150 likes | 164 Views
A vehicle for improving government efficiency and governance. MAIN THEMES. IMF Code of Good Practices— summary and rationale Implementation plans and challenges Experience so far. IMF Standards and Codes. http://www.imf.org/external/ Standards & Codes. Structure of the Code.
E N D
A vehicle for improving government efficiency and governance
MAIN THEMES IMF Code of Good Practices— summary and rationale Implementation plans and challenges Experience so far
IMF Standards and Codes http://www.imf.org/external/ Standards & Codes
Structure of the Code The Code is based on four general principles: • Roles and responsibilities of and within government should be clear • Comprehensive reliable information on fiscal activities should be available to the public • The processes of budget preparation, execution, and reporting should be open • There should be independent assurance of integrity of information
The Code’s Vertical Structure • The Code is organized in a hierarchy of principles and practices, which progressively define good practice in fiscal transparency: • Four general principles • Specific principles • Good practices
Why Transparency? Improved transparency is seen as a necessary basis for improving efficiency and effectiveness of fiscal management: • Better information will make government more accountable and lead to better fiscal policies • Transparency will be reinforced by financial markets—which will provide further incentives for sound fiscal policies
Fiscal transparency thus provides.. • A powerful force to link government policies to market forces; and • Available evidence indicates that • fiscal transparency promotes sound fiscal policies; and • lack of transparency contributes to poor economic performance
Limits to Fiscal Transparency • Should not interfere with due decision-making process • Due care in providing market sensitive information • Limits must be set on basis of cost effectiveness
Transparency and Governance • Transparency is necessary for government accountability and helps to limit public sector corruption. • It should be an important element in improving governance alongside other reforms: • Civil service reform • Regulatory reform • Anti-corruption programs
Implementation of the Code • Voluntary implementation • Diversity across countries • Technical assistance • Cooperation among international agencies
Voluntary Implementation • The Manual and questionnaire—available from the web site—are designed to facilitate self-assessment by countries • Technical help will be available from FAD to assist in completing the questionnaire • 11 countries have completed experimental reports on fiscal transparency standards; more are underway
Diversity Many member countries will not be able to meet all of the requirements of good practice…. • Manual proposes minimum standard requirements • Technical assistance will be provided (by IMF and other agencies) to help meet Code requirements in developing and transition economies
Technical Assistance &Cooperation • Self-assessment against the Code provides a benchmark for TA needs and ex post evaluation • Traditional TA will emphasize fiscal transparency impact • Surveillance and technical consultations will identify specific country needs • Need close cooperation on assessment and follow-up
Experience so far • ROSC being established as main vehicle to promote transparency in Fund surveillance activities • 11 fiscal ROSCs completed and on the website, another 7 near completion, 15-20 proposed for FY 2000/1 • Follow-up being established as a routine surveillance activity • Resource costs to the Fund (and countries) becoming substantial • Coordination with other agencies still limited
Institutionalization: some thoughts • Routine consultation on ROSC preparation • ROSCs to provide a basis for TA coordination and a benchmark for progress • Regional coordination to be encouraged • IFIs routinely advocate some specific standards (e.g., disclosure of contingent liabilities) • Supreme Audit Institutions (national audit/controller offices) encouraged to play a central role as transparency watchdogs