240 likes | 411 Views
Recent Progress in ASON Technologies in the OIF. Joe Berthold President – Optical Internetworking Forum. Outline. OIF Overview Control Plane Interoperability Demonstrations Current Work and Future Directions. About OIF.
E N D
Recent Progress in ASON Technologies in the OIF Joe Berthold President – Optical Internetworking Forum
Outline • OIF Overview • Control Plane Interoperability Demonstrations • Current Work and Future Directions
About OIF • Launched in April of 1998 with an objective to foster development of low-cost and scaleable internet using optical technologies • The only industry group bringing together professionals from the data and optical worlds • Open forum: 100+ member companies • International • Carriers • Component and systems vendors • Testing and software companies • Our MissionTo foster the development and deployment of interoperable products and services for data switching and routing using optical networking technologies
Domain A Domain B Domain C Client Client OIF E-NNI OIF E-NNI OIF UNI OIF UNI NE NE NE NE NE NE Output from OIF – Implementation Agreements • 35 agreements published to date • Applications include: • Control plane interfaces User-to-Network (UNI), Network-to-Network (NNI), Security & Billing • Intra-office Optical interfaces Very Short Reach (VSR) 10Gbps & 40 Gbps • Tunable Lasers Assembly and Control • Intra-system Electrical interfaces Serializer/Deserializer-Framer interface (SFI), Physical-Link Layer device interfaces(SPI), Fabric-to-Framer interface Link Layer Link Layer SER SER E/O E/O Framer Framer (Packet & (Packet & DES DES Tx Tx Cell Protocols) Cell Protocols) SPI SPI SFI SFI VSR VSR
Domain A Domain B Domain C Client Client OIF E-NNI OIF E-NNI OIF UNI OIF UNI NE NE NE NE NE NE Optical Control Plane – The Overall Benefits Routing Discovery Signaling • Technology Benefits Service activation Multi-layer resource control Resiliency mechanisms • Topology discovery • Path Selection Resource discovery Inventory management Control channel management
Carriers Interoperability Tests/Demonstrations Deployment Interop WG Interoperability Agreements Networking WGs Requirements Carrier WG Feedback Evolution from Requirements to Deployment
OIF Interactions with other bodies • IETF • Frequent informal liaisons on protocol issues and activities • Example: Ethernet traffic specifications • Security Aspects • ITU-T • Liaisons for exchange of documents, issue identification • Cooperative discussion on ASON-related Demos and Implementation Agreements • MEF • Recent liaisons on Ethernet-related work • Support of MEF Ethernet service characteristics in OIF UNI 2.0
Outline • OIF Overview • Control Plane Interoperability Demonstrations • Current Work and Future Directions
2005 - Second Worldwide Demonstration • World's leading optical technology carriers and suppliers • 7 carriers and 13 vendors invested significant time and resources to complete the demonstration • Collaborating to build a global optical network delivering Ethernet services • Global Reach • 3 Continents, 6 Countries • Trans-Atlantic, Trans-Pacific network connection set-up
SuperComm 2005 booth OIF Interoperability Labs Lannion, France Waltham, MA-USA Beijing, China Berlin, Germany Middletown, NJ-USA Torino, Italy Musashino, Japan
Technical Highlights • The network consists of over 70 nodes from 13 vendors in the 7 carrier labs • Equipment includes Ethernet switches, routers, MSPPs, SONET/SDH cross-connects, OADMs, ROADMs • Ethernet Services demonstrated: • Ethernet Private Line service • Enabled by OIF optical control plane • Virtual Ethernet services (Virtual Private Line, Virtual Private LAN, Internet Access/Virtual Trunking) • Enabled by VLAN tags
Major Accomplishments • Multi-layer call/connection control of UNI-N devices • Orchestrates actions between client and server layers • Controls Ethernet adaptation using GFP-F/VCAT/LCAS • Creation of end-end calls and connections across: • Multiple data plane layers • Multiple vendors’ equipment • Multiple carrier labs • The major features (1) Ethernet over SONET/SDH adaptation and (2) distributed optical control planes have each been demonstrated before • However, this is the first event bringing both together in an integrated fashion on a global scale
Feedback from OIF/ASON Prototyping Work • Prototyping of ASON routing principles • Participation by OIF members in IETF Joint Design Team • IETF Routing Evaluation draft (RFC 4652) • Followed up by IETF Solutions draft, in progress • Example Areas: • Flexible distribution of control and data plane elements • Modified SONET/SDH bandwidth accounting
NE NE NE Flexible Distribution of Control and Data Plane • Allow one Routing Controller to advertise for multiple Data Plane Nodes • Result: Supported by adding Local and Remote TE Router IDs to the Link State Advertisement • see draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-03.txt routing routing NE LSR Model ASON Model
Modified Bandwidth Accounting • Under certain conditions, overall bandwidth does not reflect ability to support connections • e.g., enough timeslots but not contiguous for a large signal type • Result: advertise actual availability for connections at each signal type if appropriate • see draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-03.txt
Outline • OIF Overview • Control Plane Interoperability Demonstrations • Current Work and Future Directions
OIF Optical Routing Activities • OIF-ENNI-OSPF-01.0 Implementation Agreement approved 01/2007 • OSPF-based Inter-domain routing within carrier network • Uses ITU-T G.7715 and G.7715.1 ASON routing requirements • Incorporates inputs from OIF Carrier WG • Documents prototyping of OSPF-based ASON routing • codepoints used for prototyping purposes • prototyping example • Points towards future incorporation of routing standards work from IETF and ITU-T
OIF Optical Signaling Activities • OIF UNI 2.0 Implementation Agreement in progress • Adds MEF-based Ethernet UNI service interface • Ethernet Private Line and Virtual Private Line • MEF traffic parameters (liaison with IETF CCAMP) • Ethernet Label formats (liaison with IETF CCAMP) • Ethernet bandwidth modification • OTN and sub-STS-1 rate services • OIF E-NNI Signaling 2.0 also in progress • Ethernet support over VCAT SONET/SDH • Bandwidth modification using VCAT group resizing • Multilayer model derived from ASON work
Ethernet Virtual Connection over VCAT Ethernet Client Domain A Ethernet Client Domain B Domain C • added VCAT sublayer coordinates end-to-end VCAT group setup and teardown OIF E-NNI OIF E-NNI OIF UNI OIF UNI NE NE NE NE NE NE Ethernet SONET/SDH Ethernet UNI-N UNI-N UNI-C UNI-C Ethernet Layer Call/Connection Flow VCAT Layer Call/Connection Flow SONET/SDH Layer Call/Connection Flow
Link DB Link DB OIF Discovery Progress • Prototyping work in progress • Relies on ITU-T G.7714.1 Layer Adjacency Discovery specification • Exchange Discovery messages over J0 • Follow up with miswiring detection Neighbor Discovery 1. J0: (Node A, Port 5) 2. J0: (Node B, Port 2) Node B Node A 3. Verify Wiring 4. Verify Wiring {B.2, A.5} {A.5, B.2}
OIF Security Work • Security requirements • Driven largely by input from US Dept. of Defense • For UNI, ENNI and Management interfaces • Application of IPSEC and IKE technology • Use of Syslog for event recording • Documented in multiple IAs • OIF-SEP-01.0, OIF-SEP-02.1, OIF-SMI-01.0 • Working now with IETF MPLS/GMPLS security framework design team
Thank you! For more information on the OIF please visit www.oiforum.com