E N D
Draft Titlesdraft-jaihyung-ccamp-arpsignal-00.txt“Use of ARP and Flood Routing Technique for LSP setup in ECPN”Other Submitted Drafts :- draft-jaihyung-ccamp-lserequirement-00.txt“Requirement for (G)MPLS implantation over Ethernet”- draft-jaihyung-ccamp-lseframework-00.txt“Framework for (G)MPLS implementation in Ethernet based Customer Premise Network” Author : Jaihyung Cho jaihyung@etri.re.kr 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005
Proposal : Use GMPLS Control for Bridge • Ethernet QoS need Reservation • L2 LSP may be a Cost-effective Solution for Ethernet QoS 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005
Issue : RSVP may not be appropriate for Ethernet • See draft-jaihyung-ccamp-arpsignal-00.txt for discussion • RFC2814, RFC2815, RFC2816 : RSVP for 802 Networks • Heaviness, weak security, operational difficulty, low industry support, etc.. • USE ARP !!! for L2 LSP setup Ethernet Switches ARP Signal Premium Core 20M/4M 1G 100M 1G VDSL VDSL modem BRAS N-SW L3SW DSLAM KORNET(BE) L2 LSP 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005
Why use ARP ? • Ubiquitous deployment in all terminals • Receiver capability is not mandatory • LSP can be established in partial deployment • Designed to carry MAC address • Appropriate if MAC address is used for Label • New Session auto triggering of ARP • Connection to unknown terminal ARP 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005
Incorporation of Routing • Use Flood Routing !! technique • Establish LSP via optimum path for QoS 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005
Next Actions • Call for participation on L2SC issues • Request for review/feedback • Call for contribution to the 3 drafts • Send your proposal, that we can add • More drafts to come • Ethernet based Access Network • Core network implementation using High-performance Ethernet Bridges 62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005