1 / 28

TWEPP - 11 – 26-30 September 2011 – Vienna, Austria

Low Noise Front End ASIC with Current Mode Active Cooled Termination for the Upgrade of the LHCb Calorimeter. E. Picatoste, C . Abellan, O. Duarte, L. Garrido, D. Gascon, J. Lefrançois, E. Grauges, F. Machefert, X. Vilasis Universitat de Barcelona Institut de Ciències del Cosmos ICC-UB.

lizina
Download Presentation

TWEPP - 11 – 26-30 September 2011 – Vienna, Austria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Low Noise Front End ASIC with Current Mode Active Cooled Termination for the Upgrade of the LHCb Calorimeter E. Picatoste, C. Abellan, O. Duarte, L. Garrido, D. Gascon, J. Lefrançois, E. Grauges, F. Machefert, X. Vilasis Universitat de Barcelona Institut de Ciències del Cosmos ICC-UB TWEPP-11 – 26-30 September 2011 – Vienna, Austria

  2. Outline • Introduction • Channel Architecture • First prototype • Second prototype • Summary 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  3. LHCb Upgrade • In ~5 years of data taking, most of the proposed physics program will be covered. • In order to distinguish between models of new physics, a large increase in data rate is required. • LHCb Collaboration intends to upgrade the detector during the long LHC shutdown in 2016. Muon StationsM2-M5 y Calorimeters OT RICH-1 Magnet 5m M1 IT VELO TT RICH-2 -5m 10m 0m 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  4. Current ECAL/HCAL FE LAL-Orsay • Pulse shaping in 25 ns • Residue < 1% after 25 ns • Integrator plateau : 4 ns • Linearity < 0.5% • Rise time ~ 5 ns 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 4

  5. Motivation PM current has to be reduced: Otherwise PMT would die rapidly (require a factor ~ 5) FE electronics gain has to be increased correspondingly FE noise should not be increased in the operation! New front end board is required: Low noise analog electronics GBT for data transmission @ 40MHz For 12 bit DR, input referred noise: Voltage amplifier: < 1 nV/sqrt(Hz) Current amplifier: < 10 pA/sqrt(Hz) Active cooled termination required But 2/3 of the signal are lost by clipping: Alternative solution: remove clipping at the PM base (detector) Perform clipping after amplification in FE Alternative discrete elements + delay line solution 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 5

  6. Channel Architecture Current mode amplifier Switched integrator Fully differential Op Amp Track and Hold 12 bit: flip-around architecture Analog multiplexer ADC driver To match ADC input impedance Very difficult to integrate HQ analog delay lines 2 switched alternated paths as in PS/SPD (LHCb CALO) Switching noise! Fully diferential ASAP 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 6

  7. Channel Architecture: Current Amplifier Input Stage Current mode feedback: Inner loop: lower input impedance Current feedback (gain): mirror: K Outer loop: control input impedance Current feedback: mirror: m Current gain: m Electronically cooled input impedance Current mode feedback used Optical comunications SiPMreadout Low voltage Only 1 Vbe for the super common base input stage Better in terms of ESD: No input pad connected to any transistor gate or base 2 differential outputs 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 7

  8. Channel Architecture: Switched Integrator Switched integrator Integrator plateau : 4 ns Linearity < 1% Residue < 1% after 25 ns Reset time < 5 ns • Rf to improve plateau • 100 ns time constant • Cancel slow component of the clipped signal (remanent) CMOS switches 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 8

  9. Channel Architecture: Track-And-Hold • Track-And-Hold: • 12 bit: flip-around architecture 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 9

  10. Channel Architecture: FDOA • Fully differential Op Amp: • Folded cascode + Miller stage with CMFB Folded cascode NPN CE amp RDegenertion Pole compensation Common Mode Feedback 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 10

  11. Choice of Technology • SiGe BiCMOS is preferred: • SiGe HBTs have higher gm/Ibias than MOS: less noise, less Zi variation • SiGe HBTs have higher ft (>50 GHz): easier to design high GBW amplifiers • Several technologies available: • IBM • IHP • AMS BiCMOS 0.35 um • AMS is preferred • Factor 2 or 3 cheaper • Too deep submicron CMOS not required / not wanted: • Few channels per chip (4 ?) • Smaller supply voltage • Worst matching • Radiation hardness seems to be high enough • 30 Krad seems to be OK (checked by other Upgrade projects) 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 11

  12. First prototype ICECAL chip: SiGe BiCMOS 0.35um AMS 2 mm2 Received: October 2010 12 chips Switched integrator Track and Hold • Purpose: test key points of a novel circuit idea • Input impedance control by current feedback • Low noise performance • Dynamic range: Linearity • Also, to test critical aspects of a switched solution: • Offset between subchannels • Noise • Plateau of the integrator output • Effect of the clock jitter versus signal 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 12

  13. First Prototype: Input Impedance Waveform Generator Source signal IC input signal (PCB) sbch1 Integrator clock sbch2 Reflection Coefficients for source, IC input, and output signals: Refl. Coeff. = 1st pulse integral / 2nd pulse integral 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  14. Input impedance Waveform Generator ICECAL OFF Source signal IC input signal (PCB) Large reflections sbch1 Integrator clock sbch2 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  15. Input impedance • PCB input circuit with AC coupling with Rp: • Zin a little higher than 50Ω • Rp used to fine tune Zin • Optimal Rp is between 360 and 390 Ω • Dynamic variation of input impedance is << 1 % for full dynamic (50 pC) • Measurement error for second reflection is quite high for low amplitudes (diff probe noise) • Low Refl. Coef. dispersion < 0.5% Rp 0.82±0.11% 1.99±0.21% -1.75±0.43% Rp = 390 Ohm 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  16. First Prototype: Noise • The noise: • Generate a histogram of the voltage value by the end of the cycle (from 100 waveforms). • Gaussian fit => standard deviation • Correlated Double Sampling (CDS) ↔ dynamic pedestal subtraction: • LF pick-up noise at measurements (chip connection/socket) • without CDS: 1.8 ADC counts (LF noise!) • with CDS: 1.2 ADC counts (≈1 ADC count from simulations) 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  17. First Prototype: Offset V at cycle end V offset measurement Offset measurement: Preamp current offset is integrated => Offset at output 5 % of dynamics -2ns • With AC coupling between ICECAL and ADC what really matters is the difference between the offset of the 2 subchannels • Well below the 5 % of the full scale range (2 V) 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  18. First Prototype: Linearity • Relative linearity error < 1% for the full range (2V) • Error is large for very low amplitude values • Attenuator + WaveCatcher offer better linearity than the oscilloscope but the differential probe may need calibration 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  19. Plateau at the integrator output • Due to clock jitter, the signal at the output must be stable (<1%) for 4 ns. • Input signal AWG generated similar to clipped. • Method: • Delay clock signal in 1ns increments • Use LEMO cable • The output variation is smaller than 1% for about 3 ns delay variation • Consistent for different signal amplitudes • Can be improved using a resistor in parallel to the integrator capacitor (ICECAL2) 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  20. Second prototype ICECAL2 chip: SiGe BiCMOS 0.35um AMS 2 mm2 Submitted: June 6th 2011 To be received in September Switched integrator Track and Hold • Purpose: test key points of the circuit • Input impedance control by current feedback • Low noise performance • Dynamic range: Linearity • Also, to test critical aspects of a switched solution: • Offset between subchannels • Noise • Plateau of the integrator output • Effect of the clock jitter versus signal • Integrator Rf effect 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 20

  21. Second Prototype Clock input Input signal Main signal Integrator output Tail TH output Main signal Tail 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  22. Second Prototype Simulations • Input impedance is the same as the 1st prototype • Linearity: • After TH linearity < 1% for output amplitudes < 1.8V • The linearity is limited by the output stage NMOS of the FDOA • Apply offset to the differential signal so the output voltage is reduced • The noise: • Generate a histogram of the voltage value by the end of the cycle (from 100 waveforms). • Zero input signal • Gaussian fit => standard deviation • Noise ≲ 0.8 ADC counts 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 22

  23. An integrated circuit for the Upgrade of the LHCb Calorimeter Front End electronics has been presented. Architecture based on: Current mode preamplifier with cooled termination for reduced input noise 2 fully differential interleaved channels Switched integrator Track-and-Hold Measurements of the first prototype of the input stage (preamp+integrator) are about finished Principle is ok Good results with 12 chips statistics Need to study the effect of bias (op. paint) variation A second prototype was submitted in June It includes: preamp + integrator + track-and-hold Added a feedback resistor to improve the integrator output stability Summary 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 23

  24. Back-up: 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 24

  25. Test set-up Waveform Generator signal vs. Measured clipped signal (Anatoli) Fast pulse (no tail) to measure reflections 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 25

  26. Test set-up 50Ω || 50Ω = 25Ω ⇨ emulate clipping impedance Tektronix TDS7154B Oscilloscope: • BW = 1.7 GHz • 20 GS/s • 8 bit Tektronix AWG2021 Waveform Generator: • 250 MS/s • 12 bit Differential probe: • BW = 400 MHz • Cin = 1 pF 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

  27. Test set-up: linearity • Attenuator: • Better linearity than AWG (<1%) • No need for timing corrections • WaveCatcher: • Better linearity than oscilloscope • PC: • Automatized system 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11 27

  28. Test set-up 27th September 2011 TWEPP-11

More Related