1 / 18

Simulation Results of Microbunching Instability with Velocity Bunched Beam on the FLASH

Explore simulation results on microbunching instability using a velocity bunched beam at the FLASH FEL Beam Dynamics Meeting in 2007. The study includes Velocity Bunching Phase scan, Dipole Magnet Curvature Radius investigations, GlueTrack interpretation, and conclusive findings for future steps.

lisacutler
Download Presentation

Simulation Results of Microbunching Instability with Velocity Bunched Beam on the FLASH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simulation Results ofMicrobunching Instabilitywith Velocity Bunched Beamon the FLASH FEL Beam Dynamics Meeting July 23, 2007 Donghoon Kuk (MPY)

  2. Contents • GlueTrack • Velocity bunching phase(φ2) scan • BC2 dipole magnet curvature bending radius scan • BC3 dipole magnet curvature bending radius scan • Conclusion

  3. GlueTrack Igor Zagorodnov - GlueTrack Interpreter for S2E Beam Dynamic Simulations Jan 23, 2006

  4. From Mikhail Krasilnikov Velocity Bunching Phase Scan • Velocity bunching phase scan (ACC1)

  5. Velocity Bunching Phase Scan • Phi2 Scan (-90˚ ~ -105 ˚) At the End of ACC1

  6. Velocity Bunching Phase Scan • Selected phi2 = -98 ˚

  7. BC2 Scan

  8. BC3 Scan (type1) BC2=2.524955 BC3=3.60 BC2=2.604955 BC3=3.60

  9. BC3 Scan (type2) BC2=2.524955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.524955 BC3=4.2 BC2=2.544955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.564955 BC3=4.2

  10. BC3 Scan (type2) BC2=2.524955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.524955 BC3=4.2 BC2=2.544955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.564955 BC3=4.2

  11. BC3 Scan (type2) BC2=2.564955 BC3=4.4

  12. BC3 Scan (type2) BC2=2.564955 BC3=4.4

  13. BC3 Scan (type3) BC2=2.544955 BC3=3.6 Needs more exact numerical analysis! BC2=2.584955 BC3=3.6 BC2=2.564955 BC3=3.6

  14. BC3 Scan (type4) BC2=2.524955 BC3=3.8 BC2=2.524955 BC3=4.0 BC2=2.584955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.584955 BC3=4.2

  15. BC3 Scan (type4) BC2=2.524955 BC3=3.8 BC2=2.524955 BC3=4.0 BC2=2.584955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.584955 BC3=4.2

  16. BC3 Scan (type4) BC2=2.604955 BC3=3.8 BC2=2.604955 BC3=4.0 BC2=2.604955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.604955 BC3=4.2

  17. BC3 Scan (type4) BC2=2.604955 BC3=3.8 BC2=2.604955 BC3=4.0 BC2=2.604955 BC3=4.4 BC2=2.604955 BC3=4.2

  18. Conclusion • Next Step • Increase the particle number order of million to check the microbunching instability from the numerical error • Gain calculation • In acknowledgment for guidance of Torsten Limberg, Igor Zagorodnov and all the other people of the MPY.

More Related