250 likes | 258 Views
This study explores the neural systems underlying the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. It investigates the correlation between speech production and comprehension areas, using a novel neural coupling analysis. Results suggest the presence of coupled networks involved in speech processing.
E N D
Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech Lauren J. Silbert, Christopher K. Honet, Erez Simony, David Poeppel, and Uri Hasson Nicco Reggente & Jeff Chiang Presented for Neuroimaging+ Journal Club on Thursday December 4th by
Speech ProductionExperimental Setup / Design • 1 highly trained reference speaker (RS) • 2 Secondary Speakers (SS) • RS verbally told an autobiographical story 12 times in the scanner. • First time was “spontaneous” (previous study) • SSs told RS’s story • Control nonsense phrases “goo da gaba la la la fee foo fa” spoken by RS and SSs. • To the beat of a metronome
Speech ProductionPreprocessing • Head motions were <1mm • Rigid body alignment to first time point • Signal from “noise ROIs” in white matter and scalp were regressed out. • Physiological fluctuations + residual motion artifacts • White-matter (MPRAGE), scalp, eyeball
Speech ProductionTime-Warp Analysis • Need to temporally align each retelling Time 1 Time 2
Speech ProductionTime-Warp Analysis • Need the BOLD signal to follow Time 1 Time 2
Speech ProductionIntra-subject Correlation • Assess the reliability of the neural time courses across retellings. • TC1 correlated with mean(TC2:TCN) • Voxel-by-Voxel, exhaustively Example: motor cortex
Speech ProductionInter-subject Correlation • Same as Intra, but reference speaker compared to secondary speakers.
Phase-Randomized Bootstrapping • Used to test for significance of correlations • Generated a null distribution by generating many timeseries from the same power spectrum by varying phase
Speech Production“Spontaneous” vs. Rehearsed (Results) • Of the same story. • When comparing original story (repeated 12 times) to a new, spontaneous story… • they get no significant reliable results from intra-correlations.
Nonsense Speech ProductionIntra-subject Correlation (Results)
Speech Comprehension • 11 subjects listened to original, spontaneous story • Used TTL pulse to synchronize story and fMRI acquisition across subjects (basically each TR mapped across time across subjects) • Listened to nonsense phrases • Asked to freely recall story after the scan • These were evaluated by independent raters
Nonsense Speech ComprehensionIntra-subject Correlation (Results)
Neural Coupling procedure • GLM of the form:
Discussion • PNAS Direct Submission • Spontaneous Listening Only? • Rote/boredom effects may have drowned out true “listening” signal. • Neural Coupling of Nonsense? • Include future TR in neural coupling equation?
Discussion • They try to directly tackle the problem of “natural speech” • Alternate methods to existing ones (Phase randomized bootstrap, neural coupling) • Though they might be reinventing the wheel…
Speech ProductionIntra-SC Lateralization Index • A way to quantify reliability of a hemisphere in an exploratory analysis.
Lateralization Index • “Reliability” = average reliable responses (correlations) in ROIs. • What exactly is an average correlation?