E N D
Slide 1:The US current account deficit: dark matter or black hole?
“Globalization Outlook: Its Impacts and our Region’s Response” March 30, 2006, Shawnee State University, Portsmouth, Ohio Ian Sheldon OSU AED Economics
Slide 2:Key indicators for the US economy
GDP growing at annual rate of 3.3% US inflation rate rising ? 3.6% Interest rate ? 4.75%, 2 year bonds – 4.79%, 10 year bonds ? 4.78% Fiscal deficit $427 billion ? 3.7% of GDP Current account deficit $805 billion ? 6.8% of GDP (2006 ? $1 trillion)
Slide 3:What is the US current account?
Current account balance = Exports - Imports + Return on Assets - Liabilities Trade Balance Investment Income = Assets – Liabilities (adjusted for capital gains) International Investment Position
Slide 4:The cumulative deficit…….
US Current Account and International Investment Position ($ billion) ($ billion) Source: BEA Net foreign assets Current account Cumulative current account
Slide 5:A black hole?
External debt generating significant concern: ? “the US is now on the comfortable path to ruin” (Martin Wolf, Financial Times, 2004) ? “any sober policymaker ought to regard the US current account deficit as a sword of Damocles over the global economy” (Maurice Obstfeld and Kenneth Rogoff, 2005) Others claim: ? “this is just confusion caused by an unnatural set of accounting rules” (Ricardo Hausmann and Federico Sturzenegger, 2005) $
Slide 6:Is there dark matter?
Net foreign assets ?- $2.5 trillion in 2004 Yet US earned +$36.2 billion on assets in 2004 ? implying net foreign assets of +$724 billion given a 5% rate of return Income flow steady since 1980 ? net foreign asset stability, i.e., “dark matter” Dark matter results in current account stability
Slide 7:Effect of dark matter
Current account with and without dark matter Source: BEA/IMF Current account without dark matter Current account with dark matter
Slide 8:What is dark matter?
Difference due to “dark matter”: ? returns to US “know-how” ? provision of liquidity ? US earns a risk premium Story has serious problems: ? analysis sensitive to fixed rate of return ? $724 billion of assets in 2004 smaller in relation to overall economy compared to 1980 ? dark matter actually very unstable
Slide 9:Is the deficit “made” in China?
Politicians see China as the culprit Yuan pegged to US$ for past decade, but abandoned in July 2005 Yuan would have to appreciate by 5-10% to even dent deficit China accounts for only a fraction of US trade deficit
Freeing up the YuanSlide 11:A lack of US savings?
Net national saving at 2% of GDP – lowest since the Great Depression Personal savings rate is negative Consumers borrowing against increasing house prices ? 13%/year Debt service at a record high
US savings ratesSlide 13:Is it “Bernankeconomics”?
Dismisses “twin-deficits” argument Lack of US savings more likely due to external factors A “global savings glut” ? helps finance US trade deficit Link between growth and interest rates may not hold at present
Where is the glut though?Slide 15:Investment vs. savings
Low investment rates may explain low interest rates, but not imbalance between US and world Explanation lies in differing economic structures and policies: ? fiscal/monetary stimulus in US since 2001 ? China’s savings rate and rising price of oil ? Asia has built up foreign-exchange reserves
Slide 16:Foreign-exchange reserves and US bonds
Increased foreign exchange reserves 50% of US bonds purchased by foreign central banks in 2003/4 In 2004 ? foreign central banks financed 60-70% of US trade deficit US treasury bond yields determined in Beijing ? a “balance of financial terror” (Larry Summers, 2004)
Foreign exchange reservesSlide 18:Why the build-up of reserves?
1997-98 Asian financial crisis Policies of export-led growth and pegged currencies in Asia Absorption of large Chinese labor force with high savings rate Weak domestic banking systems in Asia Need for international financial intermediation ? currency reserves provide protection against capital “flight”
Slide 19:A “big bang”?
Asian central banks face huge risk by holding reserves in dollar-denominated assets Decline in purchase of US bonds would cause US$ to depreciate Short-term rates and bond yields would have to rise End result ? global recession
Slide 20:Too pessimistic?
Purchases of US bonds fell in 2005, yet US$ appreciated Recent currency depreciations followed by falling bond yields Investors believe inflation has been tamed by monetary authorities Greenspan may be right ? US imbalances will adjust gradually
Slide 21:Ian Sheldon
Dept. of Agricultural, Environmental & Development Economics The Ohio State University 234 Ag Administration 2120 Fyffe Rd Columbus, OH 43210-1067 sheldon.1@osu.edu (614) 292-2194 http://aede.osu.edu/people