1 / 8

Study for ttH reconstruction

Study for ttH reconstruction. Work in progress…. Ricardo Gon ç alo, Pedro Teixeira-Dias, RHUL. Introduction. This is a preliminary study intended for the CSC ttH, H bb meeting (shown here due to colliding meetings, please bear with me)

lluvia
Download Presentation

Study for ttH reconstruction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Study for ttH reconstruction Work in progress… Ricardo Gonçalo, Pedro Teixeira-Dias, RHUL

  2. Introduction • This is a preliminary study intended for the CSC ttH, Hbb meeting (shown here due to colliding meetings, please bear with me) • ttH, Hbb (and ttH in general) plagued by too many combinations of b/light jets and leptons; trying to find ways of reducing this number • Concentrating on getting the right tbl combination but also looked at tbjj • Already know that what I’ll show won’t help in the likelihood analysis (see Georges Aad’s talk yesterday) but perhaps useful to someone else ATLAS Higgs WG

  3. b l W t  M(b,l) Kinematic edge • Invariant mass of the b quark and the lepton in the semileptonic top decay has a kinematic edge (thanks for D.Tovey for pointing this out) • Can this be used to improve the combinatorial background in ttH reconstruction? • Data: • ttHbl bjj bb (5341, Pythia) • ttjj (5212, MC@NLO + Herwig) • Reconstructed with 11.0.41 • EventView-based Ntuples produced by Lorenzo Feligioni and CPPM group (thanks!) t ATLAS Higgs WG

  4. M(b,l) Kinematic edge Detector effects smear distribution, but may still be useful  ATLAS Higgs WG

  5. Summary • M(b,l) variable under study for ttH reconstruction • Use limited by experimental resolution but doesn’t look too bad for tblcase • Tried M(b,j) for tbjj but resolution there is worse • May be useful in other ttH channels since these are usually plagued by large number of combinations • A few questions (and answers after discussion with CPPM group): • Correlations with other discriminant variables? • Yes, with M(bl) • Useful in multivariate methods? • Unfortunately no! (  !!!!) After combination likelihood (see G.Aad’s talk) bad combinations all have M(bl) < 160 GeV ATLAS Higgs WG

  6. Backup slides ATLAS Higgs WG

  7. M(b,j) for t bWbjj ttHbl bjj bb ttjjbl bjj jj ATLAS Higgs WG

  8. ttjjbl bjj jj ttHbl bjj bb • Positive weight selects mostly b-initiatied jets • Matching done between b quark from tbl/ tbjj and closest jet ATLAS Higgs WG

More Related