1 / 8

2.1.2 Measurements

Only certain results found in quantum measurement: some quantities quantized (ang. mom., atomic energy levels) some continuous (position, momentum of a free particle). We can prepare quantum states that will definitely give any allowed result for a quantized observable

matty
Download Presentation

2.1.2 Measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Only certain results found in quantum measurement: some quantities quantized (ang. mom., atomic energy levels) some continuous (position, momentum of a free particle). We can prepare quantum states that will definitely give any allowed result for a quantized observable an arbitrarily small spread for continuous observables.  There is ‘something there’ to measure. SG z Ag SG z SG z Ag 2.1.2 Measurements

  2. SG−z SG z SG z Measurement (continued) | SG−z SG z Ag | • If we superpose definite states of a given observable, & measure the same observable, we randomly get one of the superposed values—never an ‘intermediate’ result. • Probability of result a, Prob(a)  |amplitude|2 in superposition. • We always get some result:  Probs = 1.

  3. Represent states of definite results (eigenstates) as a set of orthonormal basis vectors. Represent physical states as normalised vectors. Probability amplitude for result ai from state ψ: ci = ai |ψ. zero amplitude to get anything but ai in “definite ai” state. Use projectors instead, if degenerate. General state can always be decomposed into a superposition: Mathematical model

  4. Represent states of definite results (eigenstates) as a set of orthonormal basis vectors. Represent physical states as normalised vectors. Probability amplitude for result ai from state ψ: ci = ai |ψ. zero amplitude to get anything but ai in “definite ai” state. Use projectors instead, if degenerate. General state can always be decomposed into a superposition: Sum of probabilities = 1 is Pythagoras rule in N-D vector space! 1 cz|z |ψ cx|x cy|y Mathematical model

  5. 2.2 Redundant Mathematical Structure • A mathematical model for a physical process may contain things that don’t have any physical meaning. • e.g. in electromagnetism, vector potential is undetermined up to a gauge change: A A +  • Bad thing? May make the maths much easier! • In QM, physical states are represented by normalised vectors: • Ambiguous up to factor of eiθ, i.e. |ψ and eiθ|ψ represent the same state. • Normalised vectors do not make a vector space—maths requires vectors of all lengths. • Really, physical state equivalent to a ‘ray’ through the origin: normalisation is a convention as we could write: • Vectors of a particular length & phase needed when analysing a vector into a superposition.

  6. Redundancy (continued) • Vector space may include unphysical vectors: • all those with infinite energy, i.e. outside the domain of the energy operator, Ĥ, (e.g. discontinuous wave functions). • Should other operators (x ? p ?) have finite expected values? • Do all possible self-adjoint operators represent physical observables? • In practice, no: we only need a few dozen. • In theory, no: some self-adjoint ops represent things disallowed by ‘superselection’ — e.g. real particles are either bosons or fermions, not some mixture.

  7. Classical Mechanics

  8. Quantum Mechanics

More Related