1 / 14

Manifolds optimization and pressure drops in the ATLAS TRT CO 2 cooling system

Manifolds optimization and pressure drops in the ATLAS TRT CO 2 cooling system. Joël Grognuz. Holes for p static measurements. Manifold experiment.

lperras
Download Presentation

Manifolds optimization and pressure drops in the ATLAS TRT CO 2 cooling system

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Manifolds optimization and pressure drops inthe ATLAS TRT CO2 cooling system Joël Grognuz

  2. Holes for pstatic measurements Manifold experiment • Full scale straight half manifold (2m, 40 holes for inlet, 3m, 48 holes for outlet) manufactured from aluminum U profiles with plexiglas glued on top. • For fixed Qin/out, measure pnozzle(z), and qnozzle(z) Outlet manifold mock-up Water U manometers Wisag flow-meterfor Qout ez Pump 48 holes under the rail Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  3. Manifold experiment Inlet first results: • Flux variation of 40 % • qnozzle measurements are good for pnozzle> 12mbar: • qnozzle(z) may: • be increasing • have a local minimum • be decreasing Increasing ! depending on holes sizes, Qin and friction losses. Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  4. Outlet manifold Model • Nozzle flow resistance coefficient: •  depends on the geometry of the flow at the nozzle: for inlet manifolds, the resistance increases with the flow perpendicular to the nozzle, whereas the opposite happens for outlet manifolds! Inlet manifold Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  5. Model validation (air) • Outlet ( calibrated from 2 mm diameters, Q_{in}= 25 m3h-1) • Inlet ( calibrated from 3.7 mm diameters, Q_{in}=37.5 m3h-1) q variation = 11% Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  6. Dimensioning of TRT manifolds Poiseuille flow (laminar) • Characteristics: • qnozzle(z) unlike pnozzle(z) fairly constant with varying Qin/out or . • Changes in model for CO2: • density: • kinematic viscosity: • D’Arcy friction factor (from chart for laminar and turbulent flows): • Flow resistance coefficient with zero perpendicular flux: • Manifold cross-section: 52 x 6.35 or 42 x 7 42 x 7.35 mm special setup to measure 0: Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  7. Optimized holes distributions (CO2) • Inlet (qnozzle variation = 12%) • Outlet (qnozzle variation = 24%) Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  8. Pressure drops in system (best case) Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  9. Pressure in system (best case) Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  10. Pressure drops in system (worst case) Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  11. Pressure in system (worst case) Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  12. CO2 system simulation result TRT pressure oscillations increase with valve response-time and flow/pressure: (qualitative results) Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  13. TRT wheels passive protection • Safety valve: • Valves work for p>10mbar • Placing valves upstream and downstream is not totally safe! • Rupture disc: • Space limitation problem • Accessibility if need to be changed!? 5cm Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

  14. Further work • Resurrect the cooling system simulation • Define and order components (C-wheel!?, pipe routes) • Passive safety device on wheels!? • Find a location to build prototype #2 • Build it! Manifolds optimization, Joël Grognuz

More Related