270 likes | 559 Views
? Kent Telecare Pilot ? Kent TeleHealth Pilot ? Benefits seen from local trials ? Future WSD Evaluation . Population: 1.4 million peopleArea: 1537 square miles, 98 miles long with the longest coastline of any county. 18 towns and 400 villages 3 Acute NHS Hospital Trusts 2 Primary Care Commissioning Trusts Over 65's due to increase by 30% and over 85's by 10% in next 15years.
E N D
6. Background to Telecare in Kent
KCC: invested in Telecare services to promote security, independence and wellbeing.
Telecare is not new - There were already a number of existing community alarm providers.
Social care / health services needed to make more use of technology if we were to provide more flexible services for the ageing population.
7. The Kent Experience 6 pilot sites across the county consisting of 900+ service users
Just another tool in the bag
Positive feedback from service
users and carers - 93% felt more
independent since Telecare was
installed, and 93% also felt safer in their own homes.
8. Key Lessons So Far Response / Support infrastructure
essential to success
Realising potential of Telecare means:-
Better use of existing resources,
Improved communication and partnership working between professionals, users and carers, and across agencies, and
More flexible services focused on
the needs and priorities of service
users and carers.
11. Key Lessons Time investment
Infrastructure & Resources
Partnerships & Relationships
Marketing
Targeted intervention
Case finding & data quality
inclusion criteria
Partnerships & Relationships
delivery models
14. TeleHealth Significantly reduced acute sector activity.Case-study: 85 year old male with COPD, with a history of frequent hospital admissions as a result of exacerbation. Managed successfully within the comfort of his own home through early pharmacological interventions and physiotherapy and as a result has not needed any further admissions to hospital.
Early detection of imminent exacerbation.Case-study: Female with weight monitoring. Rapid increase was highlighted and risk of exacerbation identified. Treated with diuretics and weight was controlled.
15. TeleHealth Better medicines managementCase-study: 86 year old female taking a beta blocker for hypertension. The drug caused bradycardia which was detected and an ace inhibitor successfully used to replace the beta blocker.
In some cases diagnosis of previously undetected conditionsCase-study:...gentleman with COPD and CHD was set up on the system recently and was found to be bradycardic. Subsequent investigations have identified that the patient will need to have a pacemaker fitted, Community Matron
Interventions change from reactive to proactiveCase-study: 49 year old male, ISD, uncontrolled malignant hypertension. Hypertension now controlled, a plan of action established for the patient to follow and care packaged better tailored to suit. Result is 0 admissions in 6 months since installation.
19. > 64 years made up 16% of the population but accounted for 47% of hospital and community health spending (Evandrou,2005)
20% of older people had attended an outpatient or casualty department in the previous year
10% of older people had a hospital inpatient stay in year
Use of personal social services also increased exponentially with age (Evandrou, 2005)
Health & Social Service Use and Age
20. Participants Patients with long term conditions (heart failure, COPD and diabetes)
Patients with social care needs
Patients with long term conditions AND social care needs
21. Evaluation Themes Theme 1
Impact on service use and associated costs for the NHS and social services (return on investment).
Theme 2
Participant-reported outcomes and clinical effectiveness.
Theme 3
Cost and cost-effectiveness, relationship of costs to other outcomes?
Theme 4
Qualitative Studies to determine experience of TC & TH
Theme 5
What organisational factors facilitate or impede the sustainable adoption and integration of telehealth/telecare?
22. Proving the Business Case
23. World Class Evaluation Team
24. Evaluation design c6000 service users in the evaluation
Randomised controlled trial:
Intervention groups and control groups to assess the impact of AAT in addition to usual care i.e. both groups receive the same care and the only difference is that the intervention group are also receiving AAT
Real time
Cluster design: minimises administration when compared with individualised randomisation
26. Evaluation Process