1 / 52

Design of Bio-Chips from Theory and Multiscale Simulation

Design of Bio-Chips from Theory and Multiscale Simulation. Prominent Technologies. DNA and Peptide/protein. DNA & Protein Microarrays are useful for a variety of tasks. Genetic analysis Disease detection Synthetic Biology Computing. What tools are required?. $1000 Genome at birth

mae
Download Presentation

Design of Bio-Chips from Theory and Multiscale Simulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design of Bio-Chips from Theoryand MultiscaleSimulation

  2. Prominent Technologies DNA and Peptide/protein

  3. DNA & Protein Microarraysare useful for a variety of tasks • Genetic analysis • Disease detection • Synthetic Biology • Computing

  4. What tools are required? • $1000 Genome at birth • $100 Diagnostic exam • Proteome at birth? • Universal standards

  5. Cross platform comparisons Controls Validation Data bases for comparisons Nearly impossible due differences in the physics and chemistry at the surface Problems in Surface Mounted technologies: Microarrays, Next-gen …

  6. Binding (recognition) is different in the presence of a surface than in homogeneous solution. The surface determines: Polarization fields Ionic screening layers Ultimately: Device response A Central Theoretical Issue:

  7. T - - G A - C - - - - C - - G G G T C - A A - T - - - Salt Water - - - - - - - - - - - - Targets - GC - TA - - - - - AT - - - - - 5nm - - - - CG - Probes - - - - - - - GC - - - - - AT - Prepared Hard Surface

  8. Materials, Preparation and Size Matter • DNA prep 10nm 100nm 10 μm to bulk solid

  9. What length scales are required? • Solid Substrate Roughness • Linkers • Surface Probes • Targets • Solution Correlations

  10. Chemistry Na Cl .1 to .8 M Probe Target

  11. Simulations and Theories of Bio Chips Set up must include • Substrate (Au, Si, SiO2 …) • Electrostatic fields • Surface modifications • Spacers (organic) • Probe and Target Bio (DNA or peptide) strands • Salt and lots of Water • Force field, … Wong & Pettitt CPL 326, 193 (2000) Wong & Pettitt TCA 106, 233 (2001) Wong & Pettitt Biopoly 73, 570 (2004) Pettitt, Vainrub, Wong NATO ASI (2005) Qamhieh, Wong Lynch Pettitt IJNAM (2009)

  12. Simulate a simple classical force field Model the interactions between atoms • Bonds - 2 body term • harmonic, Hooke's law spring • Angles -3 body term • Dihedrals -4 body term Source: http://www.ch.embnet.org/MD_tutorial/

  13. Nonbonded Terms • 2 body terms • van der Waals (short range) & Coulomb (long range) • Coulomb interaction consumes > 90% computing time Ewald Sum electrostatics to mimic condensed phase screening • Periodic Boundary Conditions Electrostatic Forces Dominate Behavior

  14. F = ma or With a classical Molecular Mechanics potential, V(r) These potentials have only numerical solutions. t must be small, 10-15s

  15. Correlations • Neither Vertical nor Flat on surface (tilt) • Nonuniform Structures • Linker/spacer effects Wong & Pettitt CPL 326, 193 (2000) Wong & Pettitt TCA 106, 233 (2001)

  16. Implications • Colloidal behavior affects • synthesis / fabrication • and binding • Tilt restricts possible geometries of pairing • Affinity and specificity G & G

  17. – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± Forces: Surface and Solution Water +[salt] ± ± Substrate ± ± ±

  18. Theory Calculate the free energy difference of hybridization between that in solution and on a surface Gsol-hybrid -Gsur-hybrid= Gss-att-Gdup-att Gsol-hybrid Target + Probe Target : Probe Gdup-attach Gss-attach Gsur-hybrid Target :Probe:Surface Target + Probe:Surface

  19. Theory To get the work to form a single duplex on the surface we need: • ΔGsolwhich we can take from thermodynamic tables: solution reference state (John Santa-Lucia). • ΔGatt from a consideration of the surface effects (chemistry and physics)

  20. Coarse graining DNA electrostatic field(Poisson-Boltzmann) J. Ambia-Garrido Vainrub, Pettitt, Chem. Phys. Lett. 323 160 (2000) Ambia-Garrido, Pettitt, Comp Phys Com 3, 1117 (2008)

  21. The ions and water penetrate the grooves. Na+ Cl- H2O Feig & Pettitt BJ 77, 1769 (1999)

  22. A Simple Model • Ion permeable, 20 Å sphere over a plane/surface • 8 bp in aqueous saline solution over a surface • Linear Poisson-Boltzmann has an analytic solution h DNA - Vainrub and Pettitt, CPL ’00 Ellipse - Garrido and Pettitt, CPC, 08

  23. The shift of the dissociation free energy or temperature for an immobilized 8 base pair oligonucleotide duplex at 0.01M NaCl as a function of the distance from a charged dielectric surface q=0 or  0.36e-/nm2 linker Vainrub and Pettitt, CPL ’00 Vainrub and Pettitt, Biopoly ’03

  24. Surface at a constant potential for a metal coated substrate @ .01 M NaCl Vainrub and Pettitt, CPL ’00 Vainrub and Pettitt, Biopoly ’03

  25. Response to E-fields Salt and Substrate Material Effects on 8-bp DNA Vainrub & Pettitt, Biopoly 2004

  26. Finite Concentration and Coverage 2f = k2f outside the sphere and plane, 2f = k2f - (r/ee0) inside the sphere, f|r =a+ = f|r =a- , r f|r =a+ = rf|r =a- on the sphere, f|z =0+ = f|r =0- , z f|z =0+ - rf|z =0- = -s/ee0 on the plane. Different from O & K h Vainrub and Pettitt, Biopolymers 2003 Vainrub & Pettitt et al , NATO Sci , 2005

  27. Coulomb Blockage Dominates Optimum DNA spacing Langmuir High negative charge density repels target surface binding On Chip Binding Target Conc hybridization efficiency θ (0 θ1) target concentration C0 Vainrub &Pettitt, PRE (2002) Vainrub &Pettitt, JACS (2003) Probe surface density

  28. Experimental Isotherm for perfectly matched lengths Explains some experiments: • Low on-array hybridization efficiency on glass (Guo et al 1994, Shchepinov et al 1995) • Broadening and down-temperature shift of melting curve (Forman et al 1998, Lu et al 2002) • Surface probe density effects (Peterson et al 2001, Steel et al 1998, Watterson 2000)

  29. Melting curve temperature and widthAnalytic wrt surface probe density (coverage) W+ DW W In solution Tm = DH0/ (DS0 – R ln C) W = 4RTm2/DH0 On-array: Isotherms *1012 nP probes/cm2 dA20 /dT20 duplex Tm - DTm Tm Critical for SNP detection design Pettitt et al NATO Sci 206, 381 (2005)

  30. Strength and linearity of hybridization signal x1012 Vainrub and Pettitt JACS (2003); ibid Biopolymers, (2004)

  31. Peak of sensitivity Vainrub and Pettitt, JACS (2003)

  32. Linear range of hybridization Non-linear error is below Beyond the linear range use the on-array binding isotherm

  33. Probe vs. Target lengths often mismatch in various ways . . . vs.

  34. Longer sequences are the expected and require true mesoscale models Perfect pairing Pairing w/ an overhang Garrido Vainrub &Pettitt CPC ‘10

  35. To Accommodate Longer Sequences and Secondary Structure Near a Surface

  36. Mesoscale: Allow for variations inLinker chemistryOver-hangUnder-hangon probesand targetsin all combinations.Parameterize ssDNAas well as dsDNA. Garrido Vainrub &Pettitt JPCM submitted

  37. DNA Entropic contributions • Sample with Monte-Carlo • via Meirovitch (hypothetical scan) • via Quasi Harmonic • Correlations of sequence mismatch with physical corrections • Data mining for equilibrium thermodynamics

  38. ΔG

  39. ΔG

  40. Information vs efficiency • ssDNA has the same spatial average as dsDNA but not fluctuations. • Longer strands have more information 4n. • Kinetic problem • Shorter strands pair more efficiently. • Kinetic balance

  41. High Salt is Far Beyond Analytic PB (Mean Field) Electrostatics Gouy-Chapman ~1910 Double layer at charged interfaces. How good is this? Add all the atoms via integral equations in 3D (renorm.- HNC)

  42. Solvent and ion charge densities MF-PB HNC-IE H2O ε=80 w/ Ions

  43. Charge-Charge correlations • Multi Layer effects not Bilayer • Dominate at interfaces • Determine the thermodynamics • Change the kinetics

  44. To design for Affinity and Specificity Coverage and Surface effects • Use Electric fields • Effects of DNA with poly cations • Use surface effects • Layered hard materials • Use quantitative theories • Explicit polymer entropy • Non m.f. coverage and electrostatics

More Related