130 likes | 274 Views
GEA national Grant Program. Sebastian Uijtdehaage, PhD Maria Blanco, EdD SDRME Summer Meeting Charleston, SC June 23, 2014. Objectives. Step back process: 10 minutes: brief description of the GEA Grant Program and summary of the 2014 submissions 5 minutes: clarify questions
E N D
GEA national Grant Program Sebastian Uijtdehaage, PhD Maria Blanco, EdD SDRME Summer Meeting Charleston, SC June 23, 2014
Objectives Step back process: • 10 minutes:brief description of the GEA Grant Program and summary of the 2014 submissions • 5 minutes: clarify questions • 20 minutes: Seek the group’s consultation on program challenges • 5 minutes: Debrief
Program aims • Develop community of scholars • Advance medical education research and innovation • Foster collaborations among GEA sections, regions, schools, professions, departments Available Funds: $10,000 Developed/administered by MESRE
GEA National Grant Committee • Sebastian Uijtdehaage • Maria Blanco • Karen Szauter • Sara Kim • Janet Riddle • Scott Cottrell • Steve Durning Charge: • Develop RFP • Develop/administer review process • Make funding decision
Target areas in RFP • Implications across the training continuum of the transition to accountable care in general, and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act in particular. • Innovations in faculty development. • Inter-professional education. • Curricular innovations (competency-based education, EPAs, milestones, creative approaches to delivery of education-flipped classroom, MOOCs, simulations, etc).
Submission process Pre-proposals (3 pages) • Lit review • Conceptual framework • Study objectives and research question/hypothesis • Methods • Anticipated outcomes • Total funds requested and preliminary budget breakdown • Qualifications of research team • References Full proposals (5 pages) • Budget justification • Power analysis • Bio sketches • Letters of support 62 4
GEA Grant Program: your input • How should we evaluate the impact of the program? • What should be the future direction of program in terms of: • Target topics • Type of submission (research vs. innovation) • How can we increase funds? • How can we further develop program?