1 / 34

Values and Stewardship for a Stronger Tomorrow

Values and Stewardship for a Stronger Tomorrow. Budget Worksession February 11, 2010. February 11 th Budget Worksession. Technical Changes to Superintendent’s Requested Budget State Revenue Update Impacts of Shortfalls Coaching Model Update 8 Period Schedule Guidance Impact

marcie
Download Presentation

Values and Stewardship for a Stronger Tomorrow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Values and Stewardship for a Stronger Tomorrow Budget Worksession February 11, 2010

  2. February 11th Budget Worksession • Technical Changes to Superintendent’s Requested Budget • State Revenue Update • Impacts of Shortfalls • Coaching Model Update • 8 Period Schedule • Guidance Impact • Tiered Reductions • Redistricting Options

  3. Changes to Requested Budget Demographic Change Adjustments: $179,713 HR Transfer (Revenue): $1,428 Local Revenue Change: $56,089 Total: ($237,230) Original Gap (Sups. Requested): ($928,796) Current Total Shortfall: ($1,166,026)

  4. State Revenue Update • Composite Index Change: ($5.2M) • Potential Sales Tax Distribution: ($1.0M) • Potential Statewide Education Reduction:($2.8M) • Delegate Bell’s Bill: $2.6M • Total Potential State Shortfall: ($2.6M) to ($9.0M) • With All Shortfalls: ($3.8M) to ($10.2M)

  5. Potential Shortfalls and Reductions TIER 2 REDUCTIONS TIER 3 REDUCTIONS POTENTIAL GAP $4.85M $3.56M $1.61M POTENTIAL SHORTFALLS $3.8M to $10.2M $10.00 $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 (in millions)

  6. <2007

  7. Instructional Coaching February 11, 2010

  8. Instructional Coaching Model Assumptions *shared at Principals meeting, January 2009 • Dynamic implementation and continuous improvement of FQL, TPA and PLC • Reduces variance in the implementation of best teaching and learning practices • Influences teaching practices in individual classrooms • Engages/facilitates teachers around learning • Supports investment in school-based changes/development • School-based and centrally managed • Promotes vertical/horizontal communications and decisions • Uses in-school and cross-school collaborative team-centered approach

  9. Instructional Coaching Model Assumptions *shared at Principals meeting, January 2009 • Dynamic implementation and continuous improvement of FQL, TPA and PLC • Reduces variance in the implementation of best teaching and learning practices • Influences teaching practices in individual classrooms • Engages/facilitates teachers around learning • Supports investment in school-based changes/development • School-based and centrally managed • Promotes vertical/horizontal communications and decisions • Uses in-school and cross-school collaborative team-centered approach

  10. With whom are coaches collaborating? * Data collected during Instructional Coaches’ Mid-Year Review, January 2010

  11. On which TPA domains are teachers & coaches collaborating? * Data collected during Instructional Coaches’ Mid-Year Review, January 2010

  12. Breakdown of Planning, Delivery and Assessment of Instruction * Data collected during Instructional Coaches’ Mid-Year Review, January 2010

  13. Handout Stakeholder Voices on Instructional Coaching

  14. 8-Period Schedule Albemarle County School Board Thursday, February 11, 2010

  15. Monticello/Western Albemarle Schedule

  16. Albemarle High School

  17. 8-Period Schedules

  18. 8-Period BlockSchedules

  19. 8-Period Block Schedule

  20. Advantages of 4x4 vs AB Teachers teach 6 out of 8 but only 3 per semester Students take only 4 classes per semester Allows for quick recovery of credits Will provide systematic intervention & remediation Schedule are more aligned with post-secondary- Piedmont & UVA Better opportunities for sharing staff Possibly eliminate middle & high summer school Reduce number of textbooks needed SOL testing spread out over two semesters – technology & students

  21. 8-Period BlockSchedule

  22. 8-Period BlockSchedule

  23. 8-Period BlockSchedule

  24. What schedules are schools in our area using? 7 Period Greene County 7 Period A/B Albemarle County Charlottesville City Rockingham County Waynesboro City 4 x 4 Block Augusta County Fluvanna County Harrisonburg City Louisa County Madison County Nelson County Orange County

  25. 8-Period Financial SavingsTeachers teach 6 out of 8 periods vs. 5 out of 7

  26. 8-Period Financial SavingsTeachers teach 6 out of 8 periods vs. 5 out of 7

  27. 8 Period ScheduleIssues for Implementation in 2010/2011 Positives Saves a total of 12.68 FTE ~ $837,780 All middle and high schools will be on the same schedule – better able to share staff Increases Learning Opportunities for Students Lessen impact of class size increases Negatives Timing of Decisions/Communication Top-Down Loss of class time for AHS student/athletes and coaches Loss of bank time for high school clock hours

  28. http://docs.google.com/a/k12albemarle.org/Doc?docid=0AfN91aeUXsi2ZGdqOTJ6dGJfMWo4dGIyN2R6&hl=enhttp://docs.google.com/a/k12albemarle.org/Doc?docid=0AfN91aeUXsi2ZGdqOTJ6dGJfMWo4dGIyN2R6&hl=en

  29. School Counselor Restructuring • Initiatives to increase guidance services have been • funded over the past several years. • These initiatives could be rolled back to deliver • guidance and career awareness services at the levels • previously provided.

  30. Specifics • Prior to 2006, High School Counselors were staffed as follows: • The Guidance Director was assigned a 150 student case load. Counselors were added at a ratio of 300 students to one counselor. • Starting in 2006, High School Counselors are currently staffed as follows: • A school is assigned one 12 month counselor for 287 students. Counselors are added at a ratio of 225 students to one counselor.

  31. Specifics • Rolling back the 2006 initiative would reduce high school counselor staffing by 2.03 FTE (roughly $134,123 across the high schools). School Counselor Staffing Re-Organization

  32. Tier 2 Reductions (Page A-43)Total Reductions: $3,561,720 • Shared PrincipalBetween Two Small Schools - Southern and Western Feeder Pattern • School Resource Officer (50%) • K-3 Class Size increase by 1 Student • One Elementary School Assistant Principal (TBD) • Reduce Calendar (2 days) - Personnel and $5,770/day in Transportation savings • System wide Furloughs

  33. Tier 3 Reductions (Page A-55 to A57)Total Reductions: $4,846,475 • 8 Period Day for MS & HS • 11 Month Assistant Principals • Elementary PE Max Staffing at 1.33 FTE • Eliminate Elem Art/Music/PE Staffing over SOQ • Differentiated Staffing Reductions • Reduce 3 Technical/Instructional Coach Positions Retained for 1 year • Others?

  34. Redistricting • Redistrict Middle Schools • Redistricting of AHS from AAA to AA status

More Related