1 / 18

Office of Academic Technology & Division of Continuing Education University of Florida

2008 Provost E-Learning Initiative. Office of Academic Technology & Division of Continuing Education University of Florida. Produce 20 exemplary On-Line Courses by Spring 2009. Overall Goals. Improve the quality of learning Reduce the cost of instruction. Issues. Constraints:

louis-ford
Download Presentation

Office of Academic Technology & Division of Continuing Education University of Florida

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2008 Provost E-Learning Initiative Office of Academic Technology & Division of Continuing Education University of Florida

  2. Produce 20 exemplary On-Line Courses by Spring 2009

  3. Overall Goals • Improve the quality of learning • Reduce the cost of instruction

  4. Issues • Constraints: • Fully on-line • Taught over the Summer • General education requirements • Flexible offerings in high demand areas • Unmet registration demands • Lost revenue due to transfers • Ensure long term sustainability

  5. National Trends & Peers

  6. No significant difference 45% cost reduction

  7. Target Courses

  8. Transfers Lost Revenue in excess of $4,000,000

  9. Strategy • Use extrinsic and intrinsic faculty motivators • Ensure alignment with academic program • Standardize course design, development and implementation processes

  10. Request for Proposals • Puts the faculty in control • Provides a mechanism for alignment with College & Dept. • Grant program was designed to address intrinsic and extrinsic motivators

  11. Course Selection • A faculty selection committee • Selection criteria • Alignment with College and Dept. • Address the core issues of this initiative

  12. Delivery Models • High Staff/Fully Interactive Model (I/S of 1:35) • Medium Staff/Moderate Interactivity Model (I/S of 1:60) • Low Staff/Minimal Interactivity Model (I/S 1<200) Space Time

  13. Course life cycle

  14. Summer Institute

  15. Progress

  16. Evaluation • Formative • Summative • Program

  17. Discussion • Wendell A. Porter, CLAS • Jennifer, Smith, AT • Becky Williams, AT • Fedro S. Zazueta, AT

  18. Thank you!

More Related