1 / 24

Hyperon Suppression in Hadron-Quark Mixed Phase T. Maruyama (JAEA) , S. Chiba (JAEA) ,

Hyperon Suppression in Hadron-Quark Mixed Phase T. Maruyama (JAEA) , S. Chiba (JAEA) , H.-J. Schhulze (INFN-Catania) , T. Tatsumi (Kyoto U. ). Property of nuclear matter in neutron stars. Non uniform “Pasta” structures at first-order phase transitions and the EOS of mixed phase.

maegan
Download Presentation

Hyperon Suppression in Hadron-Quark Mixed Phase T. Maruyama (JAEA) , S. Chiba (JAEA) ,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hyperon Suppression in Hadron-Quark Mixed Phase T. Maruyama (JAEA) , S. Chiba (JAEA), H.-J. Schhulze (INFN-Catania), T. Tatsumi (Kyoto U.) • Property of nuclear matter in neutron stars. • Non uniform “Pasta” structures at first-order phase transitions and the EOS of mixed phase. • Structure and mass of neutron stars. • Particle fraction in mixed phase -- hyperon suppression.

  2. Observed Neutron Star Masses • Most of them lie around 1.4 Msol Hulse-Taylor Radius ~ 10 km Central density ~ several r0—10 r0 Mass ~ 1.4 Msol

  3. At 2-3 r0,hyperons are expected to emerge in nuclear matter.  Large softening of the EOS  Maximum mass of neutron star becomesless than 1.4 solar mass.  Contradicts obs. >1.4 Msol Without Y With Y Schulze et al, PRC73 (2006) 058801

  4. Phase transition to quark matter may solve this problem.[Maieron et al, PRD70 (2004) 043010 etc]. • But the existence of mixed phasemay soften the EOS again! • --- Bulk Gibbs calculation yields wide range of mixed phase and large softening [Glendenning, PRD46,1274]. Maxwell construction EOS of mixed phase is important !

  5. In the mixed phase with charged particles, non-uniform ``Pasta’’ structures are expected [Ravenhall et al, PRL 50 (1983) 2066]. Depending on the density, geometrical structure of mixed phase changes from droplet, rod, slab, tube and to bubble configuration. Quite different from abulk picture of mixed phase. We have to take into account the effect of the structure when we calculate EOS. Surface tension & Coulomb

  6. Assume regularity in structure: divide whole space into equivalent and neutral cells with a geometrical symmetry • (3D: sphere, 2D : cylinder, 1D: plate). Wigner-Seitz cell approx. • Divide a cell into hadron phase and quark phases. • Give a geometry (Unif/Dropl/Rod/...) and a baryon density rB. • Solve the field equations numerically. Optimize the cell size and H-Q boundary position (choose the energy-minimum). • Choose an energy-minimum geometry among 7 cases • (Unif H, droplet, rod, slab, tube, bubble, Unif Q). Hadron-Quark mixed-phase structure and EOS (T=0) WS-cell 6

  7. to get density profile, energy, pressure, etc of the system Coupled equations Chemical equilibrium fully consistent with all the density distributions and potentials.

  8. Hadron EOS vs quark EOS--- Choice of parameters For hadron phase, there is no adjustable parameter in the BHF model. For quark phase, we chooseaS =0 and B=100 MeV/fm3. Quark threshold is above the hyperon threshold in uniform matter. Critical density Hyperon threshold 0.34 fm-3

  9. Density profile in a cell ri(r) consistent with Ui(r) Quark phase is negatively charged.  u quarks are attracted and d,s quarks repelled. Same thing happens to p in the hadron phase.

  10. EOS of matter Full calculation (with pasta) is close to the Maxwell construction (local charge neutral). Far from the bulk Gibbs calculation (neglects the surface and Coulomb).

  11. Structure of compact stars Solve TOV eq. Density at r Pressure ( input of TOV eq.) Mass inside r Full calc tsurf=40 MeV/fm2 Bulk Gibbs Maxwell const. Density profile of a compact star (M=1.4 solar mass) Total mass and Radius

  12. Mass-Radius relation of compact stars Full calc yields the neutron star mass very close to that of the Maxwell constr. The maximum mass are not very different for three cases. tsurf=40

  13. Important Side-effect of Pasta Structure Full calculation Particle fraction Although the EOS of matter and NS mass by the full calc is close to the Maxwell constr., the particle fraction is much different. Hyperon does not appear. ru ~ rs  2SC?

  14. Neutral hadron matter (positively) Charged hadron matter Hyperon suppression Pasta  Local charge. Without charge-neutrality condition, hyperons appear at higher density. Neutral hadron th=0.34 fm Hyperon mixture is favoured to reduce electron and neutron Fermi energy. Charged hadron th=1.15 fm Heavy hyperons are not favoured. particle fraction particle fraction Mixed phase consists of negative Q and positive H phases. Hyperon suppression 14

  15. Summary • We have studied ``Pasta’’ structures of hadron-quark mixed phase. • Coulomb screening and stronger surface tension makes the EOS of mixed phase close to that of Maxwell construction instead of a bulk Gibbs calc. • The mass-radius relation of a compact star is also close to the Maxwell construction case. • But the particle fraction and the inner structure is quite different. Non uniform structure causes local charge and consequently the suppression of hyperons. • All the strangeness in NS is in the quark phase. • If the mixture of hyperons is suppressed in neutron stars •  influence on thermal property and n opacity (cooling process).

  16. R and s dependence of E/A. Strong tsurflarge R Weak Coulomblarge R

  17. Maxwell construction: • Assumes local charge neutrality (violates the Gibbs cond.) • Neglects surface tension. • Bulk Gibbs calculation: • Respects the balances of mi between 2 phases but neglects surface tension and the Coulomb interaction. • Full calculation: includes everything. • Strong tsurf LargeR, • charge-screening effectively • local charge neutral. •  close to the Maxwell constrctn. • Weak tsurf  Small R  Coulomb ineffective •  close to the bulk Gibbs calc.

  18. Energy density of Hadron phase Brueckner Hartree Fock model YN scatt data, L-nuclear levels, and nuclear saturation are fitted.

  19. Energy density of Quark phase MIT bag model Electron fraction is very small in quark matter.

  20. Phase transitions in nuclear matter Liquid-gas, neutron drip, meson condensation, hyperon, hadron-quark, color super-conductivity etc. EOS of mixed phase in first order phase transition • Many components • (e.g. water+ethanol) • Gibbs cond. TI=TII, PiI=PiII, miI=miII. • No Maxwell const ! • Single component(e.g.water) • Maxwell const. satisfies • Gibbs cond. TI=TII, PI=PII, mI=mII. • Many charged components • Gibbs cond. TI=TII, miI=miII. • No Maxwell const ! • No constant P !

  21. Pure Hadron (Hyperon) Nicotra et al astro-ph/0506066 Hadron+Quark Maxwell constr. astro-h/0608021

More Related