260 likes | 436 Views
Other Tectonic Rifts: the Woodlark-D'Entrecasteaux Rift, Papua New Guinea. Geoffrey Abers, Boston University. Thanks to: A. Ferris (BU), S. Baldwin (Syracuse), B. Taylor (Hawaii), H. Davies (UPNG), many others. Some Recent US Projects. Marine geophysical surveys (1990s)
E N D
Other Tectonic Rifts: the Woodlark-D'Entrecasteaux Rift, Papua New Guinea Geoffrey Abers, Boston University Thanks to:A. Ferris (BU), S. Baldwin (Syracuse), B. Taylor (Hawaii), H. Davies (UPNG), many others.
Some Recent US Projects • Marine geophysical surveys (1990s) • Leg 180 Drilling: active fault system (1998) • WoodSeis2000 Passive seismic experiment • Core complex P-T-t-D thermochronology • Raised/drowned coral survey (2002-4)
Woodlark Basin Sea floor 72 mm/yr 32 mm/yr 57 mm/yr [Taylor et al., 1999 JGR] volcano • Rift follows weak, thickened continental crust • Magnetic lineations constrain past 4-6 Ma motion
Sea-floor history shows stretching • 200 ± 40 km stretching before breakup (130-300% strain) • 100-200 km extension in MCC region [Taylor et al., 1999 JGR]
D’Entrecasteaux MCCs GPS rate [Baldwin et al., 2004 Nature] GPS-based velocities: Wallace et al. 2004 JGR
Exhumation Constraints 2.2Ma 4Ma • 2-2.4 Ma, 4-5 Kb granitoids • 4-5 Ma, 7-11 Kb gneisses • [Hill & Baldwin, 1993] • 4.3 Ma, > 70 km eclogites • [Baldwin et al., 2004] 5-20 km/Ma exhumation
How can rocks be exhumed so far in extension? • requires coupling from upper crust to mantle
Large events incontinentalcrust Abers et al., 1997
Exhumation in upper crust: 25° dip on shear zones. Seismic? MW 6.8 (1985)
Ewing 9203 MCS profile Moresby Seamount S N 5 km
Earthquake Fault? 1 plane parallel to fault 4-8 km depth 3 km water depth ODP Leg 180 (1998): fault gauge
Seismicity rates from global catalogs Detection complete only for M>5.3 [Abers, 2001, Geol Soc Spec Pub]
WoodSeis2000 BBU Egum
Receiver functions:Strong Moho arrival, varying depth P Ps [Abers et al. 2002 Nature; Ferris, 2002 MA thesis]
Crustal Thickness Variations [Abers et al. 2002 Nature; Ferris, 2002 MA thesis]
Flow beneath core complexes Lower crustal flow Mantle flow moho
Moho cross section: Thins under MCC’s Where is missing buoyancy? [Abers et al. 2002 Nature]
Velocity Anomaly is 30-100 km deep beneath thin crust... ... and isostatically compensates crust [Abers et al. 2002 Nature]
Vp-T relations at 2 GPa How Hot? >4% @ 2-3 GPa 4% Vp relative to iasp91 elastic: Hacker et al. 2003 + anelasticity; no melt
Crustal Velocities Joint inversion for Vp, Vs, hypocenters Vp 11.5 km 23.5 km [Ferris et al. 2006 in press GJI] resolution limit
“normal” continent low Vp below Moho Velocities in the Crust [Ferris et al. 2006 in press GJI]
Contin. Oceanic Possible Compositions Seismic Moho [Ferris et al. 2006 in press GJI]
What is seismic Moho good for? • Marker of density boundary? probably • Structural marker indicating strain? • not clear what is below • UHP exhumation requires crust, mantle exchange
Summary Up to 200 km extension in 4 Ma (how?) Exhumation of 70 (100) km in 4.3 (8) Ma Crustal unroofing on faults dipping 25°- 33° Thinned crust underneath, mantle flow Compensated by hot mantle Magmatism mostly at base of crust before rifting
syn-rift volcanics: progression from andesitic to bimodal at high extension from I. Smith, multiple papers