1 / 20

Probate Mediation: Resolving Family Estate and Trust Disputes

Discover the benefits of probate mediation in resolving various issues such as estate, trust, conservatorship, and guardianship conflicts. Avoid costly and time-consuming litigation by reaching agreements in a private and confidential mediation process.

mauricel
Download Presentation

Probate Mediation: Resolving Family Estate and Trust Disputes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Probate Mediation

  2. Mediation is this area is relatively new.

  3. Mediation can be used in more than just will contests over Dad’s capacity. • Estate issues – has the PR acted appropriately • Trust issues – breach of fiduciary duty—investments • Conservatorship issues – how to pay for care, sell property • Guardianship issues – who should person live with, what facility

  4. Issues usually involve family conflicts • Blended families • Second marriages

  5. Parties want to maintain a relationship with other party • Don’t want to burn all their bridges

  6. Litigation is expensive and may take a long time • Mediation is less expensive and will take less time

  7. Litigation: judgment – usually only money damages • Mediation – parties help craft solution, can be creative

  8. Litigation: Outcomes are uncertain • Mediation: Parties reach agreement or choose not to agree

  9. Litigation: public • Mediation: private and confidential

  10. Litigation: courtroom • Mediation: conference room – parties/attorneys in separate rooms

  11. Litigation: decision maker usually a judge, no choice by parties • Mediation: parties jointly choose a mediator - person whose expertise “style” and personality best fits situation

  12. Litigation: evidence limited by legal rules: must be relevant, no hearsay • Mediation: no rules about evidence

  13. Litigation: court time often limited • Mediation: parties can choose how much time they want to spend

  14. Litigation: emotional toll often high • Mediation: less intimidating

  15. Litigation: winning party may appeal, difficulty collecting judgment • Mediation: no appeal, less likelihood that agreement won’t be honored by both sides

  16. Parties can choose to mediate before/after a lawsuit is filed • Parties choose mediator and sign mediation agreement • Parties submit a confidential statement to mediator explaining the issues, their positions and how the case might be resolved before mediation takes place

  17. Mediation session takes place – parties may or may not be represented by attorneys • Mediator talks with each side separately – exchanges information and ideas • Mediator assists parties to reach agreement • If parties reach agreement mediator writes up agreement and parties sign it that day

  18. Agreement can be presented to court for approval and enforcement if a lawsuit has been filed • If no agreement or partial agreement, parties can return to court

  19. Mediation/Arbitration- new idea being used primarily in domestic cases • Reach agreement in mediation on most cases • Mediator becomes arbiter to decide remains issue(s)

  20. Arbitration is required in many contracts nowadays • Arbitration is more like the court process • Usually can choose the arbiter • Setting more formal • Appellate rights are limited • Agreement is presented to court for approval and enforcement

More Related