1 / 22

The Prospect of Zero GHG Emission Cars

The Prospect of Zero GHG Emission Cars. Prof. David R. Hodas Widener University School of Law Wilmington DE Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation Symposium: LIVING ON A FINITE EARTH: Energy Law and Policy for a New Era October 10, 2008 School of Law University of Oregon.

melinda-oliver
Download Presentation

The Prospect of Zero GHG Emission Cars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Prospect of Zero GHG Emission Cars Prof. David R. Hodas Widener University School of Law Wilmington DE Journal of EnvironmentalLaw and Litigation Symposium: LIVING ON A FINITE EARTH: Energy Law and Policy for a New Era October 10, 2008 School of Law University of Oregon

  2. Vehicle weight vs.. acceleration • As engines become more efficient they have been used to increase acceleration and weight not increase fuel efficiency

  3. Transportation uses 70% of U.S. oil consumption • Last week (Oct 3) the U.S. imported (net of exports)12.9 million barrels of petroleum per day (gross imports were14 million)(this translates into > 4.7 billion bbls per year) • @$100/bll U.S the cost of these imports is about $1.29 billion per day or $470 billion per year. • U.S. consumes about 43% of the world’s gasoline (2003 data)

  4. In 2006 transportation in the U.S. cars account for 1.99 billion metric tons of CO2 emissions • Petroleum: 1.952 billion (gasoline’s share is 1.19 billion mt) • Electricity for transportation: 5.2 • Natural gas: 32.5 • U.S. electricity production from fossil fuels accounts for 2.344 billion tons of CO2 per year. • Together (3.534 billion mt), U.S. gasoline use and electricity generation comprise about 60% of U.S. CO2 emissions or just under 14% of global CO2 emissions

  5. Can we reduce CO2 from both electricity and transportation? • Only if we can shift to renewable sources of electricity • Renewable Electricity challenge: how to store it for use when needed? • Can Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) cars help meet the challenge?

  6. Plug-in Vehicles V2G Slides provided by Prof. Willett Kempton, University of Delaware

  7. Vehicle to Grid Arrows indicate direction of power flow

  8. V2G Basic Math • Average car driven 1 hour/day, thus, time parked is 23 hours/day; Daily average travel: 32 miles, storage for 100 - 250 miles • Practical power draw from car: 10 - 20 kW • US power: generation=978 GW; load=436 GW avg (EIA) • US 241 million cars (FHWA 2005) x 15 kW = 3,615 GW, thus... • Power of fleet is >3x generation; >8x load !

  9. Electric Markets • Initial markets (high value, low impact on battery, no system changes): • Regulation (“Frequency regulation”) • Spinning reserves • Intrahour adjustment • Larger but more challenging markets • Peak power • UPS for the distribution system

  10. Daily Load versus Regulation (=correction of ACE) ACE, Area Control Error, ~0.5% of control area load Grid operators send frequent signals to on-line generators (equipped with AGC) to either increase or decrease output. MW Aggregate Daily Load Curve Time of Day from Letendre et al 2006

  11. Average Annual Market Clearing Prices: Regulation January 30, 2008

  12. Average Annual Market Clearing Prices: Spinning Reserves

  13. Basic per Vehicle Values 10 –Year Present Value V2G Revenue Potential Assumptions: 80% availability, Reg. $40/MW-h, Spin. $10/MW-h, 7% discount rate, example calculations

  14. Vehicle Monitoring • Automated data collection while grid-connected and while driving • Power from grid to vehicle (-kW) and from vehicle to grid (+kW) • AGC regulation signal from PJM (+-kW) • State of charge (%) • Wind backup: wind output vs. modelled vehicle fleet charge/discharge

  15. EV/PHEV Design Tradeoffs • Batteries expensive; motor expensive • High line-current gives fast charge, roadside recharge; adds only moderate cost if done right • Regulation income directly proportional to line power! • Line power limits: • Size of plug, circuit, service • Energy/time = kWh/dispatch

  16. How many cars for an A/S contract? • PJM minimum A/S contract: 1 MW • CalISO minimum A/S contract: 1 MW • Assume 2/3 availability (1/3 unavailable because driving, battery at wrong SOC, etc • Calculation: 2/3 availability means ... ___ kW/car * ___ cars * 2/3 = ___ MW • for 1 MW at 15 kW, need 100 cars • for 1 MW at 1.5 kW, need 1000 cars

  17. Vision • One-half vehicle fleet is electric drive (BEV + PHEV). National security & environment benefits. • Lots of storage on the electric system, near loads. • Electric system storage is dispatchable by ISO/TSO and/or load serving entity. • Electric grid is more stable and reliable, A/S is abundant and less expensive • Intermittent renewables can be a much higher fraction of the generation mix.

  18. Legal and Policy Questions • How shift investment strategy in a deregulated electric system to renewable electricity linked to V2G • Infrastructure: parking lots, transmission capacity, distribution networks • Federal or state regulation? Link to climate change incentives, caps • Smart meter laws, aggregation design • Contract and business plan design, taxation, ownership, utility integration • Other potential issues?

  19. Mid-Atlantic Grid-Interactive Car Consortium • Partners • University of Delaware • PHI: Delmarva Power, Atlantic Electric, PEPCO, etc • ACUA • PJM • AC Propulsion • Comverge • Observers • Tesla Motors • Google.org • State of Delaware (DEDO, PSC, Energy Office) • anon http://www.magicconsortium.org

More Related