1 / 69

Developing a low cost dish for MeerKAT

Developing a low cost dish for MeerKAT. Willem Esterhuyse Subsystem manager: Antenna Structures willem@ska.ac.za 083 447 1615. Overview. Introduction Partners Main Specs Philosophy Schedule Progress Analyses (CFD/FEA) Detail Design Manufacturing/Construction Acceptance/Verification

lysa
Download Presentation

Developing a low cost dish for MeerKAT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing a low cost dish for MeerKAT Willem Esterhuyse Subsystem manager: Antenna Structures willem@ska.ac.za 083 447 1615

  2. Overview • Introduction • Partners • Main Specs • Philosophy • Schedule • Progress • Analyses (CFD/FEA) • Detail Design • Manufacturing/Construction • Acceptance/Verification • Life after XDM (Cost optimization and KAT7 – composite dish) • Conclusion

  3. Introduction (1) • This presentation from mechanical design perspective • Antenna performance/Feeds – EMSS (LJ du Toit/ Isak Theron)

  4. Introduction (2) - XDM • 15 meter PF antenna on ALT-AZ mount with feed rotator • One-piece composite reflector that is structural • Simple back-up structure • No Panels to align • Weight saving • Concrete pedestal • Pedestal only 30% of foundation (bedrock) volume • Aim – Antenna for KAT that is relevant to SKA. • Technical/Cost • Development Subcontracted (time constraints) • IST Dynamics (PTY) LTD • Single line of responsibility (time, risk) • MMS subcontracted for dish

  5. Partners - IST • Prototype development subcontracted to IST Dynamics. Shared IP. • IST Dynamics • Prime contractor – IST exists for more than 25 years • High tech electro-mechanical systems + software • Military is biggest client • ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 • www.ist.co.za, follow link to dynamics

  6. Partners - MMS • MMS • Subcontracted by IST • Dish construction and design • Exceptional experience in Composite design and manufacture • Existing for more than 20 years • For more detail, see www.mmstechno.co.za

  7. Main Specifications and Design Goal

  8. Philosophy • Highest risk (technical and cost) – Reflector • Preferably one-piece reflector (no alignment of panels) • This requires manufacturing on site • Tooling costs very high for steel, much lower for composites • Composites attractive for smaller quantities (limited budget) • Composites offer other advantages as well • Lighter for same stiffness/strenght • On site manufacturing easy (minimal equipment required) • Better thermal performance • Going to offset antennas not significant impact on reflector • Preferably very simple backup structure (if any) – structural reflector • Pedestal – concrete (30% of foundation concrete) • Revisited in cost optimization study

  9. Schedule (KAT Antenna Structures) • XDM • Contract Signed 24 April 06 (DONE) • PDR 20 June 06 (DONE) • CDR 28 Aug 06 (DONE) • FATS 12 Feb 07 (DONE) • Installation Completed 16 May 07 (DONE) • ATP Completed 17 July 07 (DONE) • Documentation Completed 17 July 07 (DONE) • KAT7 & MeerKAT • 12m Design/Cost optimization Sept 07 – Dec07 (DONE) • KAT7 Tender Jan 07 (Progress) • KAT7 Contract award April 07 • KAT7 Array Completed Nov 09 • MeerKAT Contract award Jan 2010 • MeerKAT Array Completed Nov 2012

  10. ANALYSES - CFD • Detailed CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) analyses to determine pressures on dish as result of wind loading (for use in FEA analyses) • Results compared to published results – good correlation • Results compared with limited experimental data – good correlation

  11. Analyses – FEA – Modes Mode 1: 4.2 Hz side to side Mode 2: 4.4 Hz dish “flaps” Mode 3: 4.7 Hz nodding

  12. Analyses – FEA - displacements

  13. Detail Design/Manufacture - Dish • Very simple backup structure • Dish is structural (approx. 5 Tons) • Symmetric, to eliminate curing distortions • Manufacturing (see pictures later): • Machine patterns (composite pattern material) • Make composite moulds of the patterns • Combine composite moulds to create dish mould • Innovative and cheap honeycomb structure (off the shelf honeycomb cores very expensive). • Vacuum Infusion process used for molding entire dish as a unit

  14. Detail Design/Manufacture - Dish Typical dish lay-up

  15. Detail Design – Drives/Controls • Azimuth axis • 1 spring - loaded drive • 2 deg/s, 460 degree travel • Elevation axis • 1 spring - loaded drive • 1 deg/s, 0 to 95 degree elevation range • Elevation axis is BALANCED • Light dish (composites) makes this possible with minimal use of counter weights • Feed rotator axis • 380 degree travel

  16. Verification/Acceptance • Completed • Achieved all design goals • Dish tested at 1.42 and 12 GHz • Dish accuracy around 1.7mm RMS • (Confirmed with Theodolite and Photogrammetry measurements) • Improve? – pattern from Al, mold. • Al Flame sprayed surface works well • Pointing – 25 arcsec RMS (optically) • Improve? – probably 2 drives • Thermal performance – thermocouples molded into dish front and rear to verify analyses assumptions.

More Related