1 / 10

Movement and Counter-Movement Courts and Political Backlash

Movement and Counter-Movement Courts and Political Backlash. Courts and Backlash. Brown v Board of Education (1954) Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Furman v. Georgia (1972) Roe v. Wade (1973). Why do Courts play such a primary role in cycles of protest and counter-protest?.

lovej
Download Presentation

Movement and Counter-Movement Courts and Political Backlash

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Movement and Counter-Movement Courts and Political Backlash

  2. Courts and Backlash • Brown v Board of Education (1954) • Miranda v. Arizona (1966) • Furman v. Georgia (1972) • Roe v. Wade (1973)

  3. Why do Courts play such a primary role in cycles of protest and counter-protest?

  4. Where are Courts in our Model of Social Movements? • Injustice • Trigger • Claim / Narrative (story) • Communication • Repertoires • Outcomes • Counter claim • Counter Movement

  5. Baer V. Miike (1993) Hawaii Supreme Court was the first to rule that excluding same-sex couples from marriage was discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1965. Spurred campaign in Hawaii to amend the state’s constitution prohibiting gay marriage (1998) Congress passes Defense of Marriage Act (1996)

  6. Baker v. Vermont (1999) Landmark case signaling the first time that court ordered a state legislature to grant same sex couples the same rights and benefits of married couples.

  7. Goodridge v. Department of Pubic Health (2003) Massachusetts Supreme Court becomes the first court in the nation to rule that gay marriage was constitutionally protected by virtue of the equl protection clause of the 14 amendment.

  8. Perry v. Schwartznegger (2008) California Supreme Court held that limiting marriage to opposite sex couples violated the California Constitution.

  9. Perry v. Schwartznegger (2008) California Supreme Court held that limiting marriage to opposite sex couples violated the California Constitution. Proposition 8 held that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

More Related