200 likes | 311 Views
A review of atmospheric 10 Be in Dry Valley soils. Warren Dickinson, Martin Schiller Ian Graham, Bob Ditchburn, and Albert Zondervan. Beryllium. Metal ion: soluble in low pH; insoluble in hi pH 9-Be Stable isotope (ug/g) Trace element in rx (weathering)
E N D
A review of atmospheric 10Be in Dry Valley soils Warren Dickinson, Martin Schiller Ian Graham, Bob Ditchburn, and Albert Zondervan
Beryllium Metal ion: soluble in low pH; insoluble in hi pH 9-Be Stable isotope (ug/g) Trace element in rx (weathering) 10-Be Cosmogenic isotope (atoms/g) Atmospheric Half life = 1.5 Ma (15 Ma max age) Attaches to atm. particles and falls out Wet (snow/ice) in low & mid latitudes Dry (dust) in high latitudes
Dating Soils with 10-Be Open System: Total inventory of 10-Be Assume no loss of 10-Be through erosion Must know/assume input & output rate or residence time Closed System: 10-Be becomes fixed in authigenic soil mineral Use of 10Be/9Be avoids knowing input/output rates
Dating with Atm. – Derieved 10Be (closed system) 1) 10Be produced in upper atm. 2) Falls via dust & moisture 3) Accum. in salts & particles 4) 9Be (stable) from silicate weathering 5) Assume:10Be/9Be = fixed at surface & locked into alteration minerals 6) Age of mineral related to 10Be decay in authigenic mineral
Wright Vly Beacon Heights Roberts Massif Table Mtn.
9Be (ppm) 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 0 0 0.5 1 Depth (metres) 1.5 2 2.5 >62 microns <62 microns 3 Example from Sirius Group, Table Mt
10Be/9Be 10-11 10-10 10-09 10-7 10-8 0 0.5 1 1.5 >62 microns Depth (metres) <62 microns 2 2.5 3 Example from Sirius Group, Table Mt
10Be (atoms/g) 105 106 107 108 109 0 0.5 1 Depth (metres) 1.5 >62 microns <62 microns 2 2.5 3 Example from Sirius Group, Table Mt 11.5 Ma depending on ‘background’ 10-Be
Conclusions from closed system model of dating Antarctic soils: • Reasonable ages obtained • Nagging problems: - Migration of 10Be in hi pH soils - 9Be and 10Be from different sources and probably not mixed esp. in dry alkaline soils - Little diff. in 10Be/ 9Be ratio compared to 10Be • Needed an independent test of age
For test: Used a soil on the Hart Ash (3.9 Ma) Wright Valley
Hart Ash Profile H5 Spls (cm) 1,4,5,7,9,10,11,15, 15,20,30,50,70.
Salts: Conc. in fine grained, porous and perm. ash Mostly Na-Cl from sea (sw dilution line) No salt in paleosol (may have migrated upward in to ash
9Be: 1) Conc in volcanic ash rather than doloritic soil Corr. to dissolution of material that contains Be 3) 9Be cannot be used to normalize 10Be
10Be: 1) None in ash No migration of Be from surface thru ash 3) 10Be mobility nil in alkaline soil
Why so little 10-Be in the upper part of the soil? Erosion? Not likely with in situ ash. Alternatives: 2) 10-Be input rate is very low 3) 10-Be not incorporated into soil (same effect as #2) Using age of ash and amount of 10-Be in paleosol: Input rate 3.9Ma was higher than present Possible that most 10-Be blows away under current dry conditions.
Where we think we are now Atm 10-Be cannot be used to date Dry Valley soil surfaces by closed or open system models 2) Still not clear how 10-Be gets into Dry Valley soils, but need for wetter, vegetated conditions may be necessary 3) Be may help in understanding past environmental conditions.
10-Be Surface Concentrations in the Dry Valleys Taylor Dome Input Bulk Input
Dating with Atm. – Derieved 10Be (closed system) Advantages: 1) Independent of 10Be deposition rate 2) Seemed to give good ages Problems: 1) Be somehow transported downward 2) 10/9 must be totally mixed but they come from different sources 3) 9Be increases with silicate weathering Needed to find an independent test of age