1 / 5

MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY. – 10 AGENCIES WARE ORDERED TO RESTORE AND PRESERVE WATER QUALITY TO SB LEVEL. RULE OF PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CASES RULE 8 – Continuing mandamus against government agency or official. Unlawful neglect in performance of legal duty.

lorene
Download Presentation

MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MMDAVS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY – 10 AGENCIES WARE ORDERED TO RESTORE AND PRESERVE WATER QUALITY TO SB LEVEL.

  2. RULE OF PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CASESRULE 8 – Continuing mandamus against government agency or official • Unlawful neglect in performance of legal duty. • Unlawful exclusion from enjoyment of legal rights. • Judgment is effective until full satisfaction.

  3. FEATURES OF RULE ON CONTINUING MANDAMUS. • No docket fees. • Liberal rule on locus standi. • Filed with Court of Appeals or Supreme Court. • TEPO • Summary proceeding.

  4. FEATURES OF RULE ON CONTINUING MANDAMUS. • Case decided within 60 days. • Periodic reports required. • Execution through government agency or Commissioner. • Suitor allowed to submit comments on return writ.

  5. CONTINUING MANDAMUS • – Effective tool to ensure full execution of decision.

More Related