1 / 21

A score system study for land-use planning 土地利用規劃之評分系統研究

A score system study for land-use planning 土地利用規劃之評分系統研究. Presenter ： Song-Yi Yang Adviser ： Louis L. Tsai Date ： 2010/10/07. Outline. Introduction Objectives Literatures Reviews Methods Preliminary Results Conclusion Future Works. Introduction.

ludlow
Download Presentation

A score system study for land-use planning 土地利用規劃之評分系統研究

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A score system study for land-use planning土地利用規劃之評分系統研究 Presenter：Song-Yi Yang Adviser：Louis L. Tsai Date：2010/10/07

  2. Outline • Introduction • Objectives • Literatures Reviews • Methods • Preliminary Results • Conclusion • Future Works

  3. Introduction • Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) System (行政院環保署) Barrett et al. (2007)

  4. Introduction Leopold Matrix System (Leopold, 1971) Ai Ij

  5. Objectives To establish a score system for environmental impact assessment by using Leopold matrix. To evaluate local pollutant potential of urban and industrial area.

  6. Study Area

  7. Literatures Review Environmental impact assessment (EIA) • EIA factors includes natural、social environment、pollutions、ecology、economic、culture…, it considered by effect area Tzilivakis et al. (2005) ; Larsen et al. (2010) ; Munier (2004). • EIA Methods in Cheng (2006) mentioned that Leopold matrix can show the effect for specific factors. (Whitlatch, 1976) • Da-tan ofGuan-yin area and Jong-fu ofLu-ju area were polluted by cadmium contaminant by chemical factories (Cheng et al., 1994); it could move away by river flow (Hsu and Lo, 2000) .

  8. Data Collection Methods Area Separation EIA Factors Preliminary EIA Matrix Factor Grading Statistical Analysis Weighting of Factors EIA Matrix and Score Area Grades Results and Discussions Conclusions and Future works

  9. Methods • CF (Contamination Factors) We can assess heavy metal pollutions by pollution Index such as CF (Contamination Factors) Wang et al. (2008) ; Wu and Cao (2010)

  10. Methods PSI (Pollutant Standard Index) EPA (Air Pollution Control Act ) Cp: Concentration of pollutantp BPHi: Breakpoint concentration ≧ Cp， IHi: PSI corresponding to BPHi BPLo: Breakpoint concentration ≦ Cp， ILo: PSI corresponding to BPLo

  11. Methods RPI (River Pollutant Index) EPA (Water Pollution Control Act )

  12. Waste disposal (t/day‧person) Data of ESI for Taipei-city including waste outputs. (Lee et al., 2002) Methods

  13. Preliminary Results Monthly coastal air survey station PSI distribution

  14. Primary Results River RPI Changed by Season

  15. Preliminary Results River CF Changed by year

  16. Preliminary Results Annual waste collected by urban plan area

  17. Preliminary Results Matrix

  18. Preliminary Results

  19. Conclusion • CF, PSI, RPI and Waste disposal can be combined to assess local environmental impact. • Tsou-Ta urban area exhibits higher environmental impact; whereas Fu-gang urban area exhibits lower environmental impact.

  20. Future Works • Finding more factors for the matrix in this study. • Using statistical analysis to infer weighting of factors. • Plotting time-space distributiongraph and evaluate pollutant potential for urban and industrial areas.

  21. Thanks for your attention!!

More Related