1 / 16

R ole and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case

This article explores the definition, challenges, and potential of small and medium-sized urban areas (SMUAs) in Latvia. It highlights the economic, demographic, and environmental issues faced by these areas and discusses the national spatial development perspective and regional policy in addressing these challenges. The role and potential of international, national, regional, and local centers are also highlighted, along with the policy approach in strengthening urban areas.

milleramber
Download Presentation

R ole and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areasLatvia’s case Indra Ciuksa The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development 04.12.2014.

  2. Definition of SMUAs • No common definition at EU level - multiple definitions are in use: • New OECD-EC definition is 50-100 thousand inhabitants for small cities, 100-250 thousand - for medium sized cities; • ESPON TOWN project – below 50 thousand inhabitants for small and medium sized urban areas • Different situation in Member States • depends from size, administrative division, historical and cultural context

  3. Urban areas in Latvia • 77 citiesandtowns, including: • 9 republican cities – more than 20 thousand inhabitants • 5 cities – more than 50 thousand inhabitants • 21 regional centres – 5 to 20 thousand inhabitants • Largest city – Riga more than 640 thousand inhabitants • Smallest town – Durbe 527 inhabitants • Urban areas cover 11% of all the country • Degree of urbanisation – 68 %

  4. Monocentric development tendencies Income tax per inhabitant in local municipalities budget

  5. Balanced network of centres – potential for polycentric development

  6. Remarkable regional development disparities 5th largest regional disparities in EU-28 (dispersion of regional GDP per inhabitant in NUTS 3 regions) BUT One of the fastest growing economies in EU Since 2000 Latvia has a highest GDP growth rate (5,6%)

  7. Republican cities demonstrates higher growth potential

  8. Challenges of Latvia’s development centres • Economical and social: • high unemployment, increasing poverty rate • insufficient business environment and infrastructure, need for new jobs • lackof skilled labour that could meet the labour market needs • Demographic: • population decline, including children and young people, brain drain • ageing population, need to review the service network of local governments, etc. • Environmental and climate: • deprived and contaminated territories in former industrial areas, • low energy efficiency of buildings, poor condition of heating networks that causes high heat losses • incomplete use of centralized water supply services, in some cases outdated infrastructure networks

  9. Regional policy in Latvia • Development planning and policy documents: • Sustainable Development Strategy 2030 • National Development plan 2014 - 2020 • Regional Policy Guidelines 2013- 2020 • Oriented on unlocking the potentialof different areas • Urban development issues – part of national regional policy • Proposes polycentric development as a precondition for sustainable and balanced development

  10. National spatial development perspective Settlement structure Development directions: • enhancement of the potential and competitiveness of the development centres • mutual co-operation and interaction of urban and rural areas • establishing of functional networks of development centres

  11. Spaces of national interest Development directions: • Rural development space • Baltic Sea coastal area • Riga metropolis area • Eastern border (EU external border) • Outstanding areas of nature, landscape and cultural history

  12. Role and potential ofurban areas (I) • International development centre (1) • CapitalRiga, largest city among the Baltic states • scientific and entrepreneurial potential • significant business, science, culture and tourism centre of Northern Europe with a global development perspective • National development centres (8) • largest cities with developed industry, transport, public services and social infrastructure • centres of economic growth and knowledge creation, the driving forces of economic development • in co-operation and interaction with the nearest urban and rural areas can create the critical mass for growth

  13. Role and potential ofurban areas (II) • Regional development centres (21) • significant production and/ or culture centres with developed social infrastructure and various services • the potential considerably exceeding the potential of the rest of small towns • should continuespecialization, developing mutually supplementing co-operation, thus achieving the attraction of human resources and economic activity equal to development centres of national significance

  14. Role and potential of urban areas (III) • Local centres – small towns, in some cases larger rural centres, identified by planning regions • provide basic public services and working places, also for surrounding areas • ensure attractive living environment

  15. Policy approach in strengthening urban areas • Investment concentration in development centres within the regional development support measures • Integrated local development strategies - basis for allocation of investments • Place based and integrated solutions • «Basket» of services for each level of development centres - one of the criteria for allocation of investments (entrepreneurship, education, health, culture, social care, sport) • Thematic focus of investments: business infrastructure, quality and availability of public services, mobility, administrative capacity

  16. Thank you!

More Related