1 / 35

Two-Way Immersion Network for Catholic Schools

Two-Way Immersion Network for Catholic Schools. Day 2 Bilingualism, Language, and Literacy: Issues of development and assessment Patrick Proctor, Boston College Liz Howard, University of Connecticut. Goals. Make links between first and second language acquisition

mariko
Download Presentation

Two-Way Immersion Network for Catholic Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Two-Way Immersion Networkfor Catholic Schools Day 2 Bilingualism, Language, and Literacy: Issues of development and assessment Patrick Proctor, Boston College Liz Howard, University of Connecticut

  2. Goals • Make links between first and second language acquisition • Relate these links to assessment and instruction both in the classroom and in the context of the broader TWIN-CS mission • Provide greater detail regarding formative assessments and summative measures and how to use them to drive instruction and understand development • Provide resources to help with decision making and program implementation • Develop and implement strategies to identify, grow, and maintain significant funding prospects to support  the TWIN program over time

  3. Objectives • Understand basics of first and second language acquisition, and bilingualism • Make links between first and second language acquisition, bilingualism and TWIN-CS evaluation goals • Articulate similarities and differences between formative and summative measures and consider how they can be used to further program goals • Identify assessment approaches that are sensitive to language of instruction and that leverage bridging to promote expression of knowledge

  4. First and Second Language Acquisition

  5. Literacy Development and Bilingualism

  6. Key Terms • Oral language proficiency • Phonological processing • Syntax/grammar, vocabulary, morphology, semantics • Pragmatics • Orthography = how a language is written down • Decoding = taking written language and converting it to linguistic form • Comprehension = Understanding

  7. Monoliterate Developmental Considerations for Literacy • Watch video: • What elements of emergent literacy are present in the following clip? PLEASE SEE VIDEO LINK ON WEBSITE

  8. And then…[Please see video link on website]

  9. The Code

  10. Monoliterate Developmental Considerations for Early Literacy • Age 5 – School begins • Foundation of oral language proficiency alongside concepts of print • Word-level skills instruction (grades K – 2) • Alphabetic principle • Sound symbol relationships • Sight words (e.g. the, of, and, you) • Introduction of simple and decodable texts • Word level skills are rote and finite!!

  11. Orthographic Considerationsin Initial Literacy Instruction • Native English-speaking children were better at reading and spelling pseudowords (e.g., plyger, norpt) in English than Cantonese children, but there were not differences in reading/spelling real English words (Wang & Geva, 2003). Why might that be? • Orthography (the way language is written down) is salient for bilingual learners • Spanish-English share many letters and sounds in common • Chinese-English share none!

  12. In Summary • Children take their oral language skills and home literacy exposures to school with them • Reading instruction begins in Kindergarten and starts with a focus on the code which is the orthography of the language (i.e., how it is written down) • Instruction includes focus on sight words and phonics for decoding, along with small and independent work for reading and text exposure • There is potential for cross-linguistic instructional approaches when the two languages are similar, but not when they are completely different • Strong degrees of influence from a variety of life domains

  13. Language and Comprehension

  14. Language • Recall your work with Liz regarding language development • In 2-way programs, there are always second language learners • English language learners • Spanish/Mandarin Language learners • Language development is crucial for comprehension • Must be fostered from the earliest grades

  15. 2 examples of language and conceptual knowledge influencing reading comprehension

  16. The Marlup The marlup was poving his kump. Parmily a narghorped some whev in his kump. “Why did vumphorpwhev in mhfrinklekump?’ the marlupjufd the narg. “Er’m muvvilytrungy,” the narggrupped. “Erheshedvumpnorpledwhev in your tranquil kump.” Do vumppove your kumpfrinkle?

  17. Comprehension Questions 1. Who was poving his kump? 2. Who jufd the narg? 3. How trungy was the narg? 4. What kind of kump does the marlup have? 5. How would you feel if a narghorped in your marlup’s kump? Why?

  18. Rouche “Favorable conditions are necessary to do this activity. That is you have to have enough rouche. If there is too much rouche, the object might break. But if conditions are too calm, you will have problems because the rouche makes the object go up. If there are obstacles, a serious problem can result because you cannot control the rouche. Usually, the rouche is most favorable during the spring.” • Take 1 minute, read the paragraph, and define rouche

  19. Background Knowledge Matters • What strategies did you use to figure out the word’s meaning? • What do you now know about the word? • In a study, only 13 percent of participants without any background knowledge deduced a synonym for rouche • When provided with background knowledge, 78 percent correctly.

  20. Background knowledge is integral to vocabulary knowledge “Think about the last time you flew a kite. Favorable conditions are necessary to do this activity. That is you have to have enough rouche. If there is too much rouche, the kite might break. But if conditions are too calm, you will have problems because the rouche makes the kite go up. If there are obstacles, a serious problem can result because you cannot control the rouche. Usually, the rouche is most favorable during the spring.”

  21. Putting Them Together

  22. Breakout GroupsTwo groups, two sessions Session 1: 10:55 – 11:40 • Group 1 with Patrick • Focus on TWIN-CS formative and summative assessments • Group 2 with Liz • Focus on performance assessments and one of differentiating instruction and assessment by level of L2 Session 2: 11:45 – 12:30 • Group 2 with Patrick • Group 1 with Liz

  23. Formative & Summative Assessments • Features of formative assessments • Features of summative assessments

  24. Formative & Summative Assessments • Formative Assessments • Regularly administered • Targeted to explicit skills/aptitudes • Designed to inform instruction • “Real-time” assessments • Summative Assessments • Assess how much learning has taken place • Not designed to inform instruction, but rather to measure student learning and/or development

  25. TWIN-CS Research/PracticeDesign Summative approach “The Riverside Publishing Company, the assessment division of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH), is providing each school with a gratis Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey assessment in order to monitor student/program progress.  HMH looks forward to assisting all schools with providing high quality print and digital curriculum materials to culturally and linguistically diverse students”

  26. TWIN-CS Research/PracticeDesign Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey-Revised Summative Measures, individually administered, Fall and Spring of each academic year: • Real word reading (decoding) • Expressive vocabulary (oral language - vocabulary knowledge) • Verbal analogies (oral language verbal reasoning) • Passage comprehension (reading comprehension)

  27. Student Performance

  28. Classroom Performance Over Time

  29. Train the Trainers Model • Year 1 • Fall assessment by TWIN-CS staff • Onsite staff training for administration • Collaborative Spring assessments with TWIN-CS staff and school personnel • Year 2 • Continued assessment of 1st grade students • Initial assessment of K students

  30. Formative Approaches • Formative Assessments • Regularly administered • Targeted to explicit skills/aptitudes • Designed to inform instruction • “Real-time” assessments

  31. Curriculum Based Measurement • Periodic assessments (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly) administered by teachers designed to monitor literacy development • Kindergarten indicators = letter naming, letter sounds, word reading, pseudoword reading, word reading in context • Developmental; moving to read alouds and comprehension assessments as children age

  32. Curriculum Based MeasurementSample Graph

  33. Instructional Outcomes of CBM • Affect grouping configurations • Increase instructional time • Change a teaching technique or way of presenting the material • Change a grouping arrangement (for example, individual instruction instead of small-group instruction). • Post-change assess weekly scores on the graph to determine effectiveness.

  34. Set it up • Go to easycbm.com • Set up a username • Receive a password • Review process for a given grade level (reading and math)

  35. TWIN-CS Assessment and Evaluation Model: Case study model

More Related