1 / 13

GEA national Grant Program

GEA national Grant Program. Sebastian Uijtdehaage, PhD Maria Blanco, EdD SDRME Summer Meeting Charleston, SC June 23, 2014. Objectives. Step back process: 10 minutes: brief description of the GEA Grant Program and summary of the 2014 submissions 5 minutes: clarify questions

Download Presentation

GEA national Grant Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GEA national Grant Program Sebastian Uijtdehaage, PhD Maria Blanco, EdD SDRME Summer Meeting Charleston, SC June 23, 2014

  2. Objectives Step back process: • 10 minutes:brief description of the GEA Grant Program and summary of the 2014 submissions • 5 minutes: clarify questions • 20 minutes: Seek the group’s consultation on program challenges • 5 minutes: Debrief

  3. Program aims • Develop community of scholars • Advance medical education research and innovation • Foster collaborations among GEA sections, regions, schools, professions, departments Available Funds: $10,000 Developed/administered by MESRE

  4. GEA National Grant Committee • Sebastian Uijtdehaage • Maria Blanco • Karen Szauter • Sara Kim • Janet Riddle • Scott Cottrell • Steve Durning Charge: • Develop RFP • Develop/administer review process • Make funding decision

  5. Target areas in RFP • Implications across the training continuum of the transition to accountable care in general, and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act in particular. • Innovations in faculty development. • Inter-professional education. • Curricular innovations (competency-based education, EPAs, milestones, creative approaches to delivery of education-flipped classroom, MOOCs, simulations, etc).

  6. Submission process Pre-proposals (3 pages) • Lit review • Conceptual framework • Study objectives and research question/hypothesis • Methods • Anticipated outcomes • Total funds requested and preliminary budget breakdown • Qualifications of research team • References Full proposals (5 pages) • Budget justification • Power analysis • Bio sketches • Letters of support 62 4

  7. Number of submissions per region

  8. Common themes

  9. Type of Proposal

  10. What GEA section was targeted?

  11. Type of Collaboration

  12. GEA Grant Program: your input • How should we evaluate the impact of the program? • What should be the future direction of program in terms of: • Target topics • Type of submission (research vs. innovation) • How can we increase funds? • How can we further develop program?

  13. Clarifying questions?

More Related