230 likes | 334 Views
Solo terrorists and the threat they represent. Research fellow / senior advisor Cato Hemmingby Norwegian Police University College / Norwegian Government Security and Service Organization. Conducted attacks in W-Europe 1991-2013. Cato Hemmingby 2013. Lethality.
E N D
Solo terrorists and the threat they represent Research fellow / senior advisor Cato Hemmingby Norwegian Police University College / Norwegian Government Security and Service Organization
Conductedattacks in W-Europe 1991-2013 Cato Hemmingby 2013
Lethality • A few individualsconducted many attacks, but many attacks do not necessarily mean many people killed. • Limited lethality: • 14 perpertratorskilled 91 persons in 94 attacks: 0,968 • ABB ex.: 13 perp. killed 14 persons in 92 attacks: 0,152 • Oneincident may have great impact on statistics. • Attacks where a numberofpeoplegetkilledoccur from time to time. .
Solo terrorists as a challenge Solo terrorists represent a constant, butveryunclear and unpredictablethreat. • The onlycertainthing is that it willhappenagain. • Probablythe most difficult terrorist threatto detect. • Police and security services are in many cases dependingonthe first indication from theoutside- typically from theperson’sclosesurroundings. .
Plots and attacks in Scandinavia 2008-2013 Cato Hemmingby 2014
Scandinavia 2008-13, not detected in time Cato Hemmingby 2014
Scandinavia 2008-13, ”successful” Cato Hemmingby 2014
Conclusion from Scandinavia 2008-2013 • Thirteen plots and attacks in all. • All sevengroup plots disrupted, none loneattackersdetected. • The onlyones «successful» wereMangs and Breivik - the pure solo terrorists. Also: • Eightoutofthirteen plots and attacksweredirectlylinked to Mohammed cartoons. • Only one attack was of an indiscriminate nature.
How advanced do solo terrorists operate? Photo: Cato Hemmingby
Innovative, creative and sophisticated • Innovation: Featuringnewmethods or original ideas so there is a change to somethingestablished. • Creative: Relating to or involvingimagination or original ideas in order to create or achievesomething. • Sophisticated: Awareof and able to interpret complexissues.
How to measurethis? Cato Hemmingby 2013
Conductedattacks in W-Europe 1991-2013 Cato Hemmingby 2013
Not innovative, oftensophisticatedenough • Solo terrorists are not innovative. • A fewarecreative and sophisticated to a lowdegree, most areon an intermediateleveland veryfewareon a highlevel. • A certaindegreeofsophistication is enough. • Theytend to do some smart things, but most also do elementarymistakes.
PETER MANGS – The Malmö shooter • Right-wingideology • A numberofattacks in 2003, 2009 and 2010 • Targeted immigrants • Convicted for twomurders and eightattemptedmurders.
Background and targetinglogic • Background: • Somepsychologicalissues. • Averageperformance in primary and secondaryschool. • No militaryservice. Expressedinterest for the Home Guard. • Interests: Music, taekwondo and pistol shooting. • Former Left Party member. • Targetinglogic: • Immigrants • Criminals
Weaponsand methodofattack • LicensedGlock 9mm, two x-trabarrels++ • Combat vest and disguises • Close quarter attacks • Shooting at buildings Photo: Swedishpolice
Pre-attackconduct • Smart set-up withextraGlock pistol barrels. • Lots ofmapping and researchonInternet. • Retrievedinformation from courtdocuments. • Poorreconnaissance. Shotintowrongapartmentsontwooccasions. On severaloccasionshelooked up theresidenceof a man whowas in prison.
Executionofattack • Used cartridgeshellcollector. • Leftcartridgeshells from otherweaponsonthe scene. • Leftcartridgeshells in other spots thanthe firing position. • However, hedid not always do a goodjobof it. Photo: Swedishpolice
Post-attackconduct • False tip-offcall to police in 2003. • He talkedaboutattacksto a fewfriends. • Incriminating data oncomputers and phones. • Twoitemsfrom themurder in 2003 found in 2010. • He didnot hideweaponparts and equipmentwell. .
Timeline and patterns • Shotboth men and women. • Operated in a limited area. • No attacks in theperiod from 2004 to 2008. • High frequency in 2009/2010. • Targetedbothonchance and by choice. • Attempted some individuals more than once. • On two occasions he conducted two attacks within hours. .
SummaryonMangs • Rathertypicalbackground. • Close surroundingsknewof his extremistviews. • Creative set-up with two unlicensed barrels. • Variable performance as heexecutedattacks. • It waseasy to link him to a series ofattackswhensuspicion first wasraised.
Conclusion • In general, solo terrorism is a low-frequency and low-lethalityphenomenon. • From time to time, single incidentstakemany lives. • Solo terrorists arevery hard to detect. • Most display creativity and sophisticationon an intermediatelevel, but most also do basicmistakes. Solo terrorists willcontinue to representa constant, butveryunclearand unpredictablethreat.
Research fellow Cato Hemmingby Email: cathem@phs.no