290 likes | 435 Views
Overview. Background on Northwest Forest PlanReporting strategyLessons learnedRecommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994. 95. 97. 98. 99. 2000. 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 2006. 96. Timeline. . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepare monitoring plans. Hire staff. Prepare annual reports. Prepare 10-year i
E N D
1. ReportingLessons Learned from the Northwest Forest Plan’s Experiences Craig Palmer
Mojave Network Data Manager
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
2. Overview Background on Northwest Forest Plan
Reporting strategy
Lessons learned
Recommendations
3. Timeline
4. Northwest Forest Plan 1993 at direction of President Clinton
Resolve conflict over timber management and protection of natural resources (e.g. spotted owl)
10 million hectares (24 million acres)
Federal Government land management units (USFS, BLM, NPS)
100 year plan
5. Monitoring is a requirement
6. Covering the range of the northern spotted owl, the NWFP includes 62 million acres – of which 24 million are federal lands
The organization includes 8 cooperating agencies and the Regional Monitoring Team is staffed with employees from Forest Service, Bureau of Land management, and Fish and Wildlife Service
Not shown here is the list of interagency science teams with members from USGS, EPA, NPS, PNW, PSW, State Agencies and othersCovering the range of the northern spotted owl, the NWFP includes 62 million acres – of which 24 million are federal lands
The organization includes 8 cooperating agencies and the Regional Monitoring Team is staffed with employees from Forest Service, Bureau of Land management, and Fish and Wildlife Service
Not shown here is the list of interagency science teams with members from USGS, EPA, NPS, PNW, PSW, State Agencies and others
7. Review of other monitoring programs Broad spatial scale
Ecological focus
Multiple resource issues
Long-term
Contributing to ongoing management decision-making
8. Primary reasons for failure of monitoring programs No link to decision-making
Poor basis for selection of measurements (indicators)
Little ecological or scientific foundation
Lack of emphasis on data quality and accessibility
9. Approaches Recommended for Monitoring Linkage to decision-making
Adaptive management
Prospective monitoring
Reporting
Indicator selection
Seven step process
Ecological foundation
Conceptual model for habitat monitoring
Data quality and accessibility
Structured quality assurance program
Identification of essential data from external programs
10. Approach to Reporting Adaptive management cycle
Conceptual model for reporting
Role of annual and interpretive reports
11. Adaptive Management Cycle
13. Lessons Learned Value of annual reports
Effort required for interpretive reports
Data management issues
14. Benefits of Annual Reports Motivate staff to process data
Tangible products for accountability
Building blocks for interpretive reports
Builds client base
15. 10- Year Interpretive Report
17. Synthesis report topics What was expected?
What actually occurred?
How different are they?
Were these differences caused by the Plan?
How certain are you?
Are the assumptions (premises) of the Plan still valid?
18. Data Management Issues
19. Data Types
20. We compared the corporate system road layer to Digital Ortho Quad Maps (shown on left) for 38 watersheds.
We compared the corporate system road layer to Digital Ortho Quad Maps (shown on left) for 38 watersheds.
21. Ranking of issues
22. Ranking of Issues Level Impact Value
Very High Could not complete section in report 4
High Section completed with limitations 3
Moderate Delayed completion of section of report 2
Low Section completed on time - but with significant effort 1
None No impact to this module's report 0
23. Top ranking issues
24. Streams Issue- inconsistent identification of streams (intermittent)
Impact- most module reports impacted
Vision- interagency regional hydrography data layers collected in a consistent manner
25. Land Use Allocation Map Updated land use allocation map
Issue- does not include riparian reserves
Impact- most module reports impacted
e.g. dispersal habitat for owls, evaluation of watershed health
Vision- LUA coverage that includes riparian reserves
26. Activities Restoration, harvests, thinning etc.
Issue – spatial data not collected for activities
Impact – most module reports impacted, required work-arounds
Vision – regional activities database with spatial information
27. Vegetation Mapping Used remotely sensed maps, plot data sets, data analysis tools, created habitat maps (northern spotted owls, marbled murrelets)
Issue- difference between CA (polygons) and WA/OR (pixels)
Impact-most module
reports
Vision- single approach
to vegetation mapping
30. Recommendations to the I&M Program related to Reporting Consider the role of reporting in the adaptive management cycle
Encourage annual reports
Provides many benefits
Consider the importance of periodic interpretive reports
Will require outside help and involvement
Begin now to identify your external data needs
Begin now to address data management obstacles