180 likes | 271 Views
IR analysis for HBr,E0,V(m+4),V(m+5) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PPT-210912ak.ppt. C:Documents and SettingskennariMy DocumentsDropboxREMPIFrom LongHCl EvsV paperGraphs and tables. Energy level.
E N D
IR analysis for HBr,E0,V(m+4),V(m+5) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PPT-210912ak.ppt
C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
Energy level C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
https://notendur.hi.is//~jil3/work/HBr/H+%20HBr+%20Intensity%20ratio.pdfhttps://notendur.hi.is//~jil3/work/HBr/H+%20HBr+%20Intensity%20ratio.pdf
IR values: C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xlshttps://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xlshttps://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp
D1(z-axis/out of plane axis) Points for 0 < D1 < 0.001 -for W2 £ W3 Points for Above (AK analysi) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0
W2=49.8, W3=87.7: Points for Above (JL analysis) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0
The difference between AK and JL could be because of differen initial Values for WL and WH(?)
This suggests that WL & WH are high (ca. WL=50, WH = 88) i.e. chisq lowers as WL and WH increase and that g >0 (g error < g value) https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls
Now let´s look at E(J´) and dE(J´) for the V states: See slides 2 and 3 above.
DE(J´) This turns out to be no better! DE(J´) (V(m+5)) ? Guess DE(J´) (V(m+5)) Predictions by JL DE(J´) (V(m+4)) J´=7: 273 instead of 266 J´=8: 250 instead of 235 J´=9: 230 instead of 200 ? J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
DE(J´) DE(J´) (V(m+5)) ? ? DE(J´) (V(m+5)) Predictions by JL DE(J´) (V(m+4)) J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
DE(J´) J´=7: 243 instead of 266 J´=8: 196 instead of 235 J´=9: 145 instead of 200 DE(J´) (V(m+5)) ? ? DE(J´) (V(m+5)) Predictions by JL DE(J´) (V(m+4)) Guess For testing This turns out to be no better! J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
DE(J´,J´-1) DE(J´,J´-1) V(m+4) DE(J´,J´-1) V(m+5) J´ https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:2, Gr:1