160 likes | 236 Views
Radon Mitigation using Ventilation Assessment Tool. Group 9 William Allred Joshua Chastain Daniel Diaz Ryan Nester. Introduction. Naturally occurring radioactive gas Colorless, tasteless, odorless Found all over the World Kills over 20,000 people each year (EPA).
E N D
Radon Mitigation using Ventilation Assessment Tool Group 9 William Allred Joshua Chastain Daniel Diaz Ryan Nester
Introduction • Naturally occurring radioactive gas • Colorless, tasteless, odorless • Found all over the World • Kills over 20,000 people each year (EPA) Group 9 – Department of Health
Introduction – What is the Problem? • High rise residential buildings also have Radon problems • Limited on mitigation techniques • Ventilation applicable to dilute Radon • Need methods to estimate airflow for dilution Group 9 – Department of Health
Project Scope • Develop a spreadsheet tool to evaluate the parameters necessary for successful mitigation of a single unit within a multi-family structure using ventilation techniques. • Current radon level • Target radon level • Natural leakage to outside • Ventilation rate required to reach target • Evaluation of increased load on A.C. system Group 9 – Department of Health
The Design Concept Microsoft Excel Data Validation & Formulas Determining What is Needed Group 9 – Department of Health Group 9 – Department of Health Group 9 – Department of Health 1/27/09 01/27/09
Design Concept – How it Works • Equations / Theories • Where: • Aeq = Estimated Leakage Area • P = Pressure • ρ = Density of Air • Q = Natural Ventilation Rate • V = Volume • ACH = Air Changes per Hour • C = Concentration of Radon • G = Generation rate of Radon Group 9 – Department of Health
Contaminant Equations Dilution Equation - Mass of Radon in zone i after a given time - Initial mass of Radon in zone i - Mass flow rate of Radon into zone i - Generation rate of Radon in zone i - Mass flow rate of Radon out of zone i Group 9 – Department of Health Group 9 – Department of Health 1/27/09
On-site Testing • Blower Door Fan Tests • Leakages found from Pressurization and De-Pressurization tests Group 9 – Department of Health
On-Site Testing • Smoke sticks • Pressure direction Pressurization De-Pressurization Group 9 – Department of Health
Results from On-site Testing • Documented leakage characteristics • Compared spreadsheet and actual values • Values are within 10% • Unexpected leakage sources Group 9 – Department of Health
Results for Blower Door Test Group 9 – Department of Health
Results of Blower Door Test Group 9 – Department of Health
Spreadsheet Demonstration Group 9 – Department of Health
The Future • Fine tuning • Compare results to efficiency regulations • Make more aesthetically pleasing • Write user manual Group 9 – Department of Health
Acknowledgment • Special thanks to • Florida Department of Health • Clark Eldredge • Jorge Laguna • FAMU Director of Building Sciences • Thomas Pugh • Faculty Advisor • Juan Ordoñez • Homeowners • Garmin Ranck • Daniel Montesinos • Nicholas Landera Group 9 – Department of Health
References • Design of Fluid Thermal Systems William S. Janna • NIST Multizone Modeling Website (CONTAM) http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/IAQanalysis/index.htm • Minneapolis Blower Door Operations Manual The Energy Conservatory • Walton, George. “CONTAM 2.4 User Guide and Program Documentation.” http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/IAQanalysis/docs/NISTIR_7251c.pdf Group 9 – Department of Health