1 / 30

Kentucky Department of Education

Assessment update Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and Research Office Of Assessment And Accountability rhonda.sims@education.ky.gov 502-564-4394. Kentucky Department of Education. September 24, 2013. What We’ll be Covering. Timeline for 2013 Reporting

macey-vaughan
Download Presentation

Kentucky Department of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment update Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and ResearchOffice Of Assessment And Accountability rhonda.sims@education.ky.gov502-564-4394 Kentucky Department of Education September 24, 2013

  2. What We’ll be Covering • Timeline for 2013 Reporting • What’s included in the School Report Card (SRC)? • Year 2 SRC Review • Classifications and Labels (Rewards/Assistance) • Delivery • Program Reviews

  3. Timeline for 2013 Reporting August Schools received data Quality Review 9 a.m. ET -- Release of embargoed data to districts via the School Report Card 1 p.m. ET -- Release of embargoeddata to media Wed.Sept. 25 Fri.Sept. 27 12:01 a.m. ET – Embargo liftedPublic release of School Report Card ThroughOct. 7 Data Review for (10 days)

  4. What’s Included in the School Report Card? School/District/State Data • Profiles • Assessment Results • Accountability Classifications • Federal Accountability/AMO • Learning Environment –non-academic data • membership • per pupil spending • student demographics • free/reduced-meal • school safety • Delivery Targets • attendance rate • retention rate • dropout rate • graduation rate

  5. Assessment Data • K-PREP (Kentucky Performance Rating for Educational Progress) -- Grades 3-8 • Scores and performance levels (NAPD) • Reading • Mathematics • Science • EXPLORE, PLAN, ACT (Grades 8, 10, 11) • Scores and benchmarks • End-of-Course • English II • Algebra II • Writing (Grades 5, 6, 8, 10-11) • Editing/mechanics (Grades 4, 6, 10 (Plan)) • Social Studies • Writing/mechanics • Biology • U.S. History

  6. Accountability Data • Next-Generation Learners • Achievement • Gap • Growth • Accountability classifications • Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) • Participation Rate and Graduation Rate • Rewards/Assistance • Graduation Rate • College/career-readiness

  7. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  8. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  9. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  10. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  11. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  12. College/Career-Readiness Rate

  13. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  14. Graduation Rate Reminder • Cohort model graduation data is used in the 2012-13 calculation for the Graduation Rate component (20% of high school Next-Generation Learners). • Averaged Freshman Graduation Rate (AFGR) will be used one last time in 2012-13 for graduation rate goals. • Cohort will be used for graduation rate goals moving forward (i.e., 2013-14).

  15. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  16. Accountability: Year 2 SRC Review Simulated data shown

  17. Accountability: Year 2 Classifications and Labels • Needs Improvement (Below 70th Percentile) • Proficient (At or Above 70th Percentile) • Distinguished (Above 90th Percentile) • ProgressingNEW 2013 • Meet Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) goal (1.0 gain in Overall Score below Proficient or .5 gain Proficient and above); • Graduation rate goal (AFGR); and • Participation rate (95%)

  18. Accountability: Year 2Rewards Categories • High Performing School • Top 90% of schools and meets AMO, graduation rate goal and participation rate goal • School of Distinction • Top 95% of schools and meets AMO, graduation rate goal, participation rate goal and has graduation rate above 60% for 2 years • High-ProgressNEW 2013 • Top 10% of improvement and • Meet AMO, graduation rate goal (AFGR) and participation rate (95%) Any other school label can also be labeled High-Progress

  19. Accountability: Year 2 Assistance Categories • Priority (No new Priority Schools added in 2012-13) • Focus (No new Focus Schools added in 2012-13, but new Districts may be added) • Lowest 10% in Overall Gap Group or meets third standard deviation model for a single gap group

  20. Accountability: Year 2Locked Proficient & Distinguished Percentiles Percentiles for Elementary, Middle and High Overall Score were set and locked in 2011-12. The locked percentile serves as the overall score target for 2013 reporting. 70th90th95th Elementary Overall Score 62.5 69.8 72.5 Middle Overall Score 58.7 64.9 68.2 High Overall Score 58.0 64.4 67.7 District Overall Score 58.4 63.3 65.2

  21. School Report Card Year Two Format Changes • Add Trend Data for Profiles • Update Graduation Data to show both Cohort & AFGR • Add Trend Data for NAPD Tables • Add Non-Duplicated Gap Group to list of individual group scores • Add Total Students with Disability (regular and alternate assessments) • Add Level-Based (elementary, middle and high) data for disaggregated pages • Clarify language and footnotes

  22. Delivery sets yearly targets based upon a 5-year goal to help schools/districts meet state achievement expectations Simulated data shown

  23. Program Review (PR) Data Release • Tentative Release of School and District Data • Date: October 2013 • Provided through Open House on KDE website • Based on Program Review scores that schools and districts entered into ASSIST • Scores generated using the Program Review scoring guides/rubrics • For accountability, new set of combined goals for 2014 • Date: November 2013

  24. Program Review (PR) Scoring Guide

  25. Program Review Calculations Each of the 3 Program Review areas (Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living) is comprised of 4 standards (Curriculum/Instruction, Formative/Summative Assessment, Professional Development, and Administrative Support). Step 1: Average the characteristic scores for a score for each standard. • Scores range from 0-3 for each standard • 0–No Implementation, 1–Needs Improvement, 2–Proficient, and 3–Distinguished Step 2: Add the 4 standard scores to get a single number for each Program Review area. • Scores range 0-12 for each Program Review area • The cut score 8 is Proficient and 10.8 is Distinguished Step 3: Add the three Program Review area scores for a total Program Review score. • Scores range between 0-36 Step 4: Divide the total number by 24 (proficient (8) x 3 areas = 24). • This number yields the percent of the 23 points earned (number of points possible in Unbridled Learning accountability model for PR when Learners and PR are combined).

  26. Program Review Data Release Calculation Example

  27. Program Review Data Release Combining Next-Generation Learners and Program Review *Combined Overall Score used to calculate new 70th and 90th percentile cut for summer 2014 targets

  28. Important Resources • KDE website: www.education.ky.gov

  29. Important Resources

  30. Assessment update Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and ResearchOffice Of Assessment And Accountability rhonda.sims@education.ky.gov502-564-4394 Kentucky Department of Education September 24, 2013

More Related