360 likes | 516 Views
A NEW ACADEMIC WORDLIST. A veril C oxhead Hüsem Korkmaz MA TEFL. The General Service List (GSL). was developed from a corpus of 5 million words with the needs of ESL/EFL learners in mind, contains the most widely useful 2,000 word families in English. The
E N D
A NEW ACADEMIC WORDLIST Averil Coxhead Hüsem Korkmaz MA TEFL
The General Service List (GSL) • wasdeveloped from acorpus of 5 million words with the needs of ESL/EFL learners in mind, • contains the most widely useful 2,000 word families in English. The GSL has been criticised for its size (Engels, 1968), age (Richards, 1974),and need for revision (Hwang, 1989). Despite these criticisms, the GSLcovers up to
A variety of word lists havebeen compiled either by hand or by computer to identify the most usefulwords in an academic vocabulary. • Campion and Elley (1971) • Praninskas (1972) Corporaandidentifiedwordsthatoccuredacross a range of texts • Lynn (1973) • Ghadessy(1979) Studentannotatitonsabovewords in textbooks • Xue and Nation (1984) University Word List(UWL) Combination of thefourlistsmentioned
University Word List (UWL) TheUWL has been widely used by learners, teachers, course designers, andresearchers. However, as an amalgam of the four different studies, itlacked consistent selection principles and had many of the weaknesses ofthe prior work. The corpora on which the studies were based were smalland did not contain a wide and balanced range of topics.
However, • there is a need for a newacademic word list based on data gathered from a large, well-designedcorpus of academic English. • The ideal word list would be divided intosmaller, frequency-based sublists to aid in the sequencing of teachingand in materials development. • A word list based on the occurrence ofword families in a corpus of texts representing a variety of academicregisters can provide information about how words are actually used
Whattokeep in mindwhiledevelopingACADEMIC CORPORAandWORD LISTS?
Thedevelopment of AcademicCorporaand Word Lists REPRESENTATION ORGANIZATION SIZE WORD SELECTION
Questionsframing the description of the AWL: • Which lexical items occur frequently and uniformlyacross a widerange of academic material but are not among the first 2,000 wordsof English as given in the GSL (West, 1953)? • Do the lexical items occur with different frequencies in arts, commerce,law, and science texts?
The evaluation of the AWL • What percentage of the words in the Academic Corpus does the AWLcover? • Do the lexical items identified occur frequently in an independentcollection of academic texts? • How frequently do the words in the AWL occur in nonacademictexts? • How does the AWL compare with the UWL (Xue & Nation, 1984)?
Evaluation of AWL To evaluate the AWL, its coverage of these is discussed and compared with the UWL: • (a) the Academic Corpus along with the GSL (West, 1953) • (b) a second collection of academic texts • (c) a collection of fiction texts
Developing the Academic Word List Selection criteria for words:
Questionsframing the description of the AWL: • Which lexical items occur frequently and uniformlyacross a widerange of academic material but are not among the first 2,000 wordsof English as given in the GSL (West, 1953)? 570 word families
Questionsframing the description of the AWL: • Do the lexical items occur with different frequencies in arts, commerce,law, and science texts?
The evaluation of the AWL • What percentage of the words in the Academic Corpus does the AWLcover? The AWL accountsfor 10.0 of thetokens in theAcademicCorpus GSL (2000 words) + AWL = 86 % of theAcademicCorpus
The evaluation of the AWL • Do the lexical items identified occur frequently in an independentcollection of academic texts? A secondcorpuswasmadeup of textsthat had met thecriteriaforinclusion in theAcademicCorpus but were not includedeitherbecausetheywerecollectedtoolateorbecausethesubjectareatheybelongedtowasalreadycompleter
The evaluation of the AWL • How frequently do the words in the AWL occur in nonacademictexts? • TheAcademicWordlist – Project Gutenberg(50 texts) • AWL accountsfor1,4 % of thetokens in PG collection (lowerthanAWL’s10 %coverage of AcademicCorpus) • Hugedifferencesuggests AWL wordfamiliesaremostlyassociatedwithacademicwriting
The evaluation of the AWL • How does the AWL compare with the UWL (Xue & Nation, 1984)? Thoughsmallerthan UWL, AWL gives a betterreturn on learning, as studentsneedtolearnonly 570 wordfamiliesinstead of 836 forthesamecoverage of academictexts.
How does the AWL compare with the UWL (Xue & Nation, 1984)? AWL UWL 401 435 word families 51 % 135
How does the AWL compare with the UWL (Xue & Nation, 1984)? • UWL includes 570 word families that do not occur in the Academic Corpus. So, even if the students learn these words, they might rarely or never meet them in academic texts. • AWL is smaller than UWL in size. However, it has a higher coverage of academic texts • AWL covers a wider range of subject areas
ImplicationsforTeaching Set vocabularygoalsfor EAP courses Constructrelevantteachingmaterials Helpstudentsfocus on usefulvocabularyitems Directlyteachthewords in the AWL
For detailed information: AWL: http://www.uefap.com/vocab/select/awl.htm Project Gutenberg: http://www.gutenberg.net
Thanks for your participation and attention… Hüsem Korkmaz