Counsel • County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works • County of Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  4. Major Issues for Consideration • Growth Constraints • Security Plan • Environmental Justice • State and National Environmental Compliance Standards • Noise Assessment • Air Quality • Reasonable Baseline A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  5. Growth Issues • Alternative D will not constrain growth at LAX • Airside gate frontage far exceeds stated levels • Runway design capacity is understated • LAWA itself states, “LAX cannot legally turn away any passenger or aircraft that wants to come to LAX” ( LAX Master Plan, SDEIS/EIR, Questions and Answers, page 3) A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  6. Security Issues • Alternative D will not adequately serve stated security goals • Security Plan relies upon speculative and discredited technology concepts • Security Plan does not address serious security exposures A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  7. Environmental Justice Issues • The negative impacts on communities east and northeast of LA are pervasive • The SDEIS/EIR defers critical evaluations of health impacts • Mitigation measures are vague and poorly defined A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  8. Environmental Justice Issues (Cont.) • Biological resources are protected at the expense of residents in Lennox, Inglewood and Manchester Square • A report authored by the Land Protection Partners states that biological resources are harmed A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  9. Noise and Air Quality Issues • The noise assessment contains significant discrepancies • Quantitative assessment of toxic air pollutant omitted A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  10. State and National Compliance Issues • Scoping Outreach fails to meet National Environmental Policy Act Requirements (NEPA) • Use of a Supplement to a Draft EIS/EIR is improper under CA Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • The SDEIS/EIR contains statements that create an appearance of advocacy A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  11. Baseline Issues • The SDEIS/EIR offers a baseline that is now 7 years old • This is an unacceptable yardstick to measure impacts of Alternative D A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  12. Summary • LAX is vitally important to Southern California • Improvements are needed at LAX, particularly to ensure safety and security A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  13. Summary (Cont.) • LAWA is proposing to implement a flawed project • The process is compromised by an inadequate environmental review A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  14. Summary (Cont.) • The security planning effort is inadequate • There are misleading statements regarding growth potential A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  15. Conclusion • The problems with 2001 and 2003 environmental documents are so pervasively serious that the only practical remedy is to start the process over again • A truly comprehensive and revised SDEIS/EIR must be prepared A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  16. Recommendations For a Revised Document • Provide comprehensive scoping • Use an updated and consistent baseline • Identify and assess a reasonable range of alternatives • Address internal inconsistencies A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  17. Recommendations For a Revised Document (Cont.) • Offer proper levels of analysis and explanation • Present an entirely new complete impact assessment that does not defer critical decisions A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

  18. Finally Only with these extensive modifications can the LAX Master Plan and associated SDEIS/EIR be rendered adequate A.C. Lazzaretto & Associates

More Related