1.19k likes | 1.38k Views
2. Who We Are BDMP/Westport. Berry , Dunn, McNeil
E N D
1. 1
Options for Supporting Primary Care Louisiana Office of Primary Care and Rural Health
2. 2 Who We AreBDMP/Westport Berry , Dunn, McNeil & Parker is the largest CPA firm in the New England Region
Westport Group merged with BDMP in 2000 and became BDMP/Westport
National practice specializing in programs that focus on the underserved
Rural Health Clinics
Community Health Centers
Federally Qualified Health Centers
Critical Access Hospitals
Other Hospitals
Network Development
3. 3 What We DoBDMP/Westport Focus on programs that enhance reimbursement
Assist providers in the determination of which programs best meet local needs
Assist communities in the development of strategies to maximize resources for the community
4. 4 Options for Supporting Primary Care Why is This Topic Important? The number of options has increased (>ten)
There is no one “right” option for a state or a community or an institution—“It Depends….”
Requirements and benefits of each option are becoming more complex
Options are being pursued by multiple provider types
Resources are more limited—hard to support
Opportunities may be time limited
Number of un and under insured are increasing
5. 5 Options for Supporting Primary Care Why is This important in Louisiana? LHA recommends the development of a “decentralized, community-based approach to care for the indigent and uninsured”
43% of physicians enrolled in Medicaid do not submit claims
LHA recommends “an aggressive and state supported effort to develop CHCs/FQHCs as a complement to LSU clinics wherever possible”
Act 162 directs the “reorganization of the delivery of medical care so that rural hospitals become centers of primary and preventive health delivery and medical services”
6. 6 Options for Supporting Primary Care Why is This important in Louisiana? 16 hospitals are eligible for CAH status
11 have converted
10 are actively considering conversion
27 current Federally Qualified Health Centers
17 core sites
10 satellite clinics
31 new FQHCs planned
19 new starts
12 expansions
6 Public Health Unit conversions (included in new starts and expansions)
49 Rural Health Clinics
Are any of these in MUPs?
Some HPSAs were last updated in 1988
Facility HPSA designation is new—requires fee discounts
7. 7
8. 8 What This Workshop Will Do Provide an overview of several options
Describe what benefits are available
Describe what you have to do to access benefits
Describe why some options might not work for you
May confuse you!!
May result in information overload….
9. 9 What This Workshop Will NOT Do Provide you with a
specific answer
for your organization
or your community
10. 10 Options for Supporting Primary Care Overview-Types of Models Hospital Based
Outpatient department of a hospital <100 beds
Outpatient department of a hospital >100 beds
CAH outpatient department electing all inclusive payments
CAH outpatient department not electing all inclusive payments
Rural Health Clinics
Freestanding
Provider based in hospitals with >50 beds
Provider based in hospitals with <50 beds
Community Health Centers
Public Entity FQHC/CHC
Federally Qualified Health Centers
FQHC Grantees
FQHC Look Alikes
11. 11 Options for Supporting Primary Care Overview-Specifics of Each Model Medicare reimbursement
Medicaid reimbursement
Eligibility criteria
Basic requirements for participation
Other benefits (grants, drug pricing, malpractice coverage)
12. 12 Summary of Model Types
13. 13 Background for Model Types History of program development
Types of shortage area designations
Description of provider based requirements
14. 14 HistoryPrograms That Support Primary Care 1960s—CHC (Community Health Centers)
Grant funding (PHS Act Section 330) to support rural and urban access. This provider type must be a nonprofit
corporation or public entity.
1970s—RHC (Rural Health Clinics)
Cost-based Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement to support
midlevel providers and access. This provider type may
be provider-based, freestanding or sole proprietor.
1980s—FQHC (Federally Qualified Health Centers)
Cost-based Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement for
CHCs. This provider type must be a nonprofit corporation.
15. 15 HistoryHospitals and Primary Care
1980s-1990s
Hospitals acquire primary care practices
Hospital practices seek RHC designation to enhance
reimbursement and financial viability
1990s
80% of hospital-owned practices lose money
BBA 1997 establishes CAH (Critical Access Hospital)
CAHs own provider-based RHCs
Present
Hospitals divest practices and form CHCs/FQHCs
CHC program doubles in number of sites
16. 16 Shortage Area Requirements
17. 17 A provider-based entity is a provider of health care services, or an RHC as defined in Sec. 405.2401(b) of this chapter, that is either created by, or acquired by, a main provider for the purpose of furnishing health care services of a different type from those of the main provider under the name, ownership, and administration and financial control of the main provider, in accordance with the provisions of this section. A provider-based entity comprises both the specific physical facility that serves as the site of services of a type for which payment could be claimed under the Medicare or Medicaid program, and the personnel and equipment needed to deliver the services at that facility. A provider-based entity may, by itself, be qualified to participate in Medicare as a provider under Sec. 489.2 of this chapter, and Medicare conditions of participation do apply to a provider-based entity as an independent entity. Provider-Based Status Definition
18. 18 Provider-Based Entities May Include:
Department of the provider
A remote location of the provider
Satellite of the provider
Must Conform to the Following:
Licensure
Clinical services
Financial integration
Public awareness
Obligations of hospital-based entities
Operation under ownership and control of the main provider
Administration and supervision
Location Provider-Based Status Requirements
19. 19 Operates under the same licensure
Except where a state requires a separate license, or
State law does not permit licensure of the provider and the entity under a single license Licensure
20. 20 Clinical Services Professional staff have clinical privileges at the main provider
Same monitoring and oversight
Same reporting relationship – frequency, intensity, accountability
Same supervision and accountability
Medical staff committees are responsible for the entity
QA, utilization review, coordination and service integration
Medical records are integrated
Unified retrieval system, or cross referenced
Services are integrated to assure continuity of care
21. 21 Financial Integration
Shared income and expenses
Cost reported in a cost center of the provider
Financial data integrated into the provider’s trial balance
22. 22 Public Awareness
The provider-based entity is held out to the public as part of the main provider
Patients know they will be billed as part of the main provider
23. 23 Obligations of Hospital-Based Entities
Operation under ownership and control
100% owned by the provider
Have the same governing body
Operated under same organizational documents – bylaws
Main provider has final approval of contracts, personnel
actions, personnel policies, medical staff appointments
24. 24 Obligations of Hospital-Based Entities (cont’d) Administration and supervision
The entity is under the direct supervision of the main
provider
Same monitoring and oversight
Billing
Records
Human resources
Payroll
Benefits
Salary structure
Purchasing services
25. 25 Obligations of Hospital-Based Entities (cont’d) Location
35 mile rule
Exceptions for DSH (11.75%), State or local government facilities
Or facilities contracted by State or local government
Unless
At least 75% of entity patients reside in the same zip code areas as at least 75% of the main provider’s patients, or
At least 75% of the entity’s patients who require care as of the type provided by the main provider receive care from the main provider
RHCs are not subject to the 75-75 rule
26. 26 Hospital Based Model Department of Hospital >100 Beds Medicare reimbursement
Outpatient Prospective Payment based on APCs
(For most services. There are still some fee schedule services)
27. 27 Hospital Based Model Department of Hospital >100 Beds Medicaid reimbursement
Prospective Payment Mechanism (?)
28. 28 Reimbursement Calculations
29. 29 Hospital Based Model Department of Hospital >100 Beds
30. 30 Hospital Based Model Department of Hospital <100 Beds
31. 31 Hospital Based Model Department of Hospital <100 Beds Medicaid reimbursement
Prospective Payment Mechanism
Small rurals - 83% of cost plus DSH
32. 32 Hospital Based Model Department of Hospital <100 Beds
33. 33 Hospital Based ModelDepartment of CAH Electing All Inclusive Payment Medicare reimbursement
All-inclusive billing consisting of:
Technical component reimbursed at cost, plus
Professional component reimbursed at 115% of the Medicare fee schedule
Does not apply to departments with a unique provider numbers (e.g.RHC, HHA)
34. 34 Hospital Based ModelDepartment of CAH Electing All Inclusive Payment Medicaid reimbursement
Presently 83% of cost with DSH reimbursement closing the gap between prospective payment and cost
May be moving to cost based reimbursement
35. 35 Hospital Based ModelDepartment of CAH Electing All Inclusive Payment
36. 36 Hospital Based Model—Department of CAH NOT Electing All Inclusive Payment Medicare reimbursement
Split billing consisting of:
Technical component reimbursed at cost, billed to Fiscal Intermediary
Professional component reimbursed at the Medicare fee schedule, billed to the Part B Carrier
Does not apply to departments with a unique provider number (e.g. RHC, HHA)
37. 37 Hospital Based Model—Department of CAH NOT Electing All Inclusive Payment Medicaid reimbursement
Presently 83% of cost with DSH reimbursement closing the gap between prospective payment and cost
May be moving to cost based reimbursement
38. 38 Reimbursement Calculations
39. 39 Hospital Based Model—Department of CAH NOT Electing All Inclusive Payment
40. 40 Rural Health ClinicFreestanding Medicare reimbursement
All-inclusive reimbursement rate, capped at $66.72 in CY 2003
Payments = 80% rate + 20% RHC’s charges
Payments are made only for face-to-face encounters with physicians, midlevel practitioners, licensed clinical social workers and clinical psychologists
Fee schedule payments for lab, x-ray, hospital, skilled nursing facility services
41. 41 Rural Health ClinicFreestanding Medicaid reimbursement
Prospectively determined all-inclusive reimbursement rate
Based on historic Medicaid costs for 1999 and 2000, increased by the Medicare Economic Index (2.2% to 3.0% annually), or
Based on other clinics’ rates in the area
Payments are made for face-to-face encounters with covered Medicaid providers included in the State Plan
42. 42 Reimbursement Calculations
43. 43 Rural Health ClinicFreestanding
44. 44 Eligibility criteria
Employment of MLPs
Midlevel practitioners:
Physician Assistant
Nurse Practitioner
Certified Nurse Midwife
Must be available to see patients at least 50% of the time the practice is open to see patients
RHCs located on islands are exempt from employing MLPs
RHCs that lose MLP staff can obtain a waiver for one year Rural Health ClinicFreestanding
45. 45 Corporate Status
Eligibility criteria
Corporate status
Nonprofit
For-profit
Sole proprietor or partnership
Owned by another organization
46. 46 Rural Health ClinicFreestanding Eligibility criteria
Other issues
Four walls test (RHC must be contained within four walls)
Extensive policy manual
Clinical protocols
Primarily in the business of primary care
Provide six basic lab tests
Quality Improvement Program
Annual program evaluation
47. 47 Shortage Area Requirements
Must be LOCATED IN a Qualifying Shortage Area
MUA
HPSA (primary care only)
HPSP
MUP – No longer qualifies for RHC status
Governor designation (specific to RHC program)
New RHCs must be located in an area with a current (<3 years old) shortage area designation
Current RHCs granted facility HPSA status (12/02 - Health Care Safety Net Amendments)—RHC status protected if HPSA is lost Rural Health ClinicFreestanding
48. 48 Rural Health ClinicFreestanding Other Benefits
12/02 - Health Care Safety Net Amendments authorized grants (about $50,000) for training and technology in underserved areas
No appropriation yet—maybe next year
49. 49 Rural Health Clinic Provider Based in Hospitals >50 Beds Medicare reimbursement
All-inclusive reimbursement rate, capped ($66.72 for 2003)
Payments = 80% rate + 20% RHC’s charges
Payments are made only for face-to-face encounters with physicians, midlevel practitioners, licensed clinical social workers and clinical psychologists
Fee schedule payments for lab, x-ray, hospital, skilled nursing facility services
50. 50 Rural Health Clinic Provider Based in Hospitals >50 Beds Medicaid reimbursement
Prospectively determined all-inclusive reimbursement rate
Based on historic Medicaid costs for 1999 and 2000, increased by the Medicare Economic Index (2.2% to 3.0% annually), or
Based on other clinics’ rates in the area
Payments are made for face-to-face encounters with covered Medicaid providers included in the State Plan
51. 51 Reimbursement Calculations
52. 52
53. 53 Rural Health Clinic Provider Based in Hospitals <50 Beds Medicare reimbursement
All-inclusive reimbursement rate, uncapped
Payments = 80% rate + 20% RHC’s charges
Payments are made only for face-to-face encounters with physicians, midlevel practitioners, licensed clinical social workers and clinical psychologists
Fee schedule payments for lab, x-ray, hospital, skilled nursing facility services
54. 54 Rural Health Clinic Provider Based in Hospitals <50 Beds Medicaid reimbursement
Prospectively determined all-inclusive reimbursement rate
Based on historic Medicaid costs for 1999 and 2000, increased by the Medicare Economic Index (2.2% to 3.0% annually), or
Based on other clinics’ rates in the area
Payments are made for face-to-face encounters with covered Medicaid providers included in the State Plan
55. 55 Reimbursement Calculations
56. 56 Rural Health ClinicProvider Based in Hospitals <50 Beds Eligibility criteria
Same as provider based >50 Beds
Shortage area requirements
Same as provider based >50 Beds
Other benefits
Same as provider based >50 Beds
57. 57 Community Health Center (FQHC Grant Funded) Medicare reimbursement
All-inclusive reimbursement rate, capped (Rural - $89.06, Urban - $103.58 for 2003)
Payments = 80% rate + 20% CHC’s charges
Payments are made only for face-to-face encounters with physicians, midlevel practitioners, licensed clinical social workers and clinical psychologists
Fee schedule payments for lab, x-ray, hospital, skilled nursing facility services
58. 58 Community Health Center Medicaid reimbursement
Prospectively determined all-inclusive reimbursement rate
Based on historic Medicaid costs for 1999 and 2000, increased by the Medicare Economic Index (2.2% to 3.0% annually), or
Based on other CHCs’ rates in the area
Payments are made for face-to-face encounters with covered Medicaid providers included in the State Plan
59. 59 Reimbursement Calculations
60. 60 Community Health Centers
Receive grant funding under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act
Goal of the CHC program
To maintain, expand and improve the availability and
accessibility of essential primary and preventive health
care services and related “enabling” services provided to
low-income, medically underserved and vulnerable
populations that traditionally have limited access to
affordable services and face the greatest barriers to care
61. 61 Community Health Centers As fundamental components of the health care “safety net,” CHCs provide a comprehensive system of care reflective of the community’s needs and available to all persons residing in their service area(s), regardless of the person’s or family’s ability to pay for such services.
62. 62 Community Health Centers CHCs further ensure access to care by establishing a schedule of discounts for persons unable to pay a full fee, including nominal or no fees for services provided to the poorest of the populations served, persons whose incomes are below 100% of the Federal poverty guidelines.
63. 63 Community Health Centers One of the cornerstones of the CHC program is community involvement in both the management and governance of the health center. The CHC must be governed by a community-based Board of Directors, a majority of whom are users of the health center’s services and who represent the health center’s service area in terms of demographic factors such as race, ethnicity and gender.
64. 64 Community Health Centers
The Board must autonomously exercise key decision-making regarding operating and service policies, approval of the budget and grant application, strategic and operational planning and the hiring of the executive director or chief executive officer. In addition, the involvement of third parties in health center governance is specifically limited by Federal policy.
65. 65 CHC Qualifying Shortage Designations Must serve an MUA/MUP designated population
(differs from RHC which must be located in)
HPSA/HPSP does not qualify
Governor designation (Exceptional MUP)
No time limit on shortage area designation
66. 66 CHC Basic Eligibility Criteria Rural or urban
Must provide a sliding fee discount plan
Must prove need for the FQHC in the area
Other CHC requirements (program expectations)
Not required to employ an MLP
67. 67 CHC Corporate Eligibility Criteria Must be 501(c)(3) nonprofit (hospital divest practice)
May not be owned/operated by another entity
Must have a consumer controlled board
Between nine to 25 members
Users = 50%
Self perpetuating
< 50% of non-users may derive >10% income from
health care
Must represent the population served
May not include employees or relatives of employees
Tribal programs are exempted from governance
requirements
Can set aside a limited number of seats to be filled by another organization (hospital)
68. 68 CHC Board Responsibilities Define/preserve the mission of the organization
Make policy
Safeguard the assets of the center
Select, evaluate and support the CEO
Monitor/evaluate center and board performance
Plan for the long-range future of the center
69. 69 CHC Sliding Fee Scale Sliding fee program
Required for users = 200% FPL
Apply to all required services
Medicare annual deductible
Waived
Medicare co-insurance
20% of charge
70. 70 CHC Staffing CEO must be employed by the CHC
Other key management personnel preferred to be employed, but can be contracted:
CFO
Medical Director
Chief Information Officer
Clinical staffing as appropriate for service delivery
Must employ “core staff” of providers
Other clinical staff may be contracted
Administrative/support staff may be contracted
71. 71 CHC Required Services
Provide directly, through contract, or through documented arrangements—regardless of ability to pay
Primary care by physicians and/or MLPs
Family medicine
Internal medicine
Pediatrics
Obstetrics/gynecology
Diagnostic laboratory and radiology services
72. 72 CHC Required Services (Cont’d) Preventive health services
Prenatal and perinatal services
Screening for breast and cervical cancer
Well-child services
Immunizations against vaccine-preventable diseases
Screenings for elevated blood lead levels, communicable
diseases and cholesterol
Pediatric eye, ear and dental screenings
Voluntary family planning services
Preventive dental services
Mental health/substance abuse
73. 73 CHC Required Services (Cont’d) Emergency medical services
Pharmaceutical services as may be appropriate for the health center
Referrals to providers of medical services and other health related services
Patient case management including a system for tracking and follow-up
74. 74 CHC Required Services (Cont’d) Enabling services
Outreach
Transportation
Language interpretation if a substantial number of patients are of limited English proficiency
Education regarding the availability and proper use of health services
75. 75 CHC Benefits Access to CHC grants
Access to 340B Low Cost Drug Program
FTCA malpractice coverage for grantees
(not for FQHC Look-Alikes)
Support for outpatient programs at risk
Support for other services (i.e., mental health, dental, specialty services)
Tool for network development
76. 76 Access to CHC Grants National goal of creating 1,200 new or expanded CHCs
New Access Point grants are capped at $650,000
Expansions of current grantees eligible for additional funding
Grants renewed annually
Statewide strategic plan for CHC growth
77. 77 Types of CHC Grants Community Health Centers
Migrant Health Centers
Homeless Health Centers
Public Housing Health Centers
School-Based Health Centers
78. 78 340B Low Cost Drug Program Section 602 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 enacted section 340B
Allows eligible providers to:
Purchase prescription and non-prescription medications at or below Medicaid costs
Add a dispensing fee
Pass savings on to users of the CHC
79. 79 340B Program (Cont’d) Eligible providers (partial list):
Community Health Centers
Migrant Health Centers
Homeless Health Centers
Public Housing Health Centers
School-Based Health Centers
HIV/AIDS projects
Tribal Health Centers
Urban Indian Health Centers
Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics
Tuberculosis Clinics
Title X Family Planning Clinics
Federally Qualified Health Center Look-Alikes
Disproportionate Share Hospitals that exceed 11.75%
80. 80 340B Implementation
Access to discounted pharmaceuticals may be provided through:
In-house pharmacy
Contracts with local pharmacy
Arrangements with remote centralized pharmacy
Other innovation arrangements
81. 81 FTCA Coverage for CHCs
Federal Tort Claims Act covers Federal employees
Malpractice coverage for:
Employees
Clinical staff
Some contractors
Board members
82. 82 Support for Outpatient Programs at Risk
CHC model encourages integration of other health services into the CHC
Family planning agencies
Maternal and child health programs
Public health
Ancillary services, such as podiatry
Others
May be some confusion about specialty providers in CHCs
83. 83 Support for Other Services
Any service that is a covered service in the state Medicaid plan must be reimbursed on the basis of cost in the CHC/FQHC
84. 84 CHC Ownership of Other Entities
CHC may own and operate other businesses:
Home health
Durable medical equipment
Meals on Wheels
Daycare
Critical Access Hospitals
Other….
85. 85 CHC Networks Preference is for multiple site networks
Can add new sites to networks
Preference is to “expand” existing grantees
86. 86 Negotiating With Other Providers Identify area providers that might be included in a CHC
Meet with them and explain the CHC program
Offer to include them in a CHC “preliminary analysis”
Shows financial impact
Shows what has to change to access new dollars
Proprietary information can usually be kept confidential
Will recommend which study participants are good CHC
member candidates
Share preliminary report with participants
Decide who is in and who is out
Toughest issue:
Formerly private providers becoming employees
87. 87 CHC Application Process See PIN 2003-01
Complete Need for Assistance Scoring
Identify organizations to be included
Assure compliance with requirements
Must be operational within 90 days of grant award
Prepare grant (comprehensive and complex)
Grant application deadlines (to be announced)
November
February
April
Awards usually 90 days after application date
Must submit annual grant application
88. 88 Hospital Support of CHC/FQHCs Hospitals may continue to provide financial support
OIG guidelines for terms of support
Be careful about anti-kickback regulations
89. 89 Trends in CHC/FQHC Development Hospitals are anxious to move practices off their balance sheets
RHCs converting to FQHCs
Existing FQHC adding new sites
Hospitals developing FQHC networks
Small hospitals becoming FQHCs that own hospitals
Vertically integrated FQHC networks
90. 90 Hospitals and CHC/FQHCs Due to historical tension between CHCs and hospitals, many hospitals are not familiar with either the FQHC or CHC options for supporting primary care
Hospitals that were familiar with the FQHC program were not necessarily interested due to strict governance requirements for an independent corporation
91. 91 Public Entity CHCs A CHC must be a 501(c)(3) or a public entity
Public entity must meet all Section 330 requirements, or
Public entity must have a co-applicant board that meets
the Section 330 requirements
Public entity in a co-applicant arrangement may
Retain general policy setting functions and authorities
Establish personnel policies
Develop management and control systems
Approval of CHC budget
Others
Public entity can “share” authorities with board
Approval of budget
Approval of CEO
Others
92. 92 Public Entity CHC/FQHCs A “public entity” may become a CHC/FQHC if:
A. The public entity meets all Section 330 requirements (including governance)
OR
B. The public entity partners with a “co-applicant” entity and together these two entities meet Section 330 requirements
Under Option B, the public entity must have a co-applicant board that meets Section 330 requirement, but the public entity may:
Participate in joint decision making that precedes board approval (ie, also approves the budget)
93. 93 Public Entity Authorities The Public Entity may retain authority for the following personnel issues:
Personnel policies and procedures
Staff selection and dismissal procedures
Salary and benefit scales
Employee grievance procedures
Equal employment opportunity practices
94. 94 Public Entity Authorities The Public Entity may retain authority for the following fiscal issues:
Develop management and control systems
Provision of the annual audit
Approval of the CHC/FQHC budget
Development of systems for fee discount eligibility determination
Bill and collection policies (including partial payment)
Long range financial planning
The Public Entity may retain other decision making authorities as justified in the application and approved by the BPHC
95. 95 Federally Qualified Health Center FQHC Look Alikes Medicare reimbursement
All-inclusive reimbursement rate, capped (Rural - $89.06, Urban - $103.58 for 2003)
Payments = 80% rate + 20% CHC’s charges
Payments are made only for face-to-face encounters with physicians, midlevel practitioners, licensed clinical social workers and clinical psychologists
Fee schedule payments for lab, x-ray, hospital, skilled nursing facility services
96. 96 Federally Qualified Health Center FQHC Look Alikes Medicaid reimbursement
Prospectively determined all-inclusive reimbursement rate
Based on historic Medicaid costs for 1999 and 2000, increased by the Medicare Economic Index (2.2% to 3.0% annually), or
Based on other CHCs’ rates in the area
Payments are made for face-to-face encounters with covered Medicaid providers included in the State Plan
97. 97 Federally Qualified Health Centers
Community Health Centers (“grantees”) have automatic FQHC status
Receive grant funds and cost reimbursement
FQHC “Look-Alike”
Meet all the requirements of CHC
Do not receive grant funds, but may be given preference
for funding
Eligible for cost reimbursement
Eligible for 340B
Tribal Outpatient Programs are eligible to receive FQHC cost reimbursement
98. 98 When Look Alikes Don’t
Community Health Centers (“grantees”) have 90 days from grant award to become “fully operational”
Example: The transfer of hospital-owned practices will occur upon approval
FQHC Look-Alikes must be fully operational at the time of application
Example: The transfer of hospital-owned practices must be a done deal at the time of application
No more “wanna be”
Look Alikes do not qualify for FTCA coverage
??Other areas----maybe
99. 99 FQHC Look Alike Process Complete a Look-Alike application
New DRAFT application is being used
Not a competitive process
Not “if”, but “when”
Plan on 12 months for approval!!!!
The less you look like the expected model, the longer approval will take
Must recertify annually
Sometimes it makes sense to “dual track” a look alike and grant application
100. 100 Why Not CHC/FQHC? Control
What price control?
It is a complex process
Get some help
CAH grants
State resources
State primary care association
101. 101 Summary Comparison
102. 102 Comparison of Benefits
103. 103 Summary of Model Types
104. 104 Reimbursement Methodologies
105. 105 National Political Environment Very strong support for CHCs
Two national studies to investigate hospital/CHC opportunities
CHCs are very leery of hospitals
Significant changes at HRSA (increased tensions)
Difficult to have successful CHC grant without PCA/PCO support
Never propose a new CHC/FQHC in competition with an existing CHC/FQHC
106. 106 Potential Threats to Hospitals CAHs and small hospitals are concerned about CHCs moving into their communities and “competing”
CHCs can provide ancillary diagnostic testing
CHCs can own CAHs (and other businesses)
107. 107 How to Negotiate Meet and talk
Recognize that each organization is a local “safety net” provider
CHCs have grant funding to support services to uninsured, which relieves strain on hospital ER
Hospitals provide emergency services that would be
difficult for CHCs to provide
Develop a community-wide strategy for the care and nurturing of all safety net providers
Meeting of board members will likely be more effective than meetings of just organizational leaders
108. 108 A New Philosophy If we are to maximize the resources and services available to the people we are committed to serving, then we have to start thinking at the community level—not the organizational level.
We challenge you to be willing to go out of business if that is the best strategy for your community.
109. 109 Case Study – HAN
FQHC Community Network
The players include:
A freestanding RHC
A provider based RHC
A private podiatry practice
A fee-for-service OB/GYN practice
110. 110 Case Study – HAN (Cont’d) Conversion to FQHC network
Combined four practices had an annual budget of
$2,252,000
A Medicare/Medicaid mix of 47%
Financial impact of FQHC reimbursement
$318,000 from Medicare and Medicaid
Hospital is a CAH – Impact $22,000
They have a pending 330 CHC grant
$650,000 per year
Another expansion grant is likely in two or three years
Expanded Mental and Dental Health grant is likely
Total annual grant funds totaling $2 Million in five years
111. 111 Case Study – RHC, Inc. FQHC Community Network
The players include:
A freestanding RHC
Four hospital sponsored primary care practices
Combined deficit for the five practices – ($580,000)
Conversion to FQHC network
Financial Impact of FQHC reimbursement
$149,000 for four hospital sponsored practices
$ 87,000 for RHC
Total of $236,000, leaving a deficit of ($344,000)
112. 112 Case Study – RHC, Inc. (Cont’d)
Received a 330 New Start annual grant of $650,000
Expanded services
Increased users
113. 113 Case Study – DEHC Convert six freestanding primary care practices to CAH provider based
The players include:
A pediatrics practice
Three internal medicine practices
An OB/GYN practice
A general surgery practice
Impact greatest for the pediatrics practice – $107,000
Average impact for internists – $25,000
Surgery practice impact – $37,000
OB/GYN impact, decrease – ($11,000)
114. 114 Case Study – DEHC (Cont’d) Convert a freestanding RHC to CAH provider based
Single physician and MLP
Impact is $17,000
Studies consider impact on existing CAH reimbursement
115. 115 Case Study – CHWCGT Proposed conversion of small fee-for-service practice to FQHC
Small hospital sponsored (barely) practice
395 visits in five months – 948 annualized
FQHC reimbursement impact – $9,100 five months, $21,820 annualized
Practice needs to grow
Will submit a 330 New Start grant in April…..stay tuned
116. 116 Case Study – OGH Conversion of four provider-based primary care practices to FQHC status
The players include:
Four primary care practices in a University Primary Care network
33,370 annual visits
Financial impact of FQHC
At current levels – ($9,900) decrease
With increase in Medicaid managed care @ 50% – $104,000 (Includes wrap-around payments)
117. 117 Case Study – AMG of MCH Comparison of freestanding RHC, provider based RHC and provider based department reimbursement
The existing practice was a freestanding fee-for-service
family practice
The financial impact by status compared with FFS
Freestanding RHC – $4,900
Provider based RHC – $52,100
Provider based department of hospital – $42,000
118. 118 Evaluation Form
119. 119