260 likes | 387 Views
Dijet Analyses for ICD Resolution and Response. Barry Spurlock The University of Texas at Arlington April 8, 2004. OUTLINE. Motivation DPCC and How We Used It Data Analyses & Results Conclusions. Motivation. Dijet study of QCD background (P13) ICD-MG Task Force (ICD weighting factor)
E N D
Dijet Analyses for ICD Resolution and Response Barry Spurlock The University of Texas at Arlington April 8, 2004
OUTLINE • Motivation • DPCC and How We Used It • Data • Analyses & Results • Conclusions Barry Spurlock
Motivation • Dijet study of QCD background (P13) • ICD-MG Task Force (ICD weighting factor) • Initial analyses performed • 150k JT95TT events • More data • fixed & corrected • Needed more processing power • DPCC Barry Spurlock
DPCCDistributed & Parallel Computing Cluster • Joint effort including UTA CSE dept., UTA HEP dept., and UT Southwest Medical Center (Dallas) • 97 machines/193 processors • Pentium 4 Xeons at 2.4-2.6 GHz • Over 72 terabytes disk space • The DPCC is supported, in part, by the NSF grant EIA-0216500 Barry Spurlock
General Proceedure • “Submit_to_PBS” • Assign job names • Submits “run_in_batch” • “run_in_batch” • Copy data files, root macro, & tarfile • File list & root macro are chosen using the job name • Tarfile includes C++ program, header, MakeClasses • Runs the root macro as a ROOT batch job • Root macro makes classes, chains the data files, assigns values to global variables, & runs code • Compilation problems Barry Spurlock
Data & Data Processing • Started with thumbnails from QCD group skim of P13 jet data • 200GB, 1281 files, 9.7M events • tmbfixer & d0correct • Used d0tools to run • Took time to find right version of tmbfixer • d0correct compiled locally • Skimmed out JT45TT, JT65TT & JT95TT • Skimmed out events with exactly two ‘good’ JCCB jets, back-to-back (±10°) • 0.5<emf<.95, chf<0.4, hot<10.0, n90>1.0 • Events: 170k JT45TT, 160k JT65TT, 37k JT95TT Barry Spurlock
Analyses • ICD resolution versus ICD weighting factor • Dijet asymmetry and response by eta for various ICD weighting factors • Least squares best fit Barry Spurlock
ICD Resolution • CC-ICD and CC-MG events used • Cut on narrow ET band of CC jet • Sigma/E½ used as the resolution of probe • Resolution plotted against ICD factor for 6 ET bins (60, 75, 85, 100, 120, 150) Barry Spurlock
Dijet Asymmetry & Response • CC “control” jet in narrow ET range • Other jet used as probe • Plotted asymmetry and response by eta bin • Plots made for 6 ET bands (60, 75, 85, 100, 120, 150) and various values of ICD weighting factor • 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.4, 2.8, 3.0, 3.2, 3.4, 3.6, 3.8, 4.0, 4.2, 4.4, & 5.0 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 1.0 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 1.5 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 2.0 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 2.4 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 2.8 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 3.0 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 3.2 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 3.4 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 3.6 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 3.8 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 4.0 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 4.2 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 4.4 Barry Spurlock
JT65TT/100 GeV/Factor 5.0 Barry Spurlock
Best Fit (Least Squares) • ET from probe jet is broken into parts ETicd = icdf *ET ETccmg = ccmg*ET ETch = chf*ET ETecmg = ecmg*ET ETrem = ET – ETicd - ETccmg - ETecmg – Etch • A linear combination of these is set equal to the ET of the control jet. • A least squares fit is used to calculate the values of the factors for each part • This was performed over a variety of eta ranges and ET bands. • This was also performed where some of the coefficients were fixed to 1 Barry Spurlock
Example of Least Squares Fit Barry Spurlock
Results/Conclusions • Submitting 133 jobs at 3 hours each and having it done the next day is very nice! • …But getting all the results in such a short time is a bit overwhelming. • The results will be discussed at the ICD-MG task force meeting tomorrow • At a quick glance, 3.8 seems about right. Barry Spurlock