1 / 8

Monitoring & evaluation after 2013 – Concepts and ideas, sections 1+2 (concepts)

Monitoring & evaluation after 2013 – Concepts and ideas, sections 1+2 (concepts). Evaluation network MS - DG REGIO 14 th April 2011, Kai Stryczynski. Why this paper?. Wrapping up some key ideas discussed in past few years on M+E Step towards single REGIO guidance paper for 2014

lpower
Download Presentation

Monitoring & evaluation after 2013 – Concepts and ideas, sections 1+2 (concepts)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monitoring & evaluation after 2013 – Concepts and ideas, sections 1+2 (concepts) Evaluation network MS - DG REGIO 14th April 2011, Kai Stryczynski

  2. Why this paper? • Wrapping up some key ideas discussed in past few years on M+E • Step towards single REGIO guidance paper for 2014 • Time for discussion and preparation

  3. What do you want to change? • Programme priorities should clarify what they want to change - what concern is driving your intervention? • Express the precise dimension of change by a result (outcome) indicator • Clear expression of desired change is precondition for later M + E – cannot be fixed later on.

  4. How do you want to change things? • Put on paper what factors you think are likely to affect your result indicator – and how • Select the factor(s) the public programme should influence – what would the programme produce? • You have found your output indicator and described an intervention logic

  5. Monitoring: what can be observed. • Can outputs be observed? • Yes! Output monitoring. • Can changes in result indicators – driven by many factors - be observed? • Yes! Surveys, statistics, expert judgement,... • Can the share of factors contributing to the result indicator be observed? • No! Only their sum is observable.

  6. Evaluation: an inquiry into the non-observable • Distinguishing the contribution of the programme – the impact – from the effect of other factors. • Theory-based evaluations inquire the mechanisms that make a contribution of the programme happen. • Counterfactual evaluations put a number on the contribution of the programme to the change.

  7. Combine approaches and mix methods • Both types of impact evaluation answer complementary questions – so combine them. • Any inquiry delivers hints and partial answers – look at problems with different methods for a safe judgement.

  8. After and beyond this paper • Please comment on Concepts and Ideas (end of May) • Change into draft REGIO guidance paper after publication of legislative proposals (July) • EVALSED: methods for evaluation – continuing update

More Related