1 / 17

PARTICIPATORY PLANNING AND POLICY INFLUENCE EXPERIENCES FROM NAMIBIA

Learn about the evolution of participatory planning in Namibia's housing sector, from pre-independence to community-driven initiatives. Explore key government responses and the impact on informal settlements. Discover how participatory information collection is shaping future developments.

melanson
Download Presentation

PARTICIPATORY PLANNING AND POLICY INFLUENCE EXPERIENCES FROM NAMIBIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PARTICIPATORY PLANNING AND POLICY INFLUENCEEXPERIENCES FROM NAMIBIA PARTNERSHIP FOR ACTION CONFERENCE 15 AUGUST 2017 ANNA MULLER NAMIBIA HOUSING ACTION GROUP

  2. -1990Pre-independence Namibia • Pre-Independence Housing was a top-driven/political managed process- which started to embark on a market approach by developing and selling houses to the “Low-income” households (previously only rental housing) through a semi-state institute • Experiences in Namibia of communities participating in their own housing process started in 1987 when the first community came together in Windhoek to find solutions to their housing problems (overcrowded rental rooms – no informal settlements.

  3. Communities buying and developing blocks of land • Together, with the support service of Namibia Housing Action Group, they negotiated for affordable land where communities bought, planned and developed their own blocks of land • The first group bought and developed their land in 1992 • As part of the negotiations process the community collect their own information .

  4. Participatory Planning in Namibia • When the community initiated their own process, they designed their own house type and built a life size model for all the members to spatially experience the house they are dreaming off (34 sq meter plan) • The experience of the first group to embark on their own incremental housing developed inspired other communities to join leading to what became a national network in 1998 - the Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia – internationally linked through SDI to other country Federations

  5. 1991- 2000Government response to participatory initiatives • The first government program that recognised the community groups’ initiatives was the Build Together Programme (1992) where saving groups could borrow money as collectives to build their own houses through a self-managed process • The City of Windhoek sold blocks of land and also allowed the groups to use affordable planning and service levels on the condition that they maintain these themselves. By the end of the 1990s the City had a development and upgrading strategy in place to facilitate incremental development • The Flexible Land Tenure program, started in the mid 1990s consulted with the groups to develop a new Bill facilitating that communities could own land as collectives.

  6. 2001-2016 Informal settlements and backyard formation increased Landlessness and informal settlement formation increased to reach over 230 Informal settlements with over 150,000 households (25% of the population) The network of the Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia reached all the towns They enumerated the first informal settlement in Namibia and then communities started to do their own layouts They enumerated the first informal settlement in Namibia and then communities started to do their own layouts

  7. Participatory Planning start with participatory information collection : • Community Land Information Program (CLIP) • The profiling of informal settlements whereby informal settlement communities, Regional and Local Authorities, Ministries, academic institutions and NGOs - was nationalised with the encouragement of late Minister Pandeni in 2006 to address the lack of informal settlement information. Objectives: • Develop a planning and development process through information collection where the informal settlement households in Namibia can become active partners in their own settlement upgrading • Develop a local and national database which can assist government and other stakeholders to address informal settlement upgrading

  8. CLIP – informaation to plan for upgrading The second phase of CLIP focuses household socio-economic surveys and structure maps • When this phase started to focus on city wide data collection, the information assisted communities to negotiate for settlement upgrading • Communities prepare their own layouts with technical support from NHAG and professionals • Greenwell Matongo C obtain the rights to upgrade their own informal settlement in Windhoek in 2004

  9. Studio program with communities to plan for upgrading – • With the planning, land administration and architecture students of Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST) the community, students, lecturers and community started to plan together new layouts for the informal settlements • Gobabis People Square was the first informal settlement where the layouts were prepared and re-blocking took place • During the first studio the site was analyzed, all the features mapped. The students work with community teams amongst 8 blocks identified in the features of the site • A new layout was prepared: this involved the planning for “making streets” and providing each household with a plot of land, providing open spaces for amenities

  10. Lessons learned Learned from the existing practices: Communities cannot work in isolation, without the support and partnership with the Local Authorities and other stakeholders. Piloting is not sufficient – we need to plan for scaling up activities towards security of tenure and development rights

  11. 2001-2017Government Response to community processes • Updated housing policy includes the People’s Housing Process • Flexible Land Tenure Act of 2012 and regulations prepared • Mass Housing Program first phase implemented only contractor-built housing- excluding the urban poor • Review of the Mass Housing Programme aiming to become more inclusive – focusing on the 89% that cannot afford conventional housing – include community driven processes • Ministry participate in studios and learning and support community to install services • Participatory Slum Upgrading Program with UN Habitat

  12. The way forward: Proposal for Scaling-up • Scaling up security of tenure and housing opportunities through a partnership approachfocusing on co-production between organised communities, local and regional authorities, central government, and universities

  13. Strategy towards working in Partnership • Partnerships are formed to enable: - the scaling up of basic services, security of tenure and the construction of houses for low-income groups - the collaboration with the saving groups and informal settlement communities, encouraging their active participation in achieving their own development priorities - practical implementation - joining of resources - local ownership of the development • sharing and learning lessons to enable scaling up of the process – building capacity on different levels

  14. NHAG, NUST, Association of Local Authorities, Government and other stakeholders towards implementingNational Informal Settlement Upgrading • Stage one: Based on existing experience taking 3 years 2017-2020 learning and capacity building for strategy formulation and increase experiences and relevant curriculums for formal and informal learning and training (including students, employees and communities) while implementing in 13 regions • Stage Two: Full scale implementation 2020-2030 to cover all urban areas in Namibia

  15. Activities: • Learning while doing – forming studios and practical training during the implementation of 3 existing and 11 new study sites (informal settlements in 14 towns) within a three year period. • Plan full scale up on demand driven basis – where the local authority and community implement CLIP and agreed to upgrading

  16. Actions and outcomes include 1: Identification of learning sites 2: Information for development decisions 3: Locally driven settlement plans (Studios) 4: Secure tenure and basic service to enable housing development 5: Improved shelter 6 . Curricula for training developed 7: Strategy for National 10 year strategy in place

  17. End of Presentation Thank you accordingly.

More Related