1 / 13

Positive Action & EC Law

Positive Action & EC Law. prof. dr. Marc De Vos. Purpose. Positive action acquis in gender Positive action in the Race and Ethnic Origin Directive & Framework Directive Possible avenues for development Not: disability, international human rights law & MS experience. What is PA?.

mieko
Download Presentation

Positive Action & EC Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Positive Action&EC Law prof. dr. Marc De Vos prof. dr. M. De Vos

  2. Purpose • Positive action acquis in gender • Positive action in the Race and Ethnic Origin Directive & Framework Directive • Possible avenues for development • Not: disability, international human rights law & MS experience prof. dr. M. De Vos

  3. What is PA? • No definition – More a process than a concept • “Any measure contributing to the elimination of equalities in practice” • Discrimination in EC Law: • “the application of different rules to comparable situations, or the application of the same rules to different situations” prof. dr. M. De Vos

  4. What is PA? • Elements: • Promoting substantive equality: outcome v. opportunity • Group consideration v. individual merit • Harbours a whole range of potential measures • State or private actors - From encouragement (facilitation, promotion, outreach, accommodation, diversity) to reverse discrimination and soft or hard quotas prof. dr. M. De Vos

  5. Art. 2(4) original Equal Treatment Directive • “This Directive shall be without prejudice to measures to promote equal opportunitiesfor men and women, in particular by removing existing inequalitieswhich affect women’s opportunities” • Seen as an exception rather than as a clarification to equality: ECJ development prof. dr. M. De Vos

  6. Art. 141(4) TEC & amended and recast Equal Treatment Directive • “With a view of ensuring full equality in practicebetween men and women in working life, the principle of equal treatment shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or adopting measures providing for specific advantages in order to make it easier for the under-represented sex to pursue a vocational activity or to prevent or compensate for disadvantages in professional careers.” prof. dr. M. De Vos

  7. ECJ - General • Only a small fraction of PA is liable to generate conflict with EC law: reverse discrimination • ECJ has not (yet) widened the scope for PA under 141(4) TEC • No general duty of PA implicit in non-discrimination to avoid negative impact: indirect discrimination & its justification (Bilka) prof. dr. M. De Vos

  8. ECJ & Positive discrimination • Formal equality is the rule, positive discrimination the narrow exception • Objective contents: • Objectively address occupational difficulties of women • Clear and unambiguous criteria • Proven and genuine group imbalance, even it the favoured individual is not harmed by it • Appropriate and necessary PA – proportionality • No automatic quotas prof. dr. M. De Vos

  9. Art. 5 D2000/43 and Art. 7.1 D2000/78 • “With a view of ensuring full equality in practice(between men and women in working life), the principle of equal treatment shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or adopting specific measures(providing for specific advantages in order to make it easier for the under-represented sex to pursue a vocational activity or) to prevent or compensate for disadvantages (in professional careers) linked to any of the grounds.” prof. dr. M. De Vos

  10. Analysis • Textual comparison • Very similar • More restrictive: no specific advantages • More extensive: any specific measure and any disadvantage • Genesis of the 2000 Directives • Recast Directive 2006/54 prof. dr. M. De Vos

  11. Avenues of Development • Marginal evolution in concept • Big evolution in scope: • Beyond employment + beyond gender • Combination of PA, reasonable accommodation, indirect discrimination, and genuine and determining occupational requirements • The scope is likely to influence the ECJ’s scrutiny prof. dr. M. De Vos

  12. The Key: Proportionality • Legitimate aim: • May vary with the ground • Objective contents • Effective: • Proven and genuine imbalance – How much? Where? Gradual reduction or just temporary? • How effective? • Necessary: Alternatives? Cost/benefit? prof. dr. M. De Vos

  13. Contact Infomarc.devos@ugent.be+32 9 264 68 43 prof. dr. M. De Vos

More Related