140 likes | 300 Views
T he Contemporary Party System. October 27, 2011. Evolution of the Nomination Process. Stage 1: King Caucus. Stage 2: Nominating Conventions. Stage 3: Progressive Era Reforms. Stage 4: Post-1968 Reforms. What did we end up with?. 2-step nomination process
E N D
The Contemporary Party System October 27, 2011
What did we end up with? • 2-step nomination process • State-level direct primaries and caucuses open to all party members • National conventions with delegates pledged to candidates based on primary/caucus results • 2nd step is basically a formality • National conventions rubberstamp primary/caucus results • “Brokered conventions” are a remote possibility
Unintended Consequences • Good primary election candidates aren’t necessarily good general election candidates • Money and media matter more • “Long primary season” • Frontloading • Bandwagons and Leapfrogging • http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-flash08.html?project=PRIMARY_HISTORY • State vs. national PO power struggles • Parties come out worse for the wear
The Invisible Primary • A.k.a. the money primary • Months (years?) leading up to the first caucuses and primaries • Jonathan Bernstein: “the pre-voting stage of the contest, in which candidates compete for the support of various party actors—campaign professionals, formal party officials, politicians, activists, members of party-aligned interest groups, and the partisan media. Sometimes that competition is out in the open, but a lot of it takes place fairly quietly.”
Who “votes” in the IP? • The media (“the Murdoch primary”) • “Party leaders, aligned groups, and activists” (Cohen et al., The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform, p. 4) • “Power outsiders” in key primary/caucus states • Outsiders to DC, but powerful insiders in their state/local communities